Hemostasis, coagulation and thrombin in venoarterial and venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: the HECTIC study.
Adult
Anticoagulants
/ pharmacology
Arteries
/ physiology
Automation
Blood Coagulation
/ drug effects
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
/ adverse effects
Factor Xa
/ metabolism
Female
Hemorrhage
/ etiology
Hemostasis
/ drug effects
Heparin
/ pharmacology
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Partial Thromboplastin Time
Thrombelastography
Thrombin
/ metabolism
Veins
/ physiology
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 04 2021
12 04 2021
Historique:
received:
17
01
2021
accepted:
23
03
2021
entrez:
13
4
2021
pubmed:
14
4
2021
medline:
3
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support has a high incidence of both bleeding and thrombotic complications. Despite clear differences in patient characteristics and pathologies between veno-venous (VV) and veno-arterial (VA) ECMO support, anticoagulation practices are often the same across modalities. Moreover, there is very little data on their respective coagulation profiles and comparisons of thrombin generation in these patients. This study compares the coagulation profile and thrombin generation between patients supported with either VV and VA ECMO. A prospective cohort study of patients undergoing VA and VV ECMO at an Intensive care department of a university hospital and ECMO referral centre. In addition to routine coagulation testing and heparin monitoring per unit protocol, thromboelastography (TEG), multiplate aggregometry (MEA), calibrated automated thrombinography (CAT) and von-Willebrand's activity (antigen and activity ratio) were sampled second-daily for 1 week, then weekly thereafter. VA patients had significantly lower platelets counts, fibrinogen, anti-thrombin and clot strength with higher d-dimer levels than VV patients, consistent with a more pronounced consumptive coagulopathy. Thrombin generation was higher in VA than VV patients, and the heparin dose required to suppress thrombin generation was lower in VA patients. There were no significant differences in total bleeding or thrombotic event rates between VV and VA patients when adjusted for days on extracorporeal support. VA patients received a lower median daily heparin dose 8500 IU [IQR 2500-24000] versus VV 28,800 IU [IQR 17,300-40,800.00]; < 0.001. Twenty-eight patients (72%) survived to hospital discharge; comprising 53% of VA patients and 77% of VV patients. Significant differences between the coagulation profiles of VA and VV patients exist, and anticoagulation strategies for patients of these modalities should be different. Further research into the development of tailored anticoagulation strategies that include the mode of ECMO support need to be completed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33846433
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87026-z
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-87026-z
pmc: PMC8042030
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anticoagulants
0
Heparin
9005-49-6
Thrombin
EC 3.4.21.5
Factor Xa
EC 3.4.21.6
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
7975Références
BMJ. 2010 Nov 02;341:c5317
pubmed: 21045023
Anesth Analg. 2019 Sep;129(3):659-666
pubmed: 31425204
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015 Apr;29(2):288-96
pubmed: 25655210
J Pediatr. 1996 Aug;129(2):264-8
pubmed: 8765625
J Thromb Haemost. 2016 Nov;14(11):2253-2260
pubmed: 27601054
Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Dec 12;5:352
pubmed: 30619862
Perfusion. 2016 Nov;31(8):625-633
pubmed: 27125829
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2019 Aug 08;6:114
pubmed: 31440518
Crit Care Med. 2016 Apr;44(4):747-54
pubmed: 26646464
ASAIO J. 2014 Jul-Aug;60(4):419-23
pubmed: 24727537
Crit Care Med. 2000 Jul;28(7):2584-90
pubmed: 10921599
Crit Care Med. 2019 Jul;47(7):e563-e571
pubmed: 31033512
ASAIO J. 1999 Jul-Aug;45(4):250-63
pubmed: 10445729
J Crit Care. 2019 Dec;54:239-243
pubmed: 31630073
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014 Jun;15(5):e198-205
pubmed: 24614609
Respiration. 2017;93(3):212-225
pubmed: 27997925
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Aug;11(8):3325-3335
pubmed: 31559035
Front Med (Lausanne). 2017 Sep 29;4:156
pubmed: 29034235
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016 Jun;30(3):692-701
pubmed: 27321792
Anesth Analg. 2015 Apr;120(4):730-6
pubmed: 25565317
Intensive Care Med. 2012 Jan;38(1):62-8
pubmed: 21965100
Crit Care. 2013 Apr 18;17(2):R73
pubmed: 23594433
Ann Intensive Care. 2016 Dec;6(1):97
pubmed: 27714705
Minerva Anestesiol. 2016 Feb;82(2):170-9
pubmed: 25990432
ASAIO J. 2019 Mar/Apr;65(3):257-263
pubmed: 29746315
Front Pediatr. 2016 Jan 06;3:116
pubmed: 26779465
Minerva Anestesiol. 2016 Nov 18;83(3):255 - 265
pubmed: 27858410
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2017 Sep;28(6):475-478
pubmed: 28230634
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Jul 5;46(1):21-8
pubmed: 15992630
Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2000 Apr;22(4):401-4
pubmed: 10745020
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018 Aug;37(8):985-991
pubmed: 29650295
Crit Care. 2017 Jul 29;21(1):191
pubmed: 28754139
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 May 18;9(10):e016521
pubmed: 32375010
Ann Intensive Care. 2018 Jan 16;8(1):7
pubmed: 29340875
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2013 Apr 16;21:29
pubmed: 23587157
Circulation. 2011 Jun 14;123(23):2736-47
pubmed: 21670242
Intensive Care Med. 2016 May;42(5):844-852
pubmed: 27007099
Perfusion. 2015 Nov;30(8):675-82
pubmed: 25823366
Trials. 2019 Jun 11;20(1):349
pubmed: 31186035
Perfusion. 2011 Jul;26(4):284-8
pubmed: 21558298
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Feb;63(1):21-7
pubmed: 25083831