CT measures of adrenal gland length and caudal pole diameter are reproducible in large breed dogs: A pilot study.
CT
canine
endocrinology
imaging
Journal
Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association
ISSN: 1740-8261
Titre abrégé: Vet Radiol Ultrasound
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9209635
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2021
Jul 2021
Historique:
revised:
28
01
2021
received:
10
04
2020
accepted:
28
01
2021
pubmed:
9
4
2021
medline:
16
7
2021
entrez:
8
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Computed tomography (CT) is increasingly available to evaluate dogs with suspected adrenal disease, however, published studies describing the reproducibility of CT methods for quantifying adrenal gland (AG) measurements are lacking. This prospective, pilot, observer agreement study aimed to evaluate reproducibility and repeatability of two different methods of measurement of AGs on CT to establish a usable technique and define standard reference ranges. Multiplanar reformatted (MPR) CT images of both AGs of six large breed dogs were obtained with the MPR axis parallel to the spine and parallel to the long axis of the AG. Ten measurements were performed: maximal length and diameter at cranial and caudal poles on dorsal, sagittal, and transverse images; and minimal diameter of cranial and caudal poles on transverse images. Three observers with different levels of experience repeated these measurements three times for each dog. Intra- and interobserver variability were calculated through intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The differences in time to perform measurements between the two methods were tested with Student's t-test. Regardless of the measurement method used, length of AGs on dorsal and sagittal MPR images had the lowest intra- and inter-observer variability (ICC = 0.93-0.99), diameter of caudal pole on transverse plane showed low intra- and interobserver variability (ICC = 0.77-0.80) and diameter of cranial pole had the highest variability (ICC = 0.12-0.61). Although length was the less variable measurement, its use may be unrealistic in daily practice. Interestingly measurement of caudal pole on transverse plane was characterized by low intra- and interobserver variability. No difference in time performing the measurements was noted between the two methods.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33831244
doi: 10.1111/vru.12970
pmc: PMC8360083
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
402-412Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Veterinary Radiology.
Références
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2016 Nov 15;249(10):1165-1169
pubmed: 27823369
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2015 May-Jun;56(3):317-26
pubmed: 25496665
Vet Surg. 2016 May;45(4):427-35
pubmed: 27007886
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2006 Sep-Oct;47(5):444-8
pubmed: 17009504
Domest Anim Endocrinol. 2020 Jul;72:106406
pubmed: 32014740
Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 1995 Aug;16(4):317-30
pubmed: 7576778
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2008 Sep-Oct;49(5):449-53
pubmed: 18833952
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2015 Mar-Apr;56(2):153-9
pubmed: 25139015
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1995 Nov 1;207(9):1180-3
pubmed: 7559065
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2009 Nov-Dec;50(6):625-9
pubmed: 19999346
Anat Histol Embryol. 2013 Feb;42(1):57-64
pubmed: 22671298
J Vet Intern Med. 2011 Sep-Oct;25(5):1066-74
pubmed: 21848965
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2014 May 15;244(10):1181-5
pubmed: 24786166
J Feline Med Surg. 2013 Jun;15(6):445-57
pubmed: 23234721
Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 1998 Jul;28(4):869-85
pubmed: 9698619
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2021 Jul;62(4):402-412
pubmed: 33831244
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2010 Nov-Dec;51(6):656-60
pubmed: 21158241
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2003 Sep 1;223(5):654-62
pubmed: 12959384
J Vet Med Sci. 2011 Aug;73(8):985-9
pubmed: 21467755