Short-term real-world outcomes following intravitreal brolucizumab for neovascular AMD: SHIFT study.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
Female
Humans
Intravitreal Injections
Male
Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
/ therapeutic use
Recombinant Fusion Proteins
Retina
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
Visual Acuity
Wet Macular Degeneration
/ diagnosis
Brolucizumab
drugs
imaging
macula
neovascularisation
Journal
The British journal of ophthalmology
ISSN: 1468-2079
Titre abrégé: Br J Ophthalmol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0421041
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2022
09 2022
Historique:
received:
14
01
2021
revised:
02
03
2021
accepted:
25
03
2021
pubmed:
14
4
2021
medline:
24
8
2022
entrez:
13
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Brolucizumab has recently been approved in Europe as a novel treatment for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). We report on early experiences with real-world outcomes of switch to brolucizumab therapy in previously anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF)-treated patients. Patients with recalcitrant nAMD were switched to brolucizumab therapy. Functional and structural parameters 4 weeks after first brolucizumab injection were evaluated including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA (logMAR)), foveal centre point (FCP (µm)), central subfield retinal thickness (CSRT (µm)) and macular volume (mm³). Sixty-three eyes of 57 patients with nAMD (52.6% females) with a mean (±SD) age of 79.5±6.7 years were included. Mean change of BCVA was 0.03±0.14 logMAR (p=0.115). Significant reductions were recorded for FCP with a mean (±SD) change of -66.81±72.63 µm, -66.76±60.71 µm for CSRT and -0.27±0.24 mm³ for macular volume (all p<0.001). Intraocular inflammation was observed in seven eyes of seven patients, including one case of retinal vasculitis. The results of the SHIFT study indicate that switch to brolucizumab may represent a treatment option in patients with nAMD poorly responsive to other anti-VEGF agents. Further long-term analyses appear prudent to assess efficacy and safety of brolucizumab in a routine clinical setting.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Brolucizumab has recently been approved in Europe as a novel treatment for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). We report on early experiences with real-world outcomes of switch to brolucizumab therapy in previously anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF)-treated patients.
METHODS
Patients with recalcitrant nAMD were switched to brolucizumab therapy. Functional and structural parameters 4 weeks after first brolucizumab injection were evaluated including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA (logMAR)), foveal centre point (FCP (µm)), central subfield retinal thickness (CSRT (µm)) and macular volume (mm³).
RESULTS
Sixty-three eyes of 57 patients with nAMD (52.6% females) with a mean (±SD) age of 79.5±6.7 years were included. Mean change of BCVA was 0.03±0.14 logMAR (p=0.115). Significant reductions were recorded for FCP with a mean (±SD) change of -66.81±72.63 µm, -66.76±60.71 µm for CSRT and -0.27±0.24 mm³ for macular volume (all p<0.001). Intraocular inflammation was observed in seven eyes of seven patients, including one case of retinal vasculitis.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of the SHIFT study indicate that switch to brolucizumab may represent a treatment option in patients with nAMD poorly responsive to other anti-VEGF agents. Further long-term analyses appear prudent to assess efficacy and safety of brolucizumab in a routine clinical setting.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33846161
pii: bjophthalmol-2020-318672
doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318672
pmc: PMC9411904
doi:
Substances chimiques
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
0
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
Recombinant Fusion Proteins
0
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
0
Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
EC 2.7.10.1
brolucizumab
XSZ53G39H5
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1288-1294Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: Non-financial support from Heidelberg Engineering to ST, LB, RL, MS and FGH; from CenterVue to ST and FGH; from Optos to ST, LB, RL, MS and FGH; from Carl Zeiss Meditec to ST, LB, RF, FGH and MS. Grant and personal fees from Allergan, Novartis, Bayer and Heidelberg Engineering to ST and FGH; from Apellis, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Acucela, Genentech/Roche, Boehringer-Ingelheim, LIN Bioscience, Pixium, Kanghong, Oxurion, Grayburg Vision, Stealth BioTherapeutics, Geuder and Iveric Bio to FGH. JN: None declared.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 5;355(14):1419-31
pubmed: 17021318
Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2003 Jun;16(2):155-70, v
pubmed: 12809155
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2010 Nov;30(6):816-23
pubmed: 21205268
J Vitreoretin Dis. 2020 Jul;4(4):269-279
pubmed: 32789284
Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr;104(4):493-499
pubmed: 31383649
Ophthalmology. 2016 May;123(5):1080-9
pubmed: 26906165
Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jan;96(1):14-20
pubmed: 21791509
Ophthalmology. 2021 Jan;128(1):89-99
pubmed: 32574761
Surv Ophthalmol. 2018 Sep - Oct;63(5):638-645
pubmed: 29476754
Am J Ophthalmol. 2003 Feb;135(2):194-205
pubmed: 12566024
Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep;98(9):1144-67
pubmed: 25136079
Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Jul;156(1):23-28.e2
pubmed: 23664153
Acta Ophthalmol. 2011 Mar;89(2):e206-7
pubmed: 19900197
Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2020 Mar 31;18:100680
pubmed: 32258827
Ophthalmologe. 2021 Mar;118(3):248-256
pubmed: 33555415
Eye (Lond). 2021 May;35(5):1292-1294
pubmed: 33082532
Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Feb;153(2):209-213.e2
pubmed: 22264944
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2016 Jun 02;10:1857-67
pubmed: 27330279
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2015 Sep;38(7):620-7
pubmed: 25913443
Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jan;96(1):21-3
pubmed: 21733918
Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2020 Apr 02;18:100687
pubmed: 32280811
Lancet. 2012 May 5;379(9827):1728-38
pubmed: 22559899
Int Med Case Rep J. 2020 May 11;13:145-152
pubmed: 32494207
Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec 20;12:13-20
pubmed: 29339917
Br J Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb;99(2):220-6
pubmed: 25193672
Ophthalmology. 2017 Sep;124(9):1296-1304
pubmed: 28551167
Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Feb;2(2):e106-16
pubmed: 25104651
Drugs Aging. 2015 Oct;32(10):797-807
pubmed: 26442858
Ophthalmology. 2021 Jul;128(7):1050-1059
pubmed: 33207259
Ophthalmology. 2020 Oct;127(10):1345-1359
pubmed: 32344075
Eye (Lond). 2021 Apr;35(4):1045-1047
pubmed: 32709960