Short-term real-world outcomes following intravitreal brolucizumab for neovascular AMD: SHIFT study.


Journal

The British journal of ophthalmology
ISSN: 1468-2079
Titre abrégé: Br J Ophthalmol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0421041

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2022
Historique:
received: 14 01 2021
revised: 02 03 2021
accepted: 25 03 2021
pubmed: 14 4 2021
medline: 24 8 2022
entrez: 13 4 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Brolucizumab has recently been approved in Europe as a novel treatment for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). We report on early experiences with real-world outcomes of switch to brolucizumab therapy in previously anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF)-treated patients. Patients with recalcitrant nAMD were switched to brolucizumab therapy. Functional and structural parameters 4 weeks after first brolucizumab injection were evaluated including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA (logMAR)), foveal centre point (FCP (µm)), central subfield retinal thickness (CSRT (µm)) and macular volume (mm³). Sixty-three eyes of 57 patients with nAMD (52.6% females) with a mean (±SD) age of 79.5±6.7 years were included. Mean change of BCVA was 0.03±0.14 logMAR (p=0.115). Significant reductions were recorded for FCP with a mean (±SD) change of -66.81±72.63 µm, -66.76±60.71 µm for CSRT and -0.27±0.24 mm³ for macular volume (all p<0.001). Intraocular inflammation was observed in seven eyes of seven patients, including one case of retinal vasculitis. The results of the SHIFT study indicate that switch to brolucizumab may represent a treatment option in patients with nAMD poorly responsive to other anti-VEGF agents. Further long-term analyses appear prudent to assess efficacy and safety of brolucizumab in a routine clinical setting.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Brolucizumab has recently been approved in Europe as a novel treatment for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). We report on early experiences with real-world outcomes of switch to brolucizumab therapy in previously anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF)-treated patients.
METHODS
Patients with recalcitrant nAMD were switched to brolucizumab therapy. Functional and structural parameters 4 weeks after first brolucizumab injection were evaluated including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA (logMAR)), foveal centre point (FCP (µm)), central subfield retinal thickness (CSRT (µm)) and macular volume (mm³).
RESULTS
Sixty-three eyes of 57 patients with nAMD (52.6% females) with a mean (±SD) age of 79.5±6.7 years were included. Mean change of BCVA was 0.03±0.14 logMAR (p=0.115). Significant reductions were recorded for FCP with a mean (±SD) change of -66.81±72.63 µm, -66.76±60.71 µm for CSRT and -0.27±0.24 mm³ for macular volume (all p<0.001). Intraocular inflammation was observed in seven eyes of seven patients, including one case of retinal vasculitis.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of the SHIFT study indicate that switch to brolucizumab may represent a treatment option in patients with nAMD poorly responsive to other anti-VEGF agents. Further long-term analyses appear prudent to assess efficacy and safety of brolucizumab in a routine clinical setting.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33846161
pii: bjophthalmol-2020-318672
doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318672
pmc: PMC9411904
doi:

Substances chimiques

Angiogenesis Inhibitors 0
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized 0
Recombinant Fusion Proteins 0
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A 0
Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor EC 2.7.10.1
brolucizumab XSZ53G39H5

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1288-1294

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: Non-financial support from Heidelberg Engineering to ST, LB, RL, MS and FGH; from CenterVue to ST and FGH; from Optos to ST, LB, RL, MS and FGH; from Carl Zeiss Meditec to ST, LB, RF, FGH and MS. Grant and personal fees from Allergan, Novartis, Bayer and Heidelberg Engineering to ST and FGH; from Apellis, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Acucela, Genentech/Roche, Boehringer-Ingelheim, LIN Bioscience, Pixium, Kanghong, Oxurion, Grayburg Vision, Stealth BioTherapeutics, Geuder and Iveric Bio to FGH. JN: None declared.

Références

N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 5;355(14):1419-31
pubmed: 17021318
Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2003 Jun;16(2):155-70, v
pubmed: 12809155
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2010 Nov;30(6):816-23
pubmed: 21205268
J Vitreoretin Dis. 2020 Jul;4(4):269-279
pubmed: 32789284
Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr;104(4):493-499
pubmed: 31383649
Ophthalmology. 2016 May;123(5):1080-9
pubmed: 26906165
Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jan;96(1):14-20
pubmed: 21791509
Ophthalmology. 2021 Jan;128(1):89-99
pubmed: 32574761
Surv Ophthalmol. 2018 Sep - Oct;63(5):638-645
pubmed: 29476754
Am J Ophthalmol. 2003 Feb;135(2):194-205
pubmed: 12566024
Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep;98(9):1144-67
pubmed: 25136079
Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Jul;156(1):23-28.e2
pubmed: 23664153
Acta Ophthalmol. 2011 Mar;89(2):e206-7
pubmed: 19900197
Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2020 Mar 31;18:100680
pubmed: 32258827
Ophthalmologe. 2021 Mar;118(3):248-256
pubmed: 33555415
Eye (Lond). 2021 May;35(5):1292-1294
pubmed: 33082532
Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Feb;153(2):209-213.e2
pubmed: 22264944
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2016 Jun 02;10:1857-67
pubmed: 27330279
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2015 Sep;38(7):620-7
pubmed: 25913443
Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jan;96(1):21-3
pubmed: 21733918
Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2020 Apr 02;18:100687
pubmed: 32280811
Lancet. 2012 May 5;379(9827):1728-38
pubmed: 22559899
Int Med Case Rep J. 2020 May 11;13:145-152
pubmed: 32494207
Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec 20;12:13-20
pubmed: 29339917
Br J Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb;99(2):220-6
pubmed: 25193672
Ophthalmology. 2017 Sep;124(9):1296-1304
pubmed: 28551167
Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Feb;2(2):e106-16
pubmed: 25104651
Drugs Aging. 2015 Oct;32(10):797-807
pubmed: 26442858
Ophthalmology. 2021 Jul;128(7):1050-1059
pubmed: 33207259
Ophthalmology. 2020 Oct;127(10):1345-1359
pubmed: 32344075
Eye (Lond). 2021 Apr;35(4):1045-1047
pubmed: 32709960

Auteurs

Louisa Maria Bulirsch (LM)

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Marlene Saßmannshausen (M)

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Jennifer Nadal (J)

Institute for Medical Biometry, Informatics and Epidemiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Raffael Liegl (R)

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Sarah Thiele (S)

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Frank G Holz (FG)

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany Frank.Holz@ukbonn.de.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH