An international tool to measure perceived stressors in intensive care units: the PS-ICU scale.
Health care professionals
Intensive care unit
Job stress
PS-ICU scale
Journal
Annals of intensive care
ISSN: 2110-5820
Titre abrégé: Ann Intensive Care
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101562873
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Apr 2021
10 Apr 2021
Historique:
received:
14
12
2020
accepted:
29
03
2021
entrez:
10
4
2021
pubmed:
11
4
2021
medline:
11
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The intensive care unit is increasingly recognized as a stressful environment for healthcare professionals. This context has an impact on the health of these professionals but also on the quality of their personal and professional life. However, there is currently no validated scale to measure specific stressors perceived by healthcare professionals in intensive care. The aim of this study was to construct and validate in three languages a perceived stressors scale more specific to intensive care units (ICU). We conducted a three-phase study between 2016 and 2019: (1) identification of stressors based on the verbatim of 165 nurses and physicians from 4 countries (Canada, France, Italy, and Spain). We identified 99 stressors, including those common to most healthcare professions (called generic), as well as stressors more specific to ICU professionals (called specific); (2) item elaboration and selection by a panel of interdisciplinary experts to build a provisional 99-item version of the scale. This version was pre-tested with 70 professionals in the 4 countries and enabled us to select 50 relevant items; (3) test of the validity of the scale in 497 ICU healthcare professionals. Factor analyses identified six dimensions: lack of fit with families and organizational functioning; patient- and family-related emotional load; complex/at risk situations and skill-related issues; workload and human resource management issues; difficulties related to team working; and suboptimal care situations. Correlations of the PS-ICU scale with a generic stressors measure (i.e., the Job Content Questionnaire) tested its convergent validity, while its correlations with the Maslach Burnout Inventory-HSS examined its concurrent validity. We also assessed the test-retest reliability of PS-ICU with intraclass correlation coefficients. The perceived stressors in intensive care units (PS-ICU) scale have good psychometric properties in all countries. It includes six broad dimensions covering generic or specific stressors to ICU, and thus, enables the identification of work situations that are likely to generate high levels of stress at the individual and unit levels. For future studies, this tool will enable the implementation of targeted corrective actions on which intervention research can be based. It also enables national and international comparisons of stressors' impact.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The intensive care unit is increasingly recognized as a stressful environment for healthcare professionals. This context has an impact on the health of these professionals but also on the quality of their personal and professional life. However, there is currently no validated scale to measure specific stressors perceived by healthcare professionals in intensive care. The aim of this study was to construct and validate in three languages a perceived stressors scale more specific to intensive care units (ICU).
RESULTS
RESULTS
We conducted a three-phase study between 2016 and 2019: (1) identification of stressors based on the verbatim of 165 nurses and physicians from 4 countries (Canada, France, Italy, and Spain). We identified 99 stressors, including those common to most healthcare professions (called generic), as well as stressors more specific to ICU professionals (called specific); (2) item elaboration and selection by a panel of interdisciplinary experts to build a provisional 99-item version of the scale. This version was pre-tested with 70 professionals in the 4 countries and enabled us to select 50 relevant items; (3) test of the validity of the scale in 497 ICU healthcare professionals. Factor analyses identified six dimensions: lack of fit with families and organizational functioning; patient- and family-related emotional load; complex/at risk situations and skill-related issues; workload and human resource management issues; difficulties related to team working; and suboptimal care situations. Correlations of the PS-ICU scale with a generic stressors measure (i.e., the Job Content Questionnaire) tested its convergent validity, while its correlations with the Maslach Burnout Inventory-HSS examined its concurrent validity. We also assessed the test-retest reliability of PS-ICU with intraclass correlation coefficients.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The perceived stressors in intensive care units (PS-ICU) scale have good psychometric properties in all countries. It includes six broad dimensions covering generic or specific stressors to ICU, and thus, enables the identification of work situations that are likely to generate high levels of stress at the individual and unit levels. For future studies, this tool will enable the implementation of targeted corrective actions on which intervention research can be based. It also enables national and international comparisons of stressors' impact.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33837861
doi: 10.1186/s13613-021-00846-0
pii: 10.1186/s13613-021-00846-0
pmc: PMC8036172
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
57Références
Ann Intensive Care. 2012 Jul 27;2(1):34
pubmed: 22839744
Gac Sanit. 2001 Mar-Apr;15(2):142-9
pubmed: 11333640
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 31;11:84
pubmed: 32082226
Sante Publique. 2006 Sep;18(3):413-27
pubmed: 17094683
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 1998 Dec;12(3):67-73
pubmed: 10326434
Intensive Care Med. 2008 Jan;34(1):152-6
pubmed: 17943271
J Nurs Meas. 2008;16(3):207-30
pubmed: 19886473
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Nov;40(11):1785-6
pubmed: 25164397
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Apr 1;175(7):698-704
pubmed: 17110646
Rev Saude Publica. 2005 Feb;39(1):1-8
pubmed: 15654454
Crit Care Med. 2017 Dec;45(12):2023-2030
pubmed: 28938252
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Apr 1;175(7):686-92
pubmed: 17234905
Crit Care Res Pract. 2013;2013:786176
pubmed: 24303211
J Occup Health Psychol. 1998 Oct;3(4):322-55
pubmed: 9805280
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2002 Aug;8(4):316-20
pubmed: 12386492
West J Emerg Med. 2019 May;20(3):485-494
pubmed: 31123550
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 31;10(8):e0136955
pubmed: 26322644
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 12;11:245
pubmed: 32226400
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Jul 1;194(1):106-13
pubmed: 27367887
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 12;9(12):e114987
pubmed: 25501716
Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan;35(1):165-76
pubmed: 17110876
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Apr;58(8):1483-99
pubmed: 14759692
Stat Med. 2002 May 15;21(9):1331-5
pubmed: 12111881
J Intensive Care. 2017 Feb 2;5:16
pubmed: 28174662