Using a Secure, Continually Updating, Web Source Processing Pipeline to Support the Real-Time Data Synthesis and Analysis of Scientific Literature: Development and Validation Study.
COVID-19
critical analysis
data
data science
data synthesis
database
decision making
infodemic
infrastructure
literature
methodology
misinformation
pipeline
research
structured data synthesis
web crawl data
Journal
Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 05 2021
06 05 2021
Historique:
received:
12
11
2020
accepted:
03
04
2021
revised:
30
12
2020
pubmed:
10
4
2021
medline:
25
5
2021
entrez:
9
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The scale and quality of the global scientific response to the COVID-19 pandemic have unquestionably saved lives. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has also triggered an unprecedented "infodemic"; the velocity and volume of data production have overwhelmed many key stakeholders such as clinicians and policy makers, as they have been unable to process structured and unstructured data for evidence-based decision making. Solutions that aim to alleviate this data synthesis-related challenge are unable to capture heterogeneous web data in real time for the production of concomitant answers and are not based on the high-quality information in responses to a free-text query. The main objective of this project is to build a generic, real-time, continuously updating curation platform that can support the data synthesis and analysis of a scientific literature framework. Our secondary objective is to validate this platform and the curation methodology for COVID-19-related medical literature by expanding the COVID-19 Open Research Dataset via the addition of new, unstructured data. To create an infrastructure that addresses our objectives, the PanSurg Collaborative at Imperial College London has developed a unique data pipeline based on a web crawler extraction methodology. This data pipeline uses a novel curation methodology that adopts a human-in-the-loop approach for the characterization of quality, relevance, and key evidence across a range of scientific literature sources. REDASA (Realtime Data Synthesis and Analysis) is now one of the world's largest and most up-to-date sources of COVID-19-related evidence; it consists of 104,000 documents. By capturing curators' critical appraisal methodologies through the discrete labeling and rating of information, REDASA rapidly developed a foundational, pooled, data science data set of over 1400 articles in under 2 weeks. These articles provide COVID-19-related information and represent around 10% of all papers about COVID-19. This data set can act as ground truth for the future implementation of a live, automated systematic review. The three benefits of REDASA's design are as follows: (1) it adopts a user-friendly, human-in-the-loop methodology by embedding an efficient, user-friendly curation platform into a natural language processing search engine; (2) it provides a curated data set in the JavaScript Object Notation format for experienced academic reviewers' critical appraisal choices and decision-making methodologies; and (3) due to the wide scope and depth of its web crawling method, REDASA has already captured one of the world's largest COVID-19-related data corpora for searches and curation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The scale and quality of the global scientific response to the COVID-19 pandemic have unquestionably saved lives. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has also triggered an unprecedented "infodemic"; the velocity and volume of data production have overwhelmed many key stakeholders such as clinicians and policy makers, as they have been unable to process structured and unstructured data for evidence-based decision making. Solutions that aim to alleviate this data synthesis-related challenge are unable to capture heterogeneous web data in real time for the production of concomitant answers and are not based on the high-quality information in responses to a free-text query.
OBJECTIVE
The main objective of this project is to build a generic, real-time, continuously updating curation platform that can support the data synthesis and analysis of a scientific literature framework. Our secondary objective is to validate this platform and the curation methodology for COVID-19-related medical literature by expanding the COVID-19 Open Research Dataset via the addition of new, unstructured data.
METHODS
To create an infrastructure that addresses our objectives, the PanSurg Collaborative at Imperial College London has developed a unique data pipeline based on a web crawler extraction methodology. This data pipeline uses a novel curation methodology that adopts a human-in-the-loop approach for the characterization of quality, relevance, and key evidence across a range of scientific literature sources.
RESULTS
REDASA (Realtime Data Synthesis and Analysis) is now one of the world's largest and most up-to-date sources of COVID-19-related evidence; it consists of 104,000 documents. By capturing curators' critical appraisal methodologies through the discrete labeling and rating of information, REDASA rapidly developed a foundational, pooled, data science data set of over 1400 articles in under 2 weeks. These articles provide COVID-19-related information and represent around 10% of all papers about COVID-19.
CONCLUSIONS
This data set can act as ground truth for the future implementation of a live, automated systematic review. The three benefits of REDASA's design are as follows: (1) it adopts a user-friendly, human-in-the-loop methodology by embedding an efficient, user-friendly curation platform into a natural language processing search engine; (2) it provides a curated data set in the JavaScript Object Notation format for experienced academic reviewers' critical appraisal choices and decision-making methodologies; and (3) due to the wide scope and depth of its web crawling method, REDASA has already captured one of the world's largest COVID-19-related data corpora for searches and curation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33835932
pii: v23i5e25714
doi: 10.2196/25714
pmc: PMC8104004
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e25714Investigateurs
Ademola Adeyeye
(A)
Ahmed Ezzat
(A)
Alberto Porcu
(A)
Alexander Walmsley
(A)
Ali Farsi
(A)
Alison Faye O Chan
(A)
Aminah Abdul Razzack
(A)
Andee Dzulkarnaen Zakaria
(A)
Andrew Yiu
(A)
Antonios Soliman
(A)
Ariana Axiaq
(A)
Avinash Aujayeb
(A)
Catherine Dominic
(C)
Eduarda Sá-Marta
(E)
Eunice F Nolasco
(E)
Jessamine Edith S Ferrer
(J)
Jonathan Anthony Kat
(J)
Josephine Holt
(J)
Kamal Awad
(K)
Kirk Chalmers
(K)
Mina Ragheb
(M)
Muhammad Khawar Sana
(M)
Niraj Sandeep Kumar
(N)
Roland Amoah
(R)
Semra Demirli Atici
(S)
Shane Charles
(S)
Sunnia Ahmed
(S)
Teresa Perra
(T)
Tricia Tay
(T)
Ubaid Ullah
(U)
Zara Ahmed
(Z)
Zun Zheng Ong
(Z)
Informations de copyright
©Uddhav Vaghela, Simon Rabinowicz, Paris Bratsos, Guy Martin, Epameinondas Fritzilas, Sheraz Markar, Sanjay Purkayastha, Karl Stringer, Harshdeep Singh, Charlie Llewellyn, Debabrata Dutta, Jonathan M Clarke, Matthew Howard, PanSurg REDASA Curators, Ovidiu Serban, James Kinross. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 06.05.2021.
Références
PLoS Med. 2014 Feb 18;11(2):e1001603
pubmed: 24558353
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jan 17;22(1):e15415
pubmed: 31951213
Wellcome Open Res. 2020 Apr 2;5:60
pubmed: 32292826
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 24;22(7):e17853
pubmed: 32706701