A framework policy analysis of national health insurance policymaking in sub-Saharan Africa.


Journal

Health policy and planning
ISSN: 1460-2237
Titre abrégé: Health Policy Plan
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8610614

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Sep 2021
Historique:
accepted: 05 11 2020
pubmed: 11 4 2021
medline: 14 9 2021
entrez: 10 4 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

National health insurance (NHI) is a financing mechanism established by a national government with the goal of covering all or almost all of its citizens. A number of low- and middle-income countries have established NHIs as part of a strategy to progress towards universal health coverage. The establishment of an NHI presents a potentially significant shift in national health sector governance, but little is available in the literature regarding how policymaking authority and health governance is shared between NHIs and ministries of health (MOHs). To answer this question, we conducted a descriptive, qualitative comparative analysis of policies, including legislation, guidelines and webpages, from four sub-Saharan African countries that have established or are in the process of establishing an NHI scheme as of 2019 (Ghana, Kenya, Zambia and South Africa). We developed a novel conceptual framework comprising 16 NHI policy domains and conducted a deductive review of relevant policies. We then extracted and indexed policy elements according to this framework to facilitate comparative analysis. We found substantial variation across countries in the types of policies developed and the decision-making authority around those policies. MOHs in all four countries retained at least some decision-making power over the NHIs through regulations and appointment of board members. However, NHIs were often delegated policymaking authority in key areas including financing mechanisms, provider payments, member payments, benefit schemes, accreditation and relationships with private health insurance schemes. The results of this analysis illustrate many aspects of health regulatory power and oversight that will need to be defined as part of establishing NHIs. The approaches from these four countries and the conceptual framework presented in this manuscript may be helpful for other countries in evaluating differing approaches to shared health governance between NHIs and MOHs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33837404
pii: 6219661
doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa160
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1246-1256

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Amy Roll (A)

Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Hans Rosling Center, Global Health, UW Box #351620, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

Aaron Katz (A)

Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Hans Rosling Center, 3980 15th Ave NE, Fourth Floor Box 351621, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

Jeff Lane (J)

Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Hans Rosling Center, Global Health, UW Box #351620, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH