Recovery from chronic fatigue syndrome: a systematic review-heterogeneity of definition limits study comparison.


Journal

Archives of disease in childhood
ISSN: 1468-2044
Titre abrégé: Arch Dis Child
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372434

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2021
Historique:
received: 08 07 2020
revised: 11 01 2021
accepted: 12 02 2021
pubmed: 14 4 2021
medline: 19 11 2021
entrez: 13 4 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Paediatric chronic fatigue syndrome or myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) is a common illness with a major impact on quality of life. Recovery is poorly understood. Our aim was to describe definitions of recovery in paediatric CFS/ME, the rate of recovery and the time to recovery. This systematic review included a detailed search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo and Cochrane Library between 1994 and July 2018. Inclusion criteria were (1) clinical trials and observational studies, (2) participants aged <19 years with CFS/ME, (3) conducted in Western Healthcare systems and (4) studies including a measure of recovery and time taken to recover. Twelve papers (10 studies) were identified, involving 826 patients (range 23-135). Recovery rates were highly varied, ranging between 4.5% and 83%.Eleven distinct definitions of recovery were used; six were composite outcomes while five used unidimensional outcomes. Outcome measures used to define recovery were highly heterogeneous. School attendance (n=8), fatigue (n=6) and physical functioning (n=4) were the most common outcomes included in definition of recovery. Only five definitions included a personal measure of recovery. Definitions of recovery are highly variable, likely secondary to differences in study design, outcomes used, follow-up and study populations. Heterogeneous definitions of recovery limit meaningful comparison between studies, highlighting the need for a consensus definition going forward. Recovery is probably best defined from the child's own perspective with a single self-reported measure. If composite measures are used for research, there should be agreement on the core outcome set used.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Paediatric chronic fatigue syndrome or myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) is a common illness with a major impact on quality of life. Recovery is poorly understood. Our aim was to describe definitions of recovery in paediatric CFS/ME, the rate of recovery and the time to recovery.
METHODS
This systematic review included a detailed search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo and Cochrane Library between 1994 and July 2018. Inclusion criteria were (1) clinical trials and observational studies, (2) participants aged <19 years with CFS/ME, (3) conducted in Western Healthcare systems and (4) studies including a measure of recovery and time taken to recover.
RESULTS
Twelve papers (10 studies) were identified, involving 826 patients (range 23-135). Recovery rates were highly varied, ranging between 4.5% and 83%.Eleven distinct definitions of recovery were used; six were composite outcomes while five used unidimensional outcomes. Outcome measures used to define recovery were highly heterogeneous. School attendance (n=8), fatigue (n=6) and physical functioning (n=4) were the most common outcomes included in definition of recovery. Only five definitions included a personal measure of recovery.
IMPLICATIONS
Definitions of recovery are highly variable, likely secondary to differences in study design, outcomes used, follow-up and study populations. Heterogeneous definitions of recovery limit meaningful comparison between studies, highlighting the need for a consensus definition going forward. Recovery is probably best defined from the child's own perspective with a single self-reported measure. If composite measures are used for research, there should be agreement on the core outcome set used.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33846138
pii: archdischild-2020-320196
doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-320196
pmc: PMC8543221
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1087-1094

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
ID : SRF-2013-06-013
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: EMC is an unpaid medical advisor to The Sussex & Kent ME Society. EMC, one of the authors of this systematic review, was also an author of one of the included papers. However, to avoid a conflict of interest, EMC was not involved in the final study selection or data extraction.

Références

Pediatrics. 2013 Jun;131(6):e1788-95
pubmed: 23669515
Arch Dis Child. 2015 Dec;100(12):1141-7
pubmed: 26453575
Lancet. 2012 Apr 14;379(9824):1412-8
pubmed: 22385683
Psychol Med. 2010 Aug;40(8):1269-79
pubmed: 19891804
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2019 Nov 9;3(1):67
pubmed: 31707635
Lancet. 2011 Mar 5;377(9768):823-36
pubmed: 21334061
Arch Dis Child. 2010 Apr;95(4):245-9
pubmed: 19843509
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2018 Jul;23(3):398-408
pubmed: 29096528
Psychother Psychosom. 2007;76(3):171-6
pubmed: 17426416
QJM. 1997 Mar;90(3):223-33
pubmed: 9093600
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Dec;64(6):564-73
pubmed: 19120569
Behav Res Ther. 2012 Nov;50(11):719-25
pubmed: 22985998
BMJ Open. 2011 Dec 12;1(2):e000252
pubmed: 22155938
BMJ. 2005 Jan 1;330(7481):14
pubmed: 15585538
J Paediatr Child Health. 2002 Jun;38(3):295-9
pubmed: 12047700
Pediatrics. 2011 May;127(5):e1169-75
pubmed: 21502228
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2019 Dec 2;3(1):e000525
pubmed: 32500105
Arch Dis Child. 2004 Jul;89(7):615-9
pubmed: 15210489
Arch Dis Child. 2002 Feb;86(2):95-7
pubmed: 11827901
Ann Intern Med. 1994 Dec 15;121(12):953-9
pubmed: 7978722
J R Soc Med. 2000 Mar;93(3):129-34
pubmed: 10741312
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010 Sep;164(9):810-4
pubmed: 20819962
Arch Dis Child. 2005 Apr;90(4):367-8
pubmed: 15781924
Qual Life Res. 2014 Nov;23(9):2407-16
pubmed: 24791749
J R Soc Med. 1991 Feb;84(2):118-21
pubmed: 1999813
Pediatrics. 2009 Jul;124(1):189-93
pubmed: 19564299

Auteurs

Yasmin Moore (Y)

Centre for Academic Child Health, University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK.

Teona Serafimova (T)

Centre for Academic Child Health, University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK.

Nina Anderson (N)

Centre for Academic Child Health, University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK.
Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Ashton-under-Lyne, Lancashire, UK.

Hayley King (H)

Centre for Academic Child Health, University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK.

Alison Richards (A)

Centre for Academic Child Health, University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK.
Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West, National Institute for Health Research, Bristol, UK.

Amberly Brigden (A)

Centre for Academic Child Health, University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK.

Parisa Sinai (P)

Centre for Academic Child Health, University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK.

Julian Higgins (J)

Centre for Academic Child Health, University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK.

Caitlin Ascough (C)

Centre for Academic Child Health, University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK.

Philippa Clery (P)

Centre for Academic Child Health, University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK.

Esther M Crawley (EM)

Centre for Academic Child Health, University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol, UK esther.crawley@bristol.ac.uk.
Royal United Hospital Bath NHS Trust, Bath, Bath and North East Somerset, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH