Resting-State Functional MRI for Determining Language Lateralization in Children with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy.
Journal
AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology
ISSN: 1936-959X
Titre abrégé: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8003708
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2021
07 2021
Historique:
received:
25
09
2020
accepted:
16
02
2021
pubmed:
10
4
2021
medline:
13
10
2021
entrez:
9
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Task-based fMRI is a noninvasive method of determining language dominance; however, not all children can complete language tasks due to age, cognitive/intellectual, or language barriers. Task-free approaches such as resting-state fMRI offer an alternative method. This study evaluated resting-state fMRI for predicting language laterality in children with drug-resistant epilepsy. A retrospective review of 43 children with drug-resistant epilepsy who had undergone resting-state fMRI and task-based fMRI during presurgical evaluation was conducted. Independent component analysis of resting-state fMRI was used to identify language networks by comparing the independent components with a language network template. Concordance rates in language laterality between resting-state fMRI and each of the 4 task-based fMRI language paradigms (auditory description decision, auditory category, verbal fluency, and silent word generation tasks) were calculated. Concordance ranged from 0.64 (95% CI, 0.48-0.65) to 0.73 (95% CI, 0.58-0.87), depending on the language paradigm, with the highest concordance found for the auditory description decision task. Most (78%-83%) patients identified as left-lateralized on task-based fMRI were correctly classified as left-lateralized on resting-state fMRI. No patients classified as right-lateralized or bilateral on task-based fMRI were correctly classified by resting-state fMRI. While resting-state fMRI correctly classified most patients who had typical (left) language dominance, its ability to correctly classify patients with atypical (right or bilateral) language dominance was poor. Further study is required before resting-state fMRI can be used clinically for language mapping in the context of epilepsy surgery evaluation in children with drug-resistant epilepsy.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Task-based fMRI is a noninvasive method of determining language dominance; however, not all children can complete language tasks due to age, cognitive/intellectual, or language barriers. Task-free approaches such as resting-state fMRI offer an alternative method. This study evaluated resting-state fMRI for predicting language laterality in children with drug-resistant epilepsy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A retrospective review of 43 children with drug-resistant epilepsy who had undergone resting-state fMRI and task-based fMRI during presurgical evaluation was conducted. Independent component analysis of resting-state fMRI was used to identify language networks by comparing the independent components with a language network template. Concordance rates in language laterality between resting-state fMRI and each of the 4 task-based fMRI language paradigms (auditory description decision, auditory category, verbal fluency, and silent word generation tasks) were calculated.
RESULTS
Concordance ranged from 0.64 (95% CI, 0.48-0.65) to 0.73 (95% CI, 0.58-0.87), depending on the language paradigm, with the highest concordance found for the auditory description decision task. Most (78%-83%) patients identified as left-lateralized on task-based fMRI were correctly classified as left-lateralized on resting-state fMRI. No patients classified as right-lateralized or bilateral on task-based fMRI were correctly classified by resting-state fMRI.
CONCLUSIONS
While resting-state fMRI correctly classified most patients who had typical (left) language dominance, its ability to correctly classify patients with atypical (right or bilateral) language dominance was poor. Further study is required before resting-state fMRI can be used clinically for language mapping in the context of epilepsy surgery evaluation in children with drug-resistant epilepsy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33832955
pii: ajnr.A7110
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7110
pmc: PMC8324270
doi:
Substances chimiques
Pharmaceutical Preparations
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1299-1304Informations de copyright
© 2021 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.
Références
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018 Oct 19;23(2):171-177
pubmed: 30485177
Ann Neurol. 2014 Jan;75(1):33-42
pubmed: 24038442
Lancet Neurol. 2014 Nov;13(11):1114-1126
pubmed: 25316018
Radiology. 2016 Oct;281(1):264-9
pubmed: 27467465
Neuroradiology. 2019 Jul;61(7):803-810
pubmed: 31020344
Med Image Anal. 2001 Jun;5(2):143-56
pubmed: 11516708
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 May;192(5):1190-6
pubmed: 19380541
Cereb Cortex. 2012 Jan;22(1):158-65
pubmed: 21616982
Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Aug 1;41(11):3133-3146
pubmed: 32329951
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Feb;40(2):319-325
pubmed: 30630835
J Epilepsy Res. 2019 Dec 31;9(2):93-102
pubmed: 32509544
Front Pediatr. 2017 Aug 14;5:159
pubmed: 28856131
Seizure. 2017 Nov;52:136-146
pubmed: 29055867
Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Jun;26(5):594-601
pubmed: 18158224
Ann Neurol. 2017 Apr;81(4):526-537
pubmed: 28220524
Brain. 2015 Dec;138(Pt 12):3734-46
pubmed: 26419799
Neuroimage. 2017 Jul 1;154:188-205
pubmed: 27989777
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2004 Feb;23(2):137-52
pubmed: 14964560
Neuroimage. 2002 Sep;17(1):447-60
pubmed: 12482097
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Mar;35(3):1018-30
pubmed: 23288627
Neurology. 2017 Jan 24;88(4):395-402
pubmed: 28077494
Neuroimage. 2002 Oct;17(2):825-41
pubmed: 12377157
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Aug;39(8):1390-1399
pubmed: 29348136
Lancet Neurol. 2008 Jun;7(6):525-37
pubmed: 18485316
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Jun;38(6):1187-1192
pubmed: 28428208
Epilepsia. 2010 Jun;51(6):1069-77
pubmed: 19889013
Neuroimage. 2014 Jul 15;95:232-47
pubmed: 24657355
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014 May;85(5):581-8
pubmed: 23986313
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Feb 01;10:11
pubmed: 26869899
Neuroimage. 2014 Apr 15;90:449-68
pubmed: 24389422