Three in one: evolution of viviparity, coenocytic placenta and polyembryony in cyclostome bryozoans.
Coenocyte
Colonial invertebrates
Evolution
Placenta
Polyembryony
Viviparity
Journal
BMC ecology and evolution
ISSN: 2730-7182
Titre abrégé: BMC Ecol Evol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101775613
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 04 2021
12 04 2021
Historique:
received:
09
10
2020
accepted:
08
03
2021
entrez:
13
4
2021
pubmed:
14
4
2021
medline:
24
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Placentation has evolved multiple times among both chordates and invertebrates. Although they are structurally less complex, invertebrate placentae are much more diverse in their origin, development and position. Aquatic colonial suspension-feeders from the phylum Bryozoa acquired placental analogues multiple times, representing an outstanding example of their structural diversity and evolution. Among them, the clade Cyclostomata is the only one in which placentation is associated with viviparity and polyembryony-a unique combination not present in any other invertebrate group. The histological and ultrastructural study of the sexual polymorphic zooids (gonozooids) in two cyclostome species, Crisia eburnea and Crisiella producta, revealed embryos embedded in a placental analogue (nutritive tissue) with a unique structure-comprising coenocytes and solitary cells-previously unknown in animals. Coenocytes originate via nuclear multiplication and cytoplasmic growth among the cells surrounding the early embryo. This process also affects cells of the membranous sac, which initially serves as a hydrostatic system but later becomes main part of the placenta. The nutritive tissue is both highly dynamic, permanently rearranging its structure, and highly integrated with its coenocytic 'elements' being interconnected via cytoplasmic bridges and various cell contacts. This tissue shows evidence of both nutrient synthesis and transport (bidirectional transcytosis), supporting the enclosed multiple progeny. Growing primary embryo produces secondary embryos (via fission) that develop into larvae; both the secondary embyos and larvae show signs of endocytosis. Interzooidal communication pores are occupied by 1‒2 specialized pore-cells probably involved in the transport of nutrients between zooids. Cyclostome nutritive tissue is currently the only known example of a coenocytic placental analogue, although syncytial 'elements' could potentially be formed in them too. Structurally and functionally (but not developmentally) the nutritive tissue can be compared with the syncytial placental analogues of certain invertebrates and chordates. Evolution of the cyclostome placenta, involving transformation of the hydrostatic apparatus (membranous sac) and change of its function to embryonic nourishment, is an example of exaptation that is rather widespread among matrotrophic bryozoans. We speculate that the acquisition of a highly advanced placenta providing massive nourishment might support the evolution of polyembryony in cyclostomes. In turn, massive and continuous embryonic production led to the evolution of enlarged incubating polymorphic gonozooids hosting multiple progeny.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Placentation has evolved multiple times among both chordates and invertebrates. Although they are structurally less complex, invertebrate placentae are much more diverse in their origin, development and position. Aquatic colonial suspension-feeders from the phylum Bryozoa acquired placental analogues multiple times, representing an outstanding example of their structural diversity and evolution. Among them, the clade Cyclostomata is the only one in which placentation is associated with viviparity and polyembryony-a unique combination not present in any other invertebrate group.
RESULTS
The histological and ultrastructural study of the sexual polymorphic zooids (gonozooids) in two cyclostome species, Crisia eburnea and Crisiella producta, revealed embryos embedded in a placental analogue (nutritive tissue) with a unique structure-comprising coenocytes and solitary cells-previously unknown in animals. Coenocytes originate via nuclear multiplication and cytoplasmic growth among the cells surrounding the early embryo. This process also affects cells of the membranous sac, which initially serves as a hydrostatic system but later becomes main part of the placenta. The nutritive tissue is both highly dynamic, permanently rearranging its structure, and highly integrated with its coenocytic 'elements' being interconnected via cytoplasmic bridges and various cell contacts. This tissue shows evidence of both nutrient synthesis and transport (bidirectional transcytosis), supporting the enclosed multiple progeny. Growing primary embryo produces secondary embryos (via fission) that develop into larvae; both the secondary embyos and larvae show signs of endocytosis. Interzooidal communication pores are occupied by 1‒2 specialized pore-cells probably involved in the transport of nutrients between zooids.
