Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Assessed with a Multi-Window Weighted Approach Adapted for Prospective Use: A Validation Study.
Autoregulation
CPPopt
Neuromonitoring
Precision medicine
Traumatic brain injury (TBI)
Journal
Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement
ISSN: 0065-1419
Titre abrégé: Acta Neurochir Suppl
Pays: Austria
ID NLM: 100962752
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
entrez:
11
4
2021
pubmed:
12
4
2021
medline:
5
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Pressure reactivity index (PRx)-cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) relationships over a given time period can be used to detect a value of CPP at which PRx shows the best autoregulation (optimal CPP, or CPPopt). Algorithms for continuous assessment of CPPopt in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients reached the desired high yield with a multi-window approach (CPPopt_MA). However, the calculations were tested on retrospective manually cleaned datasets. Moreover, CPPopt false-positive values can be generated from non-physiological variations of intracranial pressure (ICP) and arterial blood pressure (ABP). Therefore, the algorithm robustness was improved, making it suitable for prospective bedside application (COGiTATE trial). To validate the CPPopt revised algorithm in a large single-centre retrospective cohort of TBI patients. 840 TBI patients were included. CPPopt yield, stability and ability to discriminate outcome groups were compared to CPPopt_MA and the Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF) guideline reference. CPPopt yield was lower than CPPopt_MA yield (85% and 90%, p < 0.001), but, importantly, with increased stability (p < 0.0001). The ∆(CPP-CPPopt) could distinguish the mortality and survival outcome (t = -6.7, p < 0.0001) with a statistical significance higher than the ∆CPP calculated with the guideline reference (CPP-60) (t = -4.5, p < 0.0001). This study validates, on a large cohort of patients, the new algorithm proposed for prospective use of CPPopt as a CPP target at bedside.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Pressure reactivity index (PRx)-cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) relationships over a given time period can be used to detect a value of CPP at which PRx shows the best autoregulation (optimal CPP, or CPPopt). Algorithms for continuous assessment of CPPopt in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients reached the desired high yield with a multi-window approach (CPPopt_MA). However, the calculations were tested on retrospective manually cleaned datasets. Moreover, CPPopt false-positive values can be generated from non-physiological variations of intracranial pressure (ICP) and arterial blood pressure (ABP). Therefore, the algorithm robustness was improved, making it suitable for prospective bedside application (COGiTATE trial).
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
To validate the CPPopt revised algorithm in a large single-centre retrospective cohort of TBI patients.
METHODS
METHODS
840 TBI patients were included. CPPopt yield, stability and ability to discriminate outcome groups were compared to CPPopt_MA and the Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF) guideline reference.
RESULTS
RESULTS
CPPopt yield was lower than CPPopt_MA yield (85% and 90%, p < 0.001), but, importantly, with increased stability (p < 0.0001). The ∆(CPP-CPPopt) could distinguish the mortality and survival outcome (t = -6.7, p < 0.0001) with a statistical significance higher than the ∆CPP calculated with the guideline reference (CPP-60) (t = -4.5, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This study validates, on a large cohort of patients, the new algorithm proposed for prospective use of CPPopt as a CPP target at bedside.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33839842
doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-59436-7_36
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
181-185Références
Liu X, Maurits NM, Aries MJH et al (2017) Monitoring of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in traumatic brain injured patients using a multi-window weighting algorithm. J Neurotrauma 34(22):3081–3088
doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5003
Cabeleira M, Czosnyka M, Liu X, Donnelly J, Smielewski P (2018) Occurrence of CPPopt values in uncorrelated ICP and ABP time series. Acta Neurochir Suppl.:143–146
Beqiri E, Smielewski P, Robba C et al (2019) Feasibility of individualised severe traumatic brain injury management using an automated assessment of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure: the COGiTATE phase II study protocol. BMJ Open 9(9):e030727
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030727
Carney N, Totten AM, Hawryluk GWJ et al (2016) Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury, 4th edn
Depreitere B, Güiza F, Van Den BG, Schuhmann MU, Maier G, Piper I, Meyfroidt G (2014) Pressure autoregulation monitoring and cerebral perfusion pressure target recommendation in patients with severe traumatic brain injury based on minute-by-minute monitoring data. J Neurosurg 120(120):1451–1457
doi: 10.3171/2014.3.JNS131500
Aries MJH, Czosnyka M, Budohoski KP et al (2012) Continuous determination of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in traumatic brain injury*. Crit Care Med. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182514eb6