Lower Breakpoint of Intracranial Amplitude-Pressure Relationship in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus.
Hydrocephalus
Infusion test
Intracranial pressure
Pulse amplitude
Journal
Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement
ISSN: 0065-1419
Titre abrégé: Acta Neurochir Suppl
Pays: Austria
ID NLM: 100962752
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
entrez:
11
4
2021
pubmed:
12
4
2021
medline:
8
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The relationship between intracranial pulse amplitude (AMP) and mean intracranial pressure (ICP) has been previously described. Generally, AMP increases proportionally to rises in ICP. However, at low ICP a lower breakpoint (LB) of amplitude-pressure relationship can be observed, below which pulse amplitude stays constant when ICP varies. Theoretically, below this breakpoint, the pressure-volume relationship is linear (good compensatory reserve, brain compliance stays constant); above the breakpoint, it is exponential (brain compliance decreases with rising ICP).Infusion tests performed in 169 patients diagnosed for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) during the period 2004-2013 were available for analysis. A lower breakpoint was observed in 62 patients diagnosed for iNPH. Improvement after shunt surgery in patients in whom LB was recorded was 77% versus 90% in patients where LB was absent (p < 0.02). There was no correlation between improvement and slope of amplitude-pressure line above LB.The detection of a lower breakpoint is associated with less frequent improvement after shunting in NPH. It may be interpreted that cerebrospinal fluid dynamics of patients working on the flat part of the pressure-volume curve and having a 'luxurious' compensatory reserve, are more frequently caused by brain atrophy, which is obviously not responding to shunting.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33839863
doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-59436-7_57
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
307-309Références
Marmarou A, Shulman K, Rosende RM (1978) A nonlinear analysis of the cerebrospinal fluid system and intracranial pressure dynamics. J Neurosurg 48(3):332–344
doi: 10.3171/jns.1978.48.3.0332
Qvarlander S, Lundkvist B, Koskinen LO, Malm J, Eklund A (2013) Pulsatility in CSF dynamics: pathophysiology of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 84(7):735–741
doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-302924
Szewczykowski J, Sliwka S, Kunicki A, Dytko P, Korsak-Sliwka J (1977) A fast method of estimating the elastance of the intracranial system. J Neurosurg 47(1):19–26
doi: 10.3171/jns.1977.47.1.0019
Czosnyka M, Price DJ, Williamson M (1994) Monitoring of cerebrospinal dynamics using continuous analysis of intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure in head injury. Acta Neurochir 126(2–4):113–119
doi: 10.1007/BF01476419
Anile C, De Bonis P, Albanese A, Di Chirico A, Mangiola A, Petrella G, Santini P (2010) Selection of patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus for shunt placement: a single-institution experience. J Neurosurg 113(1):64–73
doi: 10.3171/2010.1.JNS091296
Löfgren J, von Essen C, Zwetnow NN (1973) The pressure-volume curve of the cerebrospinal fluid space in dogs. Acta Neurol Scand 49(5):557–574
pubmed: 4770652
Shapiro K, Fried A, Marmarou A (1985) Biomechanical and hydrodynamic characterization of the hydrocephalic infant. J Neurosurg 63(1):69–75
doi: 10.3171/jns.1985.63.1.0069