CONCLUSIONS
Cyclostome nutritive tissue is currently the only known example of a coenocytic placental analogue, although syncytial 'elements' could potentially be formed in them too. Structurally and functionally (but not developmentally) the nutritive tissue can be compared with the syncytial placental analogues of certain invertebrates and chordates. Evolution of the cyclostome placenta, involving transformation of the hydrostatic apparatus (membranous sac) and change of its function to embryonic nourishment, is an example of exaptation that is rather widespread among matrotrophic bryozoans. We speculate that the acquisition of a highly advanced placenta providing massive nourishment might support the evolution of polyembryony in cyclostomes. In turn, massive and continuous embryonic production led to the evolution of enlarged incubating polymorphic gonozooids hosting multiple progeny.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33845757
doi: 10.1186/s12862-021-01775-z
pii: 10.1186/s12862-021-01775-z
pmc: PMC8042935
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
54Références
J Morphol. 1975 Nov;147(3):355-377
pubmed: 30301299
Reprod Biol. 2012 Nov;12(3):259-64
pubmed: 23153695
J Morphol. 1988 Feb;195(2):123-140
pubmed: 29890787
Int J Parasitol. 1998 Nov;28(11):1805-15
pubmed: 9846619
Tissue Cell. 1996 Oct;28(5):515-26
pubmed: 18621336
Int J Parasitol. 2002 Mar;32(3):255-80
pubmed: 11835969
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Nov 7;270 Suppl 2:S223-6
pubmed: 14667389
Biol Lett. 2005 Jun 22;1(2):178-80
pubmed: 17148160
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2003;4:213-35
pubmed: 14527302
J Morphol. 2002 Nov;254(2):121-31
pubmed: 12353296
J Morphol. 2019 Feb;280(2):278-299
pubmed: 30653716
Int J Dev Biol. 2003;47(7-8):633-42
pubmed: 14756339
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2020 Jun;95(3):696-729
pubmed: 32032476
Integr Comp Biol. 2006 Aug;46(4):398-406
pubmed: 21672752
Trends Ecol Evol. 1996;11(1):26
pubmed: 21237752
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1995 Feb;7(1):18-22
pubmed: 7755985
Equine Vet J. 2003 Jul;35(5):476-83
pubmed: 12875326
J Morphol. 2015 Aug;276(8):961-90
pubmed: 24652663
Ann Bot. 2004 Jul;94(1):9-32
pubmed: 15155376
Izv Akad Nauk Ser Biol. 2013 Mar-Apr;(2):161-73
pubmed: 23789422
Trends Ecol Evol. 1995 Sep;10(9):371-2
pubmed: 21237071
Theory Biosci. 2007 May;125(3-4):181-241
pubmed: 18236094
Zh Obshch Biol. 2008 Nov-Dec;69(6):403-27
pubmed: 19140332
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2016 Aug;91(3):673-711
pubmed: 25925633
J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2001 Jul-Aug;48(4):395-413
pubmed: 11456316
Reproduction. 2002 Mar;123(3):445-53
pubmed: 11882022
Trends Cell Biol. 2010 Oct;20(10):586-92
pubmed: 20674361
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 17;12(1):e0170010
pubmed: 28095467
BMC Evol Biol. 2018 Jun 14;18(1):92
pubmed: 29898669
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2006;7:61-80
pubmed: 16824020
Evodevo. 2012 Mar 19;3:7
pubmed: 22429930
Dev Biol. 2007 Oct 15;310(2):264-79
pubmed: 17716644
J Morphol. 2009 Dec;270(12):1413-30
pubmed: 19572311
Evolution. 2013 May;67(5):1368-82
pubmed: 23617914
Science. 1936 Dec 11;84(2189):533
pubmed: 17806555
Parasitol Res. 2012 Oct;111(4):1523-30
pubmed: 22733006
Adv Parasitol. 2007;64:161-376
pubmed: 17499102
J Morphol. 1950 Nov;87(3):553-606
pubmed: 24539340
J Morphol. 1995 May;224(2):179-198
pubmed: 29865325
Int J Parasitol. 1998 Jun;28(6):913-23
pubmed: 9673870
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2002 Dec;12(6):634-9
pubmed: 12433575
Front Zool. 2012 Oct 25;9(1):29
pubmed: 23098166
J Morphol. 2006 Oct;267(10):1227-47
pubmed: 16850472
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Jul;71(7):2848-52
pubmed: 4527913
Biol Bull. 1995 Jun;188(3):281-292
pubmed: 29281333
Placenta. 1985 Jan-Feb;6(1):53-63
pubmed: 3991475