Assessment of feasibility and acceptability of family-centered care implemented at a neonatal intensive care unit in India.

Family participatory care, child rights, newborn-parent unity India Neonatal health Neonatal intensive care unit Newborn care, family-centered care Special newborn care unit

Journal

BMC pediatrics
ISSN: 1471-2431
Titre abrégé: BMC Pediatr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967804

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 04 2021
Historique:
received: 06 12 2020
accepted: 02 04 2021
entrez: 14 4 2021
pubmed: 15 4 2021
medline: 28 5 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

A family-centered care (FCC) parent participation program that ensures an infant is not separated from parents against their will was developed for the caring of their small or sick newborn at a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in Delhi, India. Healthcare provider sensitization training directed at psychosocial and tangible support and an audio-visual training tool for parent-attendants were developed that included: 1) handwashing, infection prevention, protocol for entry; 2) developmentally supportive care, breastfeeding, expression of breastmilk and assisted feeding; 3) kangaroo mother care; and 4) preparation for discharge and care at home. The study aimed to examine the feasibility and acceptability of the FCC model in a NICU in India. A prospective cohort design collected quantitative data on each parent-attendant