Revisiting Activity of Some Nocodazole Analogues as a Potential Anticancer Drugs Using Molecular Docking and DFT Calculations.
DFT calcualtions
anthelminthic
anticancer
drug repurposing
molecular docking
tubulin inhibitors
Journal
Frontiers in chemistry
ISSN: 2296-2646
Titre abrégé: Front Chem
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101627988
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
11
11
2020
accepted:
02
02
2021
entrez:
12
4
2021
pubmed:
13
4
2021
medline:
13
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Although potential anticancer activities of benzimidazole-based anthelmintic drugs have been approved by preclinical and clinical studies, modes of binding interactions have not been reported so far. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to propose binding interactions of some benzimidazole-based anthelmintics with one of the most important cancer targets (Tubulin protein). Studied drugs were selected based on their structural similarity with the cocrystallized ligand (Nocodazole) with tubulin protein. Quantum mechanics calculations were also employed for characterization of electronic configuration of studied drugs at the atomic and molecular level. Order of binding affinities of tested benzimidazole drugs toward colchicine binding site on tubulin protein is as follows: Flubendazole > Oxfendazole > Nocodazole > Mebendazole > Albendazole > Oxibendazole > Fenbendazole > Ciclobendazole > Thiabendazole > Bendazole. By analyzing binding mode and hydrogen bond length between the nine studied benzimidazole drugs and colchicine binding site, Flubendazole was found to bind more efficiently with tubulin protein than other benzimidazole derivatives. The quantum mechanics studies showed that the electron density of HOMO of Flubendazole and Mebendazole together with their MEP map are quite similar to that of Nocodazole which is also consistent with the calculated binding affinities. Our study has ramifications for considering the repurposing of Flubendazole as a promising anticancer candidate.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33842429
doi: 10.3389/fchem.2021.628398
pii: 628398
pmc: PMC8024586
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
628398Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Khattab and Al‐Karmalawy.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Nov 17;13:E157
pubmed: 27854420
Clin Transl Sci. 2018 Nov;11(6):597-606
pubmed: 29940695
Int J Parasitol. 2010 Jan;40(1):1-13
pubmed: 19932111
Curr Pharm Des. 2012;18(19):2778-92
pubmed: 22390762
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2020 Jan 03;13(1):
pubmed: 31947889
Clin Cancer Res. 2002 Sep;8(9):2963-9
pubmed: 12231542
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Aug 31;11(9):
pubmed: 31480477
Parasitol Today. 1990 Apr;6(4):112-5
pubmed: 15463312
Transl Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Jun;27(2):59-63
pubmed: 32055582
FEBS J. 2016 Jan;283(1):102-11
pubmed: 26462166
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019 Jan;18(1):41-58
pubmed: 30310233
Drug Discov Today. 2019 Mar;24(3):789-795
pubmed: 30513339
Nat Biotechnol. 2014 Jan;32(1):40-51
pubmed: 24406927
Eur J Med Chem. 2015 Jun 5;97:419-43
pubmed: 25479684
Anticancer Drugs. 2013 Oct;24(9):911-9
pubmed: 23884106
Int J Parasitol. 2001 Apr;31(4):336-45
pubmed: 11400692
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2005 Dec;62(24):3039-56
pubmed: 16314924
Heliyon. 2020 Jun 06;6(6):e04055
pubmed: 32548318
J Comput Chem. 2003 Apr 30;24(6):669-81
pubmed: 12666158