Implementation and Evaluation of the Premature Infant Pain Profile-revised (PIPP-R) e-Learning Module for Assessing Pain in Infants.
Journal
The Clinical journal of pain
ISSN: 1536-5409
Titre abrégé: Clin J Pain
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8507389
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 05 2021
01 05 2021
Historique:
received:
23
07
2020
accepted:
28
12
2020
entrez:
8
4
2021
pubmed:
9
4
2021
medline:
19
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Premature Infant Pain Profile-revised (PIPP-R) is a well-established measure for infant pain assessment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation and clinical utility of the PIPP-R electronic learning (e-Learning) module to promote standardized health care training for nurses. A descriptive mixed-methods study was conducted in 2 tertiary Neonatal Intensive Care Units in Canada. Nurses were recruited and asked to complete the PIPP-R e-Learning Module and evaluate it. A 26-item questionnaire was used to describe nurse demographics and clinical experience and to evaluate implementation success (ie, acceptability, feasibility, usability) and clinical utility. In all, 98 nurses from 2 settings in Central and Eastern Canada participated; most were registered nurses highly experienced in neonatal nursing care. The majority had received previous training on the PIPP-R (61.2%) and routinely used it in practice (67.4%). They considered the e-Learning module as acceptable and feasible as it was easy to access (94.9%) and to navigate (94.8%). Content was considered clear (98.9%) and met users' learning needs (99.0%). Nurses agreed that completing the module improved their understanding of neonatal pain (96.0%) and was clinically useful in improving their ability to assess pain in neonates (97.9%). The module was accessed primarily from work settings (77.8%) using desktop computers (49.0%) or tablets (28.0%) and was usually completed in a single session (75.7%). Nurses' evaluation of the PIPP-R e-Learning module was overwhelmingly positive. The module was perceived as easy to implement, clinically useful, and was considered as a promising online educational tool. Further testing in clinical practice is needed to build on the results of this study and support the importance of dissemination of this module for standardized training purposes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33830093
doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000925
pii: 00002508-202105000-00008
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
372-378Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Raja SN, Srinivasa N, Carr DB, et al. The revised International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: concepts, challenges, and compromises. Pain. 2020;161:1976–1982.
Gibbins S, Stevens BJ, Yamada J, et al. Validation of the Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised (PIPP-R). Early Hum Dev. 2014;19:189–193.
Giordano V, Edobor J, Deindl P, et al. Pain and sedation scales for neonatal and pediatric patients in a preverbal stage of development: a systematic review. JAMA Pediatr. 2019;173:1186–1197.
Lee GY, Yamada J, Kyololo O, et al. Pediatric clinical practice guidelines for acute procedural pain: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2014;133:500–515.
Committee on Fetus and Newborn and Section on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. Prevention and management of procedural pain in the neonate: an update. Pediatrics. 2016;137:e20154271.
Stevens B, Johnston C, Petryshen P, et al. Premature Infant Pain Profile: development and initial validation. Clin J Pain. 1996;12:13–22.
Stevens B, Johnston C, Taddio A, et al. The Premature Infant Pain Profile: evaluation 13 years after development. Clin J Pain. 2010;26:813–830.
Stevens BJ, Gibbins S, Yamada J, et al. The Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised (PIPP-R). Clin J Pain. 2014;30:238–243.
Fitri SYR, Lusmilasari L, Juffrie M. The Indonesian version of the Premature Infant Pain Profile–Revised: translation and adaptation of a neonatal pain assessment. Int J Nurs Sci. 2019;6:439–444.
Olsson E, Anderzén-Carlsson A, Atladóttir SM, et al. Cultural adaptation and harmonization of four Nordic translations of the revised Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP-R). BMC Pediatr. 2018;18:349.
Bueno M, Moreno-Ramos MC, Forni E, et al. Adaptation and initial validation of the Premature Infant Pain Profile–Revised (PIPP-R) in Brazil. Pain Manag Nurs. 2019;20:512–515.
Taplak AŞ, Bayat M. Psychometric Testing of the Turkish Version of the Premature Infant Pain Profile Revised-PIPP-R. J Pediatr Nurs. 2019;48:e49–e55.
Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38:65–76.
Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzig RM. The impact of e-learning in medical education. Acad Med. 2006;81:207–212.
Sinclair PM, Kable A, Levett-Jones T, et al. The effectiveness of Internet-based e-learning on clinician behaviour and patient outcomes: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016;57:70–81.
Wutoh R, Boren SA, Balas EA. eLearning: a review of internet-based continuing medical education. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2004;24:20–30.
Bloomfield JG, Jones A. Using e-learning to support clinical skills acquisition: exploring the experiences and perceptions of graduate first-year pre-registration nursing students—a mixed method study. Nurse Educ Today. 2013;33:1605–1611.
Carroll C, Booth A, Papaioannou D, et al. UK health-care professionals’ experience of on-line learning techniques: a systematic review of qualitative data. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2009;29:235–241.
Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, et al. Internet-based learning in the health professions: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008;300:1181–1196.
Kowlowitz V, Davenport CS, Palmer MH. Development and dissemination of web-based clinical simulations for continuing geriatric nursing education. J Gerontol Nurs. 2009;35:37–43.
Childs S, Blenkinsopp E, Hall A, et al. Effective e-learning for health professionals and students-barriers and their solutions. A systematic review of the literature-findings from the HeXL project. Health Info Libr J. 2005;22 (suppl 2):20–32.
Asarbakhsh M, Sandars J. E-learning: the essential usability perspective. Clin Teach. 2013;10:47–50.
McCurdie T, Taneva S, Casselman M, et al. mHealth consumer apps: the case for user-centered design. Biomed Instrum Technol. 2012;suppl:49–56.
Stevens B, Dinsdale S, Promislow S, et al. Evaluation of the Premature Infant Pain Profile: revised eLearning module for enhancing clinical practice and research. Council of International Neonatal Nurses 9th Conference 2016. Vancouver, BC, Canada; August 14–17, 2016.
Costa T, Rossato LM, Bueno M, et al. Nurses’ knowledge and practices regarding pain management in newborns. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2017;51:e03210.
Pölkki T, Korhonen A, Laukkala H. Parents’ use of nonpharmacologic methods to manage procedural ain in infants. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2018;47:43–51.
Orovec A, Disher T, Caddell K, et al. Assessment and management of procedural pain during the entire neonatal intensive care unit hospitalization. Pain Manag Nurs. 2019;20:503–511.
Kyololo OM, Stevens B, Gastaldo D, et al. Procedural pain in neonatal units in Kenya. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2014;99:F464–F467.
Bueno M, Eriksson M, Stevens B Stevens B, Hathway G, Zempsky WT. Neonatal and infant pain assessment. Oxford Textbook of Paediatric Pain, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. In press.
Pilcher J. NICU nurse educators: what evidence supports your teaching strategies? Neonatal Netw. 2013;32:281–284.
Rouleau G, Gagnon MP, Côté J, et al. Effects of e-learning in a continuing education context on nursing care: systematic review of systematic qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-studies reviews. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21:e15118.
Bueno M, Silva FFF, Gave N, et al. The use of information and communication technologies for teaching about pain: a scoping review. Rev Paul Enferm. 2019;30:1–14.
Liossi C, Failo A, Schoth DE, et al. The effectiveness of online pain resources for health professionals: a systematic review with subset meta-analysis of educational intervention studies. Pain. 2018;159:631–643.
Gibbins S, Maddalena P, Yamada J, et al. Testing the satisfaction and feasibility of a computer-based teaching module in the neonatal intensive care unit. Adv Neonatal Care. 2007;7:43–49.
Bueno M, Duarte ED, Marques RL, et al. Neonatal pain assessment program II: an innovative strategy to increase knowledge translation. Case report. Rev Dor. 2014;15:152–155.
Silva FFF, da, Costa T, Peres HHC, et al. Expert assessment of the “Neonatal Pain Assessment Program” online course. Rev Bras Enferm. 2020;73:e20180392.
Bueno M, Costa T, Silva F, et al. Users’ evaluation of an e-learning curriculum on neonatal pain assessment in Portuguese (Brazil): Programa de Avaliação Da Dor Neonatal (PAD-Neo). 12th International Symposium on Pediatric Pain 2019. Basel, Switzerland; June 19–20, 2019.
Maramba I, Chatterjee A, Newman C. Methods of usability testing in the development of eHealth applications: a scoping review. Int J Med Inform. 2019;126:95–104.
Broekhuis M, van Velsen L, Hermens H. Assessing usability of eHealth technology: a comparison of usability benchmarking instruments. Int J Med Inform. 2019;128:24–31.
Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50.
Carpentier E, Moreau F, Soriot-Thomas S, et al. Training program for pain assessment in the newborn. Arch Pediatr. 2018;25:35–38.
Vaona A, Banzi R, Kwag KH, et al. E-learning for health professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;1:CD011736.