A Systematic Scoping Review of the Impacts of Community Food Production Initiatives in Kenya, Cameroon, and South Africa.
Cameroon
Community Food Production Initiatives
Food and nutrition security
Kenya
South Africa
environment and public health
food production
food security
triple burden of malnutrition
Journal
Journal of global health reports
ISSN: 2399-1623
Titre abrégé: J Glob Health Rep
Pays: Scotland
ID NLM: 101731683
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
entrez:
8
4
2021
pubmed:
9
4
2021
medline:
9
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Even before the COVID-19 pandemic, one in two people in Africa were food insecure. The burden of malnutrition remains high (e.g. childhood stunting, anaemia in women of reproductive age) or are increasing (e.g. overweight and obesity). A range of coordinated actions are required to improve this situation, including increasing local food production and consumption. The aim of this review was to provide a systematic and comprehensive overview of recently published research into the health, social, economic, and environmental impacts of community food production initiatives (CFPIs) in Kenya, Cameroon and South Africa. We searched eight electronic databases covering health, social, environmental, economic and agricultural sciences. Primary research studies published from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2018 were considered. Data on geographic location, study design, type of CFPI and the impacts assessed were abstracted from eligible articles. We identified 4828 articles, 260 of which required full-text review and 118 met our eligibility criteria. Most research was conducted in Kenya (53.4%) and South Africa (38.1%). The categories of CFPIs studied were (in order of decreasing frequency): crop farming, livestock farming, unspecified farming, fisheries, home / school gardens, urban agriculture, and agroforestry. The largest number of studies were on the economic and environmental impacts of CFPIs, followed by their health and social impacts. The health impacts investigated included food security, nutrition status and dietary intake. One study investigated the potential impact of CFPIs on non-communicable diseases. Over 60% of studies investigated a single category of impact. Not one of the studies explicitly used a theoretical framework to guide its design or interpretation. Our findings on research studies of CFPIs suggest the need for a greater focus on interdisciplinary research in order to improve understanding of the relationships between their health, environmental, economic, and social impacts. Greater use of explicit theoretical frameworks could assist in research design and interpretation, helping to ensure its relevance to informing coordinated intersectoral interventions and policy initiatives.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Even before the COVID-19 pandemic, one in two people in Africa were food insecure. The burden of malnutrition remains high (e.g. childhood stunting, anaemia in women of reproductive age) or are increasing (e.g. overweight and obesity). A range of coordinated actions are required to improve this situation, including increasing local food production and consumption. The aim of this review was to provide a systematic and comprehensive overview of recently published research into the health, social, economic, and environmental impacts of community food production initiatives (CFPIs) in Kenya, Cameroon and South Africa.
METHODS
METHODS
We searched eight electronic databases covering health, social, environmental, economic and agricultural sciences. Primary research studies published from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2018 were considered. Data on geographic location, study design, type of CFPI and the impacts assessed were abstracted from eligible articles.
FINDINGS
RESULTS
We identified 4828 articles, 260 of which required full-text review and 118 met our eligibility criteria. Most research was conducted in Kenya (53.4%) and South Africa (38.1%). The categories of CFPIs studied were (in order of decreasing frequency): crop farming, livestock farming, unspecified farming, fisheries, home / school gardens, urban agriculture, and agroforestry. The largest number of studies were on the economic and environmental impacts of CFPIs, followed by their health and social impacts. The health impacts investigated included food security, nutrition status and dietary intake. One study investigated the potential impact of CFPIs on non-communicable diseases. Over 60% of studies investigated a single category of impact. Not one of the studies explicitly used a theoretical framework to guide its design or interpretation.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings on research studies of CFPIs suggest the need for a greater focus on interdisciplinary research in order to improve understanding of the relationships between their health, environmental, economic, and social impacts. Greater use of explicit theoretical frameworks could assist in research design and interpretation, helping to ensure its relevance to informing coordinated intersectoral interventions and policy initiatives.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33829114
doi: 10.29392/001c.19468
pmc: PMC7610539
mid: EMS120817
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_00006/6
Pays : United Kingdom
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Références
Matern Child Nutr. 2015 Dec;11 Suppl 3:39-54
pubmed: 26778801
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Mar;105:16-21
pubmed: 24606793
Eval Program Plann. 2018 Dec;71:51-57
pubmed: 30114616
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2018 Dec;50(8):1951-1955
pubmed: 29850979
Vet World. 2015 Jan;8(1):88-96
pubmed: 27047003
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473
pubmed: 30178033
Food Nutr Bull. 2015 Mar;36(1):33-42
pubmed: 25898714
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014 Apr;1311:88-101
pubmed: 24725148
Nat Food. 2020 Sep;1(9):541-551
pubmed: 37128008
Food Secur. 2017;9:1053-1071
pubmed: 32952744
PLoS One. 2018 May 31;13(5):e0197995
pubmed: 29852008
Lancet. 2019 May 11;393(10184):1958-1972
pubmed: 30954305
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2018 Dec 17;42:e176
pubmed: 31093204
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Jun 30;17(1):457
pubmed: 28666412
Food Nutr Bull. 2018 Mar;39(1):86-106
pubmed: 28826252
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Oct 05;14(10):
pubmed: 28981478
Global Health. 2020 Oct 19;16(1):100
pubmed: 33076935
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Mar;21(4):777-784
pubmed: 29173215
Food Secur. 2014 Dec;6(6):851-860
pubmed: 33897914
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2014 Sep;155(1):66-76
pubmed: 24942144
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 25;9(11):e113614
pubmed: 25422888
Food Nutr Bull. 2018 Mar;39(1):3-27
pubmed: 29226708
Health Promot Int. 2017 Oct 1;32(5):800-807
pubmed: 27053643
Lancet. 2019 Feb 2;393(10170):447-492
pubmed: 30660336
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Sep 27;365(1554):2793-807
pubmed: 20713385
Ecol Food Nutr. 2016 Sep-Oct;55(5):403-27
pubmed: 27398836
Pan Afr Med J. 2017 Nov 03;28(Suppl 1):5
pubmed: 30197734
Infect Ecol Epidemiol. 2018 Nov 27;9(1):1547095
pubmed: 30598736