Implementing immediate postpartum contraception: a comparative case study at 11 hospitals.
Contraception
Implementation
Long-acting reversible contraception
Maternity
Perinatal
Postpartum
Qualitative
Journal
Implementation science communications
ISSN: 2662-2211
Titre abrégé: Implement Sci Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101764360
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Apr 2021
12 Apr 2021
Historique:
received:
05
01
2021
accepted:
19
03
2021
entrez:
13
4
2021
pubmed:
14
4
2021
medline:
14
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is an evidence-based practice, but hospitals face significant barriers to its adoption. Our objective was to examine how organizational context (e.g., size, employee attitudes toward the clinical practice) and implementation strategies (i.e., the actions taken to routinize a clinical practice) drive successful implementation of immediate postpartum LARC services, with a goal of informing the design of future implementation interventions. We conducted a comparative case study of the implementation of inpatient postpartum contraceptive care at 11 US maternity hospitals. In 2017-2018, we conducted site visits that included semi-structured key informant interviews informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Qualitative measures of implementation success included stakeholder satisfaction, routinization, and sustainability of immediate postpartum LARC services. Qualitative content analysis and cross-case synthesis explored relationships among organizational context, implementation strategies, and implementation success. We completed semi-structured interviews with 78 clinicians, nurses, residents, pharmacy and revenue cycle staff, and hospital administrators. Successful implementation required three essential conditions: effective implementation champions, an enabling financial environment, and hospital administrator engagement. Six other contextual conditions were influential: trust and effective communication, alignment with stakeholders' professional values, perception of meeting patients' needs, robust learning climate, compatibility with workflow, and positive attitudes and adequate knowledge about the clinical practice. On average, sites used 18 (range 11-22) strategies. Strategies to optimize the financial environment and train clinicians and staff were commonly used. Strategies to plan and evaluate implementation and to engage patients emerged as promising to address barriers to practice change, yet were often underused. Implementation efforts in maternity settings may be more successful if they select strategies to optimize local conditions for success. Our findings elucidate key contextual conditions to target and provide a menu of promising implementation strategies for incorporating recommended contraceptive services into routine maternity practice. Additional prospective research should evaluate whether these strategies effectively optimize local conditions for successful implementation in a variety of settings.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is an evidence-based practice, but hospitals face significant barriers to its adoption. Our objective was to examine how organizational context (e.g., size, employee attitudes toward the clinical practice) and implementation strategies (i.e., the actions taken to routinize a clinical practice) drive successful implementation of immediate postpartum LARC services, with a goal of informing the design of future implementation interventions.
METHODS
METHODS
We conducted a comparative case study of the implementation of inpatient postpartum contraceptive care at 11 US maternity hospitals. In 2017-2018, we conducted site visits that included semi-structured key informant interviews informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Qualitative measures of implementation success included stakeholder satisfaction, routinization, and sustainability of immediate postpartum LARC services. Qualitative content analysis and cross-case synthesis explored relationships among organizational context, implementation strategies, and implementation success.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We completed semi-structured interviews with 78 clinicians, nurses, residents, pharmacy and revenue cycle staff, and hospital administrators. Successful implementation required three essential conditions: effective implementation champions, an enabling financial environment, and hospital administrator engagement. Six other contextual conditions were influential: trust and effective communication, alignment with stakeholders' professional values, perception of meeting patients' needs, robust learning climate, compatibility with workflow, and positive attitudes and adequate knowledge about the clinical practice. On average, sites used 18 (range 11-22) strategies. Strategies to optimize the financial environment and train clinicians and staff were commonly used. Strategies to plan and evaluate implementation and to engage patients emerged as promising to address barriers to practice change, yet were often underused.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Implementation efforts in maternity settings may be more successful if they select strategies to optimize local conditions for success. Our findings elucidate key contextual conditions to target and provide a menu of promising implementation strategies for incorporating recommended contraceptive services into routine maternity practice. Additional prospective research should evaluate whether these strategies effectively optimize local conditions for successful implementation in a variety of settings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33845922
doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00136-7
pii: 10.1186/s43058-021-00136-7
pmc: PMC8042857
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
42Subventions
Organisme : AHRQ HHS
ID : K08 HS025465
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : P30 DK092926
Pays : United States
Organisme : AHRQ HHS
ID : R01 HS023784
Pays : United States
Références
Healthc Q. 2009;12 Spec No Patient:123-8
pubmed: 19667789
Contraception. 2014 Nov;90(5):468-71
pubmed: 25107639
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Apr;20 Suppl 1:i18-23
pubmed: 21450764
Lancet. 2001 Aug 11;358(9280):483-8
pubmed: 11513933
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;90:19-27
pubmed: 28720510
Implement Sci. 2013 Dec 01;8:139
pubmed: 24289295
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;118(1):184-196
pubmed: 21691183
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;129(6):1078-1085
pubmed: 28486357
Implement Sci. 2014 Aug 12;9:102
pubmed: 25112492
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jan;283:112461
pubmed: 31257020
Qual Prim Care. 2011;19(1):49-57
pubmed: 21703112
Contraception. 2017 Apr;95(4):335-338
pubmed: 27913231
Front Public Health. 2019 Jun 18;7:158
pubmed: 31275915
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;222(4S):S906-S909
pubmed: 31866518
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Jan;29(1):64-76
pubmed: 31548278
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;222(4S):S910.e1-S910.e8
pubmed: 31838123
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;26(6):539-44
pubmed: 25379770
Implement Sci. 2019 Apr 29;14(1):42
pubmed: 31036028
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;218(6):590.e1-590.e7
pubmed: 29530670
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;222(4S):S911.e1-S911.e7
pubmed: 31978431
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Oct;27(10):771-780
pubmed: 29950324
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jun;127(6):e187-e192
pubmed: 27214194
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;128(2):e32-7
pubmed: 27454734
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Dec;18(6):434-40
pubmed: 19955453
Implement Sci. 2020 Aug 6;15(1):62
pubmed: 32762726
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;130(4):783-787
pubmed: 28885401
J Occup Environ Med. 2013 Apr;55(4):424-9
pubmed: 23302702
Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 07;4:50
pubmed: 19664226
J Am Board Fam Med. 2012 Sep-Oct;25(5):676-85
pubmed: 22956703
Womens Health Issues. 2016 May-Jun;26(3):313-20
pubmed: 26925700
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;222(4S):S878.e1-S878.e6
pubmed: 31809706
BMJ. 2008 Aug 07;337:a1035
pubmed: 18687726
Transl Behav Med. 2019 Nov 25;9(6):1057-1064
pubmed: 30535343
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Sep 27;15:E117
pubmed: 30264690
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;222(4S):S913-S914
pubmed: 31870731
Womens Health Issues. 2019 Nov - Dec;29(6):465-470
pubmed: 31495642
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Sep 2;:
pubmed: 32878968
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76
pubmed: 20957426
JAMA. 2019 Jul 2;322(1):76-78
pubmed: 31158852
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016 Jul 29;65(3):1-103
pubmed: 27467196
Implement Sci. 2013 May 10;8:51
pubmed: 23663819
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jan;129(1):3-9
pubmed: 27926643
Implement Sci. 2018 Jul 26;13(1):98
pubmed: 30045735
Implement Sci. 2015 Feb 12;10:21
pubmed: 25889199
Contraception. 2015 Dec;92(6):523-31
pubmed: 26452327
Implement Sci. 2017 Nov 21;12(1):138
pubmed: 29162140
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;222(4S):S893-S905
pubmed: 31794721
Med Care. 2020 May;58(5):e31-e38
pubmed: 32187105
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;130(2):393-402
pubmed: 28697112
Implement Sci. 2020 Jun 23;15(1):48
pubmed: 32576214