Two hours in Hollywood: A manually annotated ground truth data set of eye movements during movie clip watching.
Eye tracking
eye movement
eye movement classification
gaze
hand-labelling
movie viewing
smooth pursuit
Journal
Journal of eye movement research
ISSN: 1995-8692
Titre abrégé: J Eye Mov Res
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101532119
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Jul 2020
27 Jul 2020
Historique:
entrez:
8
4
2021
pubmed:
9
4
2021
medline:
9
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In this short article we present our manual annotation of the eye movement events in a subset of the large-scale eye tracking data set Hollywood2. Our labels include fixations, saccades, and smooth pursuits, as well as a noise event type (the latter representing either blinks, loss of tracking, or physically implausible signals). In order to achieve more consistent annotations, the gaze samples were labelled by a novice rater based on rudimentary algorithmic suggestions, and subsequently corrected by an expert rater. Overall, we annotated eye movement events in the recordings corresponding to 50 randomly selected test set clips and 6 training set clips from Hollywood2, which were viewed by 16 observers and amount to a total of approximately 130 minutes of gaze data. In these labels, 62.4% of the samples were attributed to fixations, 9.1% - to saccades, and, notably, 24.2% - to pursuit (the remainder marked as noise). After evaluation of 15 published eye movement classification algorithms on our newly collected annotated data set, we found that the most recent algorithms perform very well on average, and even reach human-level labelling quality for fixations and saccades, but all have a much larger room for improvement when it comes to smooth pursuit classification. The data set is made available at https://gin.g-node.org/ioannis.agtzidis/hollywood2_em.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33828806
doi: 10.16910/jemr.13.4.5
pmc: PMC8005322
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the contents of the article are in agreement with the ethics described in http://biblio.unibe.ch/portale/eli-brary/BOP/jemr/ethics.html and that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Références
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013 Sep;60(9):2484-93
pubmed: 23625350
Brain Cogn. 2008 Dec;68(3):219-28
pubmed: 18835076
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Apr;49(2):616-637
pubmed: 27193160
Neuroimage Clin. 2013 Sep 03;3:340-51
pubmed: 24273718
J Vis. 2009 May 19;9(5):19.1-15
pubmed: 19757897
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Feb;50(1):160-181
pubmed: 28233250
J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Jun;27(6):1137-45
pubmed: 25436668
Vision Res. 2015 Jul;112:55-67
pubmed: 25982715
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Apr;51(2):556-572
pubmed: 30411227
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Oct;50(5):1864-1881
pubmed: 29052166
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010 Nov;57(11):
pubmed: 20667803
J Vis. 2010 Dec 20;10(14):21
pubmed: 21172900
Cereb Cortex. 1998 Jan-Feb;8(1):40-7
pubmed: 9510384
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2017 May;39(5):893-907
pubmed: 27187946
Behav Res Methods. 2013 Mar;45(1):203-15
pubmed: 22806708
Vision Res. 2019 Mar;156:1-9
pubmed: 30641092
Vision Res. 1985;25(4):561-3
pubmed: 4060608
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Aug 29;5(8):180502
pubmed: 30225041
Sci Data. 2016 Oct 25;3:160092
pubmed: 27779621
Front Hum Neurosci. 2008 Mar 28;1:1
pubmed: 18958215
J Vis. 2019 Dec 2;19(14):10
pubmed: 31830239
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2016 Jan;39(1):82-9
pubmed: 26707755
J Neurol. 2013 Jan;260(1):275-84
pubmed: 22926163
Med Biol Eng Comput. 1991 Jan;29(1):63-9
pubmed: 2016922
J Vis. 2010 Aug 26;10(10):28
pubmed: 20884493
J Neurophysiol. 1999 Jul;82(1):463-71
pubmed: 10400972