Influence of Artificially Generated Interocular Blur Difference on Fusion Stability Under Vergence Stress.

binocular fusion efficiency binocular rivalry blur balance blur conflict natural image statistics signal strength suppression vergence demand

Journal

Journal of eye movement research
ISSN: 1995-8692
Titre abrégé: J Eye Mov Res
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101532119

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Sep 2019
Historique:
entrez: 8 4 2021
pubmed: 11 9 2019
medline: 11 9 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The stability of fusion was evaluated by its breakage when interocular blur differences were presented under vergence demand to healthy subjects. We presumed that these blur differences cause suppression of the more blurred image (interocular blur suppression, IOBS), disrupt binocular fusion and suppressed eye leaves its forced vergent position. During dichoptic presentation of static grayscale images of natural scenes, the luminance contrast (mode B) or higher-spatial frequency content (mode C) or luminance contrast plus higher-spatial frequency content (mode A) were stepwise reduced in the image presented to the non-dominant eye. We studied the effect of these types of blur on fusion stability at various levels of the vergence demand. During the divergence demand, the fusion was disrupted with approximately half blur than during convergence. Various modes of blur influenced fusion differently. The mode C (isolated reduction of higher-spatial frequency content) violated fusion under the lowest vergence demand significantly more than either isolated or combined reduction of luminance contrast (mode B and A). According to our results, the image´s details (i.e. higher-spatial frequency content) protects binocular fusion from disruption by the lowest vergence demand.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33828740
doi: 10.16910/jemr.12.4.4
pmc: PMC7880136
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

J Opt Soc Am. 1979 Jun;69(6):838-47
pubmed: 490227
Br J Ophthalmol. 1996 Apr;80(4):373-7
pubmed: 8703893
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Oct 1;57(13):5107-5115
pubmed: 27699409
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Aug 29;52(9):6849-59
pubmed: 21775663
Vision Res. 1976;16(3):269-75
pubmed: 1266071
BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun 28;17(1):105
pubmed: 28659140
PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e20367
pubmed: 21629791
Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Oct 19;5:116
pubmed: 22028689
Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2001 Oct;36(2-3):96-107
pubmed: 11690606
J Vis. 2015 Mar 26;15(3):
pubmed: 25814548
Front Integr Neurosci. 2014 May 07;8:37
pubmed: 24847226
Nat Neurosci. 2002 Sep;5(9):839-40
pubmed: 12195427
Ophthalmology. 2013 Aug;120(8):1672-80
pubmed: 23622875
J AAPOS. 2007 Aug;11(4):362-6
pubmed: 17419082
Vision Res. 1989;29(7):837-47
pubmed: 2623826
J Cogn Neurosci. 1996 Summer;8(3):197-230
pubmed: 23968149
J Vis. 2012 Oct 31;12(11):
pubmed: 23115217
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2008 Jul 15;3(1-2):125-52
pubmed: 20517504
J Vis. 2007 Nov 21;7(14):3.1-11
pubmed: 18217798
J AAPOS. 2008 Aug;12(4):370-4
pubmed: 18378476
PLoS One. 2013 May 31;8(5):e65103
pubmed: 23741468
J Vis. 2010 May 01;10(5):13
pubmed: 20616139
Malays J Med Sci. 2000 Jul;7(2):18-26
pubmed: 22977386
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Oct;18(5):840-7
pubmed: 21779945
Vision Res. 2007 Nov;47(24):3096-107
pubmed: 17904610
J Vis. 2014 Sep 19;14(11):
pubmed: 25240063
J Physiol. 1970 Dec;211(3):599-622
pubmed: 5501054
Ophthalmology. 2006 Jun;113(6):895-903
pubmed: 16751032
Psychol Rev. 1976 Jan;83(1):1-36
pubmed: 766038
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Mar 31;106(13):5436-41
pubmed: 19289828
J Opt Soc Am. 1983 Dec;73(12):1665-73
pubmed: 6663369
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004 Aug;5(8):617-29
pubmed: 15263892
Neuroscience. 2007 Apr 25;146(1):435-48
pubmed: 17346895
Eye (Lond). 1996;10 ( Pt 2):270-3
pubmed: 8776459
Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1994 Jun;72(3):376-80
pubmed: 7976272
Vision Res. 2009 Feb;49(4):451-9
pubmed: 19124036
J Vis. 2013 May 31;13(6):19
pubmed: 23729770
Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Mar 1;6(3):120-125
pubmed: 11861189
Front Psychol. 2014 May 19;5:453
pubmed: 24904469

Auteurs

Miroslav Dostalek (M)

Center of Paediatric Ophthalmology BINOCULAR, Litomysl; Czech Republic.
Masaryk University, Faculty of Medicine, Dept. Optometry and Orthoptics, Brno, Czech Republic.

Karel Fliegel (K)

Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Dept. Radioelectronics, Czech Republic.

Ladislav Dusek (L)

Masaryk University, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Brno, Czech Republic.

Tomas Lukes (T)

Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Dept. Radioelectronics, Czech Republic.
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne; Switzerland.

Jan Hejda (J)

Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Dept. Biomedical Technology, Czech Republic.

Michaela Duchackova (M)

Center of Paediatric Ophthalmology BINOCULAR, Litomysl; Czech Republic.
Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Dept. Biomedical Technology, Czech Republic.

Jiri Hozman (J)

Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Dept. Biomedical Technology, Czech Republic.

Rudolf Autrata (R)

Masaryk University, Faculty of Medicine, Dept. Pediatric Ophthalmology, Brno, Czech Republic.

Classifications MeSH