Eye Tracking in the Wild: Piloting a Real-Life Assessment Paradigm for Older Adults.
eye movements
eye tracking
feasibility study
grocery shopping
individual differences
older age
personality
real life
usability
Journal
Journal of eye movement research
ISSN: 1995-8692
Titre abrégé: J Eye Mov Res
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101532119
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 May 2019
24 May 2019
Historique:
entrez:
8
4
2021
pubmed:
24
5
2019
medline:
24
5
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Previous research showed associations between personality traits and eye movements of young adults in the laboratory. However, less is known about these associations in real life and in older age. Primarily, there seems to be no paradigm to assess eye movements of older adults in real life. The present feasibility study thus aimed to test grocery shopping as a real-life assessment paradigm with older adults. Additionally, possible links between personality traits and eye movements were explored. The sample consisted of 38 older individuals (M = 72.85 years). Participants did their grocery shopping in a supermarket while wearing an eye tracker. Three key feasibility issues were examined, that is (1) wearability of the eye tracker during grocery shopping, (2) recording, and (3) evaluation of eye movements in a real-life context. Our real-life assessment paradigm showed to be feasible to implement and acceptable to older adults. This feasibility study provides specific practical recommendations which may be useful for future studies that plan to innovatively expand the traditional methods repertoire of personality science and aging research by using eye tracking in real life.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33828718
doi: 10.16910/jemr.12.1.4
pmc: PMC7898008
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the contents of the article are in agreement with the ethics described in http://biblio.unibe.ch/portale/elibrary/BOP/jemr/ethics.html and that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Références
J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98
pubmed: 1202204
Psychol Sci. 2009 Apr;20(4):495-501
pubmed: 19399981
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Nov 29;6:321
pubmed: 23226124
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Apr 13;12:105
pubmed: 29713270
Cognition. 2012 Jan;122(1):86-90
pubmed: 21983424
J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2018 Jun 11;5:2055668318773991
pubmed: 31191938
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003 Aug;13(4):428-32
pubmed: 12965289
Psychosom Med. 2012 May;74(4):410-7
pubmed: 22582338
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Aug;62(8):1457-506
pubmed: 19449261
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013 Apr 23;10:42
pubmed: 23618596
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2010 Jun;64(3):299-308
pubmed: 20408990
Psychol Bull. 1998 Nov;124(3):372-422
pubmed: 9849112
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2002 Nov;34(4):455-70
pubmed: 12564550
J Res Pers. 2009 Dec 1;43(6):987-998
pubmed: 20160913
Psychol Aging. 2012 Mar;27(1):243-249
pubmed: 21604884