Blood-based host biomarker diagnostics in active case finding for pulmonary tuberculosis: A diagnostic case-control study.
Active case finding
Biomarker
Diagnostic
Host response
Triage
Tuberculosis
Journal
EClinicalMedicine
ISSN: 2589-5370
Titre abrégé: EClinicalMedicine
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101733727
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
31
12
2020
revised:
11
02
2021
accepted:
12
02
2021
entrez:
12
4
2021
pubmed:
13
4
2021
medline:
13
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There is a need to identify scalable tuberculosis screening strategies among high burden populations. The WHO has identified a non-sputum-based triage test as a development priority. We performed a diagnostic case-control study of point-of-care C-reactive protein (CRP) and Prototype-Xpert-MTB-Host-Response (Xpert-MTB-HR) assays in the context of a mass screening program for tuberculosis in two prisons in Brazil. All incarcerated individuals irrespective of symptoms were screened by sputum Xpert MTB/RIF and sputum culture. Among consecutive, Xpert MTB/RIF or culture-confirmed cases and Xpert MTB/RIF and culture-negative controls, CRP was quantified in serum by a point-of-care assay (iChroma-II) and a 3-gene expression score was quantified from whole blood using the Xpert-MTB-HR cartridge. We evaluated receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) and assessed specificity at 90% sensitivity and sensitivity at 70% specificity, consistent with WHO target product profile (TPP) benchmarks. Two hundred controls (no TB) and 100 culture- or Xpert MTB/RIF-positive tuberculosis cases were included. Half of tuberculosis cases and 11% of controls reported any tuberculosis symptoms. AUC for CRP was 0·79 (95% CI: 0·73-0·84) and for Xpert-MTB-HR was 0·84 (95% CI: 0·79-0·89). At 90% sensitivity, Xpert-MTB-HR had significantly higher specificity (53·0%, 95% CI: 45·0-69·0%) than CRP (28·1%, 95% CI: 20·2-41·8%) ( For active case finding in this high tuberculosis-burden setting, CRP and Xpert-MTB-HR did not meet TPP benchmarks for a triage test. However, Xpert-MTB-HR was highly sensitive in detecting individuals with medium or high sputum bacillary burden. National Institutes of Health (R01 AI130058 and R01 AI149620) and Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq-404182/2019-4).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
There is a need to identify scalable tuberculosis screening strategies among high burden populations. The WHO has identified a non-sputum-based triage test as a development priority.
METHODS
METHODS
We performed a diagnostic case-control study of point-of-care C-reactive protein (CRP) and Prototype-Xpert-MTB-Host-Response (Xpert-MTB-HR) assays in the context of a mass screening program for tuberculosis in two prisons in Brazil. All incarcerated individuals irrespective of symptoms were screened by sputum Xpert MTB/RIF and sputum culture. Among consecutive, Xpert MTB/RIF or culture-confirmed cases and Xpert MTB/RIF and culture-negative controls, CRP was quantified in serum by a point-of-care assay (iChroma-II) and a 3-gene expression score was quantified from whole blood using the Xpert-MTB-HR cartridge. We evaluated receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) and assessed specificity at 90% sensitivity and sensitivity at 70% specificity, consistent with WHO target product profile (TPP) benchmarks.
FINDINGS
RESULTS
Two hundred controls (no TB) and 100 culture- or Xpert MTB/RIF-positive tuberculosis cases were included. Half of tuberculosis cases and 11% of controls reported any tuberculosis symptoms. AUC for CRP was 0·79 (95% CI: 0·73-0·84) and for Xpert-MTB-HR was 0·84 (95% CI: 0·79-0·89). At 90% sensitivity, Xpert-MTB-HR had significantly higher specificity (53·0%, 95% CI: 45·0-69·0%) than CRP (28·1%, 95% CI: 20·2-41·8%) (
INTERPRETATION
CONCLUSIONS
For active case finding in this high tuberculosis-burden setting, CRP and Xpert-MTB-HR did not meet TPP benchmarks for a triage test. However, Xpert-MTB-HR was highly sensitive in detecting individuals with medium or high sputum bacillary burden.
FUNDING
BACKGROUND
National Institutes of Health (R01 AI130058 and R01 AI149620) and Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq-404182/2019-4).
Identifiants
pubmed: 33842866
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100776
pii: S2589-5370(21)00056-0
pmc: PMC8020164
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100776Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R01 AI130058
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R01 AI149620
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Author(s).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
JRA received grants from the U.S. National Institutes of Health to support this research. PK is a co-inventor on a 3-gene TB score pending patent owned by Stanford University, which has been licensed for commercialization. PK is a consultant with Cepheid. DHP, ES, and DG are employed by Cepheid. Xpert-MTB-HR cartridges were provided by Cepheid. Cepheid had no role in selection of participants, assay performance and interpretation, or data analysis, and did not have access to the study results until all analyses were completed.
Références
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Dec 17;59(1):
pubmed: 33087439
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014 Apr 15;65(5):551-6
pubmed: 24346636
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Oct 5;1(6):e183779
pubmed: 30646264
PLoS Med. 2010 Dec 21;7(12):e1000381
pubmed: 21203587
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Feb 18;59(3):
pubmed: 33298607
Nat Microbiol. 2019 May;4(5):748-758
pubmed: 30804546
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 May 1;197(9):1198-1208
pubmed: 29624071
BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Mar 04;14:125
pubmed: 24592945
J Infect. 2017 Dec;75(6):499-510
pubmed: 28941629
Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Dec;17(12):1285-1292
pubmed: 28847636
Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Mar;4(3):213-24
pubmed: 26907218
BMC Infect Dis. 2015 Jan 22;15:24
pubmed: 25608746
PLoS Med. 2019 Apr 23;16(4):e1002786
pubmed: 31013272
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Apr;8(4):395-406
pubmed: 31958400
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Mar 17;12:77
pubmed: 21414208
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 26;8(1):5201
pubmed: 29581435
Thorax. 2004 Apr;59(4):286-90
pubmed: 15047946
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Mar 1;199(5):643-650
pubmed: 30192649
Lancet. 2016 Jun 4;387(10035):2312-2322
pubmed: 27017310
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Mar 1;72(5):771-777
pubmed: 32064514
Lancet. 1999 Feb 6;353(9151):444-9
pubmed: 9989714
BMJ. 2015 Oct 28;351:h5527
pubmed: 26511519