Knowledge About COVID-19 Among Adults in China: Cross-sectional Online Survey.


Journal

Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 04 2021
Historique:
received: 04 01 2021
accepted: 11 04 2021
revised: 16 02 2021
pubmed: 13 4 2021
medline: 19 5 2021
entrez: 12 4 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

A detailed understanding of the public's knowledge and perceptions of COVID-19 could inform governments' public health actions in response to the pandemic. The aim of this study was to determine the knowledge and perceptions of COVID-19 among adults in China and its variation among provinces and by sociodemographic characteristics. Between May 8 and June 8, 2020, we conducted a cross-sectional online survey among adults in China who were registered with the private survey company KuRunData. We set a target sample size of 10,000 adults, aiming to sample 300-360 adults from each province in China. Participants were asked 25 questions that tested their knowledge about COVID-19, including measures to prevent infection, common symptoms, and recommended care-seeking behavior. We disaggregated responses by age; sex; education; province; household income; rural-urban residency; and whether or not a participant had a family member, friend, or acquaintance who they know to have been infected with SARS-CoV-2. All analyses used survey sampling weights. There were 5079 men and 4921 women who completed the questionnaire and were included in the analysis. Out of 25 knowledge questions, participants answered a mean and median of 21.4 (95% CI 21.3-21.4) and 22 (IQR 20-23) questions correctly, respectively. A total of 83.4% (95% CI 82.7%-84.1%) of participants answered four-fifths or more of the questions correctly. For at least one of four ineffective prevention measures (using a hand dryer, regular nasal irrigation, gargling mouthwash, and taking antibiotics), 68.9% (95% CI 68.0%-69.8%) of participants answered that it was an effective method to prevent a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Although knowledge overall was similar across provinces, the percent of participants who answered the question on recommended care-seeking behavior correctly varied from 47.0% (95% CI 41.4%-52.7%) in Tibet to 87.5% (95% CI 84.1%-91.0%) in Beijing. Within provinces, participants who were male, were middle-aged, were residing in urban areas, and had higher household income tended to answer a higher proportion of the knowledge questions correctly. This online study of individuals across China suggests that the majority of the population has good knowledge of COVID-19. However, a substantial proportion still holds misconceptions or incorrect beliefs about prevention methods and recommended health care-seeking behaviors, especially in rural areas and some less wealthy provinces in Western China. This study can inform the development of tailored public health policies and promotion campaigns by identifying knowledge areas for which misconceptions are comparatively common and provinces that have relatively low knowledge.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
A detailed understanding of the public's knowledge and perceptions of COVID-19 could inform governments' public health actions in response to the pandemic.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to determine the knowledge and perceptions of COVID-19 among adults in China and its variation among provinces and by sociodemographic characteristics.
METHODS
Between May 8 and June 8, 2020, we conducted a cross-sectional online survey among adults in China who were registered with the private survey company KuRunData. We set a target sample size of 10,000 adults, aiming to sample 300-360 adults from each province in China. Participants were asked 25 questions that tested their knowledge about COVID-19, including measures to prevent infection, common symptoms, and recommended care-seeking behavior. We disaggregated responses by age; sex; education; province; household income; rural-urban residency; and whether or not a participant had a family member, friend, or acquaintance who they know to have been infected with SARS-CoV-2. All analyses used survey sampling weights.
RESULTS
There were 5079 men and 4921 women who completed the questionnaire and were included in the analysis. Out of 25 knowledge questions, participants answered a mean and median of 21.4 (95% CI 21.3-21.4) and 22 (IQR 20-23) questions correctly, respectively. A total of 83.4% (95% CI 82.7%-84.1%) of participants answered four-fifths or more of the questions correctly. For at least one of four ineffective prevention measures (using a hand dryer, regular nasal irrigation, gargling mouthwash, and taking antibiotics), 68.9% (95% CI 68.0%-69.8%) of participants answered that it was an effective method to prevent a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Although knowledge overall was similar across provinces, the percent of participants who answered the question on recommended care-seeking behavior correctly varied from 47.0% (95% CI 41.4%-52.7%) in Tibet to 87.5% (95% CI 84.1%-91.0%) in Beijing. Within provinces, participants who were male, were middle-aged, were residing in urban areas, and had higher household income tended to answer a higher proportion of the knowledge questions correctly.
CONCLUSIONS
This online study of individuals across China suggests that the majority of the population has good knowledge of COVID-19. However, a substantial proportion still holds misconceptions or incorrect beliefs about prevention methods and recommended health care-seeking behaviors, especially in rural areas and some less wealthy provinces in Western China. This study can inform the development of tailored public health policies and promotion campaigns by identifying knowledge areas for which misconceptions are comparatively common and provinces that have relatively low knowledge.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33844637
pii: v23i4e26940
doi: 10.2196/26940
pmc: PMC8086781
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e26940

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

©Fengyun Yu, Pascal Geldsetzer, Anne Meierkord, Juntao Yang, Qiushi Chen, Lirui Jiao, Nadeem E Abou-Arraj, An Pan, Chen Wang, Till Bärnighausen, Simiao Chen. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 29.04.2021.

Références

Nature. 2020 May;581(7809):371-374
pubmed: 32461658
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):470-473
pubmed: 31986257
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 23;15(6):e0235112
pubmed: 32574184
J Community Health. 2020 Dec;45(6):1116-1122
pubmed: 32405905
Women Birth. 2021 May;34(3):212-218
pubmed: 32534906
Lancet. 2020 Apr 18;395(10232):1305-1314
pubmed: 32247320
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 2;22(4):e18790
pubmed: 32240094
Lancet. 2020 Mar 7;395(10226):764-766
pubmed: 32105609
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 May;20(5):533-534
pubmed: 32087114
PLoS One. 2020 May 21;15(5):e0233668
pubmed: 32437434
J Glob Health. 2020 Dec;10(2):020509
pubmed: 33110592
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Jul;8(7):e901-e908
pubmed: 32405459
JAMA. 2020 Oct 20;324(15):1495-1496
pubmed: 33044484
Gen Psychiatr. 2020 Jun 9;33(3):e100231
pubmed: 32574346
J Community Health. 2020 Oct;45(5):881-890
pubmed: 32318986
Engineering (Beijing). 2020 Oct;6(10):1108-1114
pubmed: 32983582
J Travel Med. 2021 Feb 23;28(2):
pubmed: 33274387
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 18;17(10):
pubmed: 32443430

Auteurs

Fengyun Yu (F)

Department of Industrial Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.

Pascal Geldsetzer (P)

Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.

Anne Meierkord (A)

Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.

Juntao Yang (J)

State Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Qiushi Chen (Q)

The Harold and Inge Marcus Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.

Lirui Jiao (L)

Reed College, Portland, OR, United States.

Nadeem E Abou-Arraj (NE)

Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.

An Pan (A)

School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Chen Wang (C)

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, Beijing, China.
Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Center of Respiratory Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.

Till Bärnighausen (T)

Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Simiao Chen (S)

Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH