Divesting from a Scored Hospital Fall Risk Assessment Tool (FRAT): A Cluster Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial.


Journal

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
ISSN: 1532-5415
Titre abrégé: J Am Geriatr Soc
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7503062

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2021
Historique:
revised: 21 02 2021
received: 16 11 2020
accepted: 26 02 2021
pubmed: 10 4 2021
medline: 25 11 2021
entrez: 9 4 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

We investigated the impact of ceasing routine falls risk assessment tool (FRAT) completion and instead used clinical reasoning to select fall mitigation strategies. Two-group, multi-site cluster-randomized active-control non-inferiority trial. Hospital wards. Adult inpatients admitted to participating hospitals (n = 10 hospitals, 123,176 bed days). Hospitals were randomly assigned (1:1) to a usual care control group that continued to use a historical FRAT to assign falls risk scores and accompanying mitigation strategies, or an experimental group whereby clinicians did not assign risk scores and instead used clinical reasoning to select fall mitigation strategies using a decision support list. The primary measure was between-group difference in mean fall rates (falls/1000 bed days). Falls were identified from incident reports supplemented by hand searches of medical records over three consecutive months at each hospital. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) of monthly falls rates in control versus experimental hospitals was also estimated. The experimental clinical reasoning approach was non-inferior to the usual care FRAT that assigned fall risk ratings when compared to a-priori stakeholder derived and sensitivity non-inferiority margins. The mean fall rates were 3.84 falls/1000 bed days for the FRAT continuing sites and 3.11 falls/1000 bed days for experimental sites. After adjusting for historical fall rates at each hospital, the IRR (95%CI) was 0.78 (0.64, 0.95), where IRR < 1.00 indicated fewer falls among the experimental group. There were 4 and 3 serious events in the control and experimental groups, respectively. Replacing a FRAT scoring system with clinical reasoning did not lead to inferior fall outcomes in the short term and may even reduce fall incidence.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES
We investigated the impact of ceasing routine falls risk assessment tool (FRAT) completion and instead used clinical reasoning to select fall mitigation strategies.
DESIGN
Two-group, multi-site cluster-randomized active-control non-inferiority trial.
SETTING
Hospital wards.
PARTICIPANTS
Adult inpatients admitted to participating hospitals (n = 10 hospitals, 123,176 bed days).
INTERVENTION
Hospitals were randomly assigned (1:1) to a usual care control group that continued to use a historical FRAT to assign falls risk scores and accompanying mitigation strategies, or an experimental group whereby clinicians did not assign risk scores and instead used clinical reasoning to select fall mitigation strategies using a decision support list.
MEASUREMENTS
The primary measure was between-group difference in mean fall rates (falls/1000 bed days). Falls were identified from incident reports supplemented by hand searches of medical records over three consecutive months at each hospital. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) of monthly falls rates in control versus experimental hospitals was also estimated.
RESULTS
The experimental clinical reasoning approach was non-inferior to the usual care FRAT that assigned fall risk ratings when compared to a-priori stakeholder derived and sensitivity non-inferiority margins. The mean fall rates were 3.84 falls/1000 bed days for the FRAT continuing sites and 3.11 falls/1000 bed days for experimental sites. After adjusting for historical fall rates at each hospital, the IRR (95%CI) was 0.78 (0.64, 0.95), where IRR < 1.00 indicated fewer falls among the experimental group. There were 4 and 3 serious events in the control and experimental groups, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Replacing a FRAT scoring system with clinical reasoning did not lead to inferior fall outcomes in the short term and may even reduce fall incidence.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33834490
doi: 10.1111/jgs.17125
pmc: PMC8518986
doi:

Types de publication

Equivalence Trial Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2598-2604

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Authors. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The American Geriatrics Society.

Références

BMJ. 2016 Jan 26;352:h6781
pubmed: 26813674
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007 Jun;62(6):664-72
pubmed: 17595425
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 07;9:CD005465
pubmed: 30191554
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Sep;69(9):2598-2604
pubmed: 33834490
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Jul;58(7):1347-52
pubmed: 20487077
Lancet. 2015 Jun 27;385(9987):2592-9
pubmed: 25865864
Age Ageing. 2009 Jul;38(4):417-23
pubmed: 19435759
BMJ. 1997 Oct 25;315(7115):1049-53
pubmed: 9366729
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 17;9(9):e030952
pubmed: 31530614
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Nov 20;157(10):692-9
pubmed: 23165660
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Mar;58(3):435-41
pubmed: 20398112
Age Ageing. 2004 Mar;33(2):122-30
pubmed: 14960426
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Mar;98:104695
pubmed: 33517181
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Apr 23;15:38
pubmed: 25899170
Stat Med. 2004 Jun 30;23(12):1921-86
pubmed: 15195324
Int J Older People Nurs. 2019 Jun;14(2):e12224
pubmed: 30811899
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Apr 15;20(1):140
pubmed: 32293298
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Feb;67(2):144-51
pubmed: 24275500
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Apr;56(4):701-4
pubmed: 18205761
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jan 22;20(1):54
pubmed: 31969145
Ann Fam Med. 2004 May-Jun;2(3):204-8
pubmed: 15209195
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Dec;29(23-24):4505-4513
pubmed: 32945020
Age Ageing. 2008 May;37(3):277-81
pubmed: 18456792
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41061
pubmed: 22815914
J Public Health (Oxf). 2004 Jun;26(2):138-43
pubmed: 15284315
Stat Med. 2015 Jan 30;34(2):281-96
pubmed: 25345738

Auteurs

Meg E Morris (ME)

Healthscope ARCH, Victorian Rehabilitation Centre, Glen Waverley, Victoria, Australia.
La Trobe Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine Research, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Melbourne, Australia.

Terry Haines (T)

School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Anne Marie Hill (AM)

School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

Ian D Cameron (ID)

John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, St. Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.

Cathy Jones (C)

Healthscope, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Dana Jazayeri (D)

Healthscope ARCH, Victorian Rehabilitation Centre, Glen Waverley, Victoria, Australia.
La Trobe Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine Research, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Melbourne, Australia.

Biswadev Mitra (B)

School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Debra Kiegaldie (D)

Holmesglen Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Eastern Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Ronald I Shorr (RI)

Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Malcom Randall VAMC, Gainesville, Florida, USA and Department of Epidemiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

Steven M McPhail (SM)

Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health & Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Clinical Informatics Directorate, Metro South Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH