An international tool to measure perceived stressors in intensive care units: the PS-ICU scale.

Health care professionals Intensive care unit Job stress PS-ICU scale

Journal

Annals of intensive care
ISSN: 2110-5820
Titre abrégé: Ann Intensive Care
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101562873

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 Apr 2021
Historique:
received: 14 12 2020
accepted: 29 03 2021
entrez: 10 4 2021
pubmed: 11 4 2021
medline: 11 4 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The intensive care unit is increasingly recognized as a stressful environment for healthcare professionals. This context has an impact on the health of these professionals but also on the quality of their personal and professional life. However, there is currently no validated scale to measure specific stressors perceived by healthcare professionals in intensive care. The aim of this study was to construct and validate in three languages a perceived stressors scale more specific to intensive care units (ICU). We conducted a three-phase study between 2016 and 2019: (1) identification of stressors based on the verbatim of 165 nurses and physicians from 4 countries (Canada, France, Italy, and Spain). We identified 99 stressors, including those common to most healthcare professions (called generic), as well as stressors more specific to ICU professionals (called specific); (2) item elaboration and selection by a panel of interdisciplinary experts to build a provisional 99-item version of the scale. This version was pre-tested with 70 professionals in the 4 countries and enabled us to select 50 relevant items; (3) test of the validity of the scale in 497 ICU healthcare professionals. Factor analyses identified six dimensions: lack of fit with families and organizational functioning; patient- and family-related emotional load; complex/at risk situations and skill-related issues; workload and human resource management issues; difficulties related to team working; and suboptimal care situations. Correlations of the PS-ICU scale with a generic stressors measure (i.e., the Job Content Questionnaire) tested its convergent validity, while its correlations with the Maslach Burnout Inventory-HSS examined its concurrent validity. We also assessed the test-retest reliability of PS-ICU with intraclass correlation coefficients. The perceived stressors in intensive care units (PS-ICU) scale have good psychometric properties in all countries. It includes six broad dimensions covering generic or specific stressors to ICU, and thus, enables the identification of work situations that are likely to generate high levels of stress at the individual and unit levels. For future studies, this tool will enable the implementation of targeted corrective actions on which intervention research can be based. It also enables national and international comparisons of stressors' impact.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The intensive care unit is increasingly recognized as a stressful environment for healthcare professionals. This context has an impact on the health of these professionals but also on the quality of their personal and professional life. However, there is currently no validated scale to measure specific stressors perceived by healthcare professionals in intensive care. The aim of this study was to construct and validate in three languages a perceived stressors scale more specific to intensive care units (ICU).
RESULTS RESULTS
We conducted a three-phase study between 2016 and 2019: (1) identification of stressors based on the verbatim of 165 nurses and physicians from 4 countries (Canada, France, Italy, and Spain). We identified 99 stressors, including those common to most healthcare professions (called generic), as well as stressors more specific to ICU professionals (called specific); (2) item elaboration and selection by a panel of interdisciplinary experts to build a provisional 99-item version of the scale. This version was pre-tested with 70 professionals in the 4 countries and enabled us to select 50 relevant items; (3) test of the validity of the scale in 497 ICU healthcare professionals. Factor analyses identified six dimensions: lack of fit with families and organizational functioning; patient- and family-related emotional load; complex/at risk situations and skill-related issues; workload and human resource management issues; difficulties related to team working; and suboptimal care situations. Correlations of the PS-ICU scale with a generic stressors measure (i.e., the Job Content Questionnaire) tested its convergent validity, while its correlations with the Maslach Burnout Inventory-HSS examined its concurrent validity. We also assessed the test-retest reliability of PS-ICU with intraclass correlation coefficients.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The perceived stressors in intensive care units (PS-ICU) scale have good psychometric properties in all countries. It includes six broad dimensions covering generic or specific stressors to ICU, and thus, enables the identification of work situations that are likely to generate high levels of stress at the individual and unit levels. For future studies, this tool will enable the implementation of targeted corrective actions on which intervention research can be based. It also enables national and international comparisons of stressors' impact.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33837861
doi: 10.1186/s13613-021-00846-0
pii: 10.1186/s13613-021-00846-0
pmc: PMC8036172
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

57

Références

Ann Intensive Care. 2012 Jul 27;2(1):34
pubmed: 22839744
Gac Sanit. 2001 Mar-Apr;15(2):142-9
pubmed: 11333640
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 31;11:84
pubmed: 32082226
Sante Publique. 2006 Sep;18(3):413-27
pubmed: 17094683
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 1998 Dec;12(3):67-73
pubmed: 10326434
Intensive Care Med. 2008 Jan;34(1):152-6
pubmed: 17943271
J Nurs Meas. 2008;16(3):207-30
pubmed: 19886473
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Nov;40(11):1785-6
pubmed: 25164397
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Apr 1;175(7):698-704
pubmed: 17110646
Rev Saude Publica. 2005 Feb;39(1):1-8
pubmed: 15654454
Crit Care Med. 2017 Dec;45(12):2023-2030
pubmed: 28938252
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Apr 1;175(7):686-92
pubmed: 17234905
Crit Care Res Pract. 2013;2013:786176
pubmed: 24303211
J Occup Health Psychol. 1998 Oct;3(4):322-55
pubmed: 9805280
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2002 Aug;8(4):316-20
pubmed: 12386492
West J Emerg Med. 2019 May;20(3):485-494
pubmed: 31123550
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 31;10(8):e0136955
pubmed: 26322644
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 12;11:245
pubmed: 32226400
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Jul 1;194(1):106-13
pubmed: 27367887
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 12;9(12):e114987
pubmed: 25501716
Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan;35(1):165-76
pubmed: 17110876
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Apr;58(8):1483-99
pubmed: 14759692
Stat Med. 2002 May 15;21(9):1331-5
pubmed: 12111881
J Intensive Care. 2017 Feb 2;5:16
pubmed: 28174662

Auteurs

Alexandra Laurent (A)

Psy-DREPI Laboratory EA 7458, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France. alexandra.laurent@u-bourgogne.fr.
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital of Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France. alexandra.laurent@u-bourgogne.fr.

Alicia Fournier (A)

Psy-DREPI Laboratory EA 7458, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.
MSHE Ledoux, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.

Florent Lheureux (F)

Laboratory of Psychology EA3188, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté,, Dijon, France.

Maria Cruz Martin Delgado (MC)

Hospital Universitario de Torrejón, Intensive Care Unit, Madrid, Spain.
School of Medicine, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain.

Maria G Bocci (MG)

Dipartimento di Scienze dell'Emergenza, Anestesiologiche e della Rianimazione, Rome, Italy.
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Alessia Prestifilippo (A)

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Pierre Aslanian (P)

Intensive Care Unit of Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Julie Henriques (J)

Methodology and Quality of Life in Oncology Unit (INSERM UMR 1098), University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.

Sophie Paget-Bailly (S)

Methodology and Quality of Life in Oncology Unit (INSERM UMR 1098), University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.

Jean-Michel Constantin (JM)

Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, GRC 29, AP-HP, DMU DREAM, Paris, France.

Guillaume Besch (G)

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Besançon, University of Franche-Comte EA3920, Besançon, France.

Jean-Pierre Quenot (JP)

Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, University Hospital of Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.

Amelie Anota (A)

Methodology and Quality of Life in Oncology Unit (INSERM UMR 1098), University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.

Belaid Bouhemad (B)

Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital of Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.

Gilles Capellier (G)

Medical Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Besançon, University of Franche-Comte EA 3920, Besançon, France.

Classifications MeSH