Trimodality Therapy With or Without Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.


Journal

Clinical genitourinary cancer
ISSN: 1938-0682
Titre abrégé: Clin Genitourin Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101260955

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2021
Historique:
received: 24 12 2020
revised: 12 02 2021
accepted: 03 03 2021
pubmed: 12 4 2021
medline: 11 9 2021
entrez: 11 4 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Bladder-sparing chemoradiation therapy is a definitive first-line treatment option for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Randomized trials have demonstrated that the addition of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to radical cystectomy or radiation monotherapy results in a survival benefit. Whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves outcomes when used with definitive chemoradiation is unknown. We identified 2566 patients in the National Cancer Data Base with cT2-4N0M0 urothelial cell carcinoma of the bladder treated with definitive intent concurrent chemoradiation from 2004 to 2015. The exposure of interest was receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus those without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The primary outcome was overall survival defined from the time of diagnosis. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to compare survival between groups. Sensitivity analyses tested (1) an interaction term for clinical T stage and (2) defining survival from start of radiation (as opposed to time of diagnosis) to address potential leading time bias. We identified 462 patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation and 2104 patients treated with chemoradiation alone. With a median follow-up of 6.2 years, we found no difference in survival between groups: 5-year or 10-year overall survival of 30.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.4%-32.9%) in the neoadjuvant group versus 31.8% (95% CI, 27.0%-36.8%) in the standard chemoradiation therapy group and 13.3% (95% CI, 11.2%-15.5%) in the neoadjuvant group versus 13.0% (95% CI, 8.4%-18.7%) in the standard chemoradiation therapy group, respectively (log-rank P = .19). On multivariable analysis we found no association between receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.88-1.15; P = .921). The sensitivity analyses did not identify any differential effect by clinical T stage nor by defining survival from start of radiation. These results do not support the routine addition of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to definitive chemoradiation for bladder cancer, and optimizing the chemotherapy sequencing and regimens for bladder-preserving approaches to muscle invasive bladder cancer should continue to be studied under prospective clinical trials.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Bladder-sparing chemoradiation therapy is a definitive first-line treatment option for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Randomized trials have demonstrated that the addition of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to radical cystectomy or radiation monotherapy results in a survival benefit. Whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves outcomes when used with definitive chemoradiation is unknown.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
We identified 2566 patients in the National Cancer Data Base with cT2-4N0M0 urothelial cell carcinoma of the bladder treated with definitive intent concurrent chemoradiation from 2004 to 2015. The exposure of interest was receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus those without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The primary outcome was overall survival defined from the time of diagnosis. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to compare survival between groups. Sensitivity analyses tested (1) an interaction term for clinical T stage and (2) defining survival from start of radiation (as opposed to time of diagnosis) to address potential leading time bias.
RESULTS
We identified 462 patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation and 2104 patients treated with chemoradiation alone. With a median follow-up of 6.2 years, we found no difference in survival between groups: 5-year or 10-year overall survival of 30.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.4%-32.9%) in the neoadjuvant group versus 31.8% (95% CI, 27.0%-36.8%) in the standard chemoradiation therapy group and 13.3% (95% CI, 11.2%-15.5%) in the neoadjuvant group versus 13.0% (95% CI, 8.4%-18.7%) in the standard chemoradiation therapy group, respectively (log-rank P = .19). On multivariable analysis we found no association between receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.88-1.15; P = .921). The sensitivity analyses did not identify any differential effect by clinical T stage nor by defining survival from start of radiation.
CONCLUSION
These results do not support the routine addition of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to definitive chemoradiation for bladder cancer, and optimizing the chemotherapy sequencing and regimens for bladder-preserving approaches to muscle invasive bladder cancer should continue to be studied under prospective clinical trials.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33839040
pii: S1558-7673(21)00070-7
doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.03.007
pmc: PMC8376795
mid: NIHMS1721185
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

362-368

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : K12 CA120780
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA138292
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Références

Eur Urol. 2004 Mar;45(3):297-303
pubmed: 15036674
J Clin Oncol. 1996 Jan;14(1):119-26
pubmed: 8558186
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2015 Apr;29(2):289-300, ix
pubmed: 25836935
World J Urol. 2019 Jan;37(1):61-83
pubmed: 30684034
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Nov;16(11):3576-83
pubmed: 9817278
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Mar;15(3):683-90
pubmed: 18183467
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Sep 1;27(25):4177-81
pubmed: 19636004
Eur Urol. 2021 Feb;79(2):307-315
pubmed: 33293079
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Feb;17(1):38-45
pubmed: 30686350
Nat Rev Urol. 2017 Sep;14(9):565-574
pubmed: 28675174
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;3(12):1722-1728
pubmed: 28241198
Urol Oncol. 2018 Feb;36(2):78.e1-78.e12
pubmed: 29162314
Eur Urol. 2017 Jun;71(6):952-960
pubmed: 28081860
N Engl J Med. 2003 Aug 28;349(9):859-66
pubmed: 12944571
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 1;29(16):2171-7
pubmed: 21502557
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30
pubmed: 31912902
Lancet. 2003 Jun 7;361(9373):1927-34
pubmed: 12801735
F1000Res. 2018 Dec 19;7:1955
pubmed: 31231506
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Aug 20;38(24):2709-2711
pubmed: 32459596
N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 19;366(16):1477-88
pubmed: 22512481
Cancer. 2017 Oct 1;123(19):3816-3824
pubmed: 28621885
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Feb;17(1):23-31.e3
pubmed: 30482661

Auteurs

Trevor J Royce (TJ)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. Electronic address: trevor_royce@med.unc.edu.

Yuan Liu (Y)

Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

Matthew I Milowsky (MI)

Department Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.

Jason A Efstathiou (JA)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

Ashesh B Jani (AB)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

Benjamin Fischer-Valuck (B)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

Sagar A Patel (SA)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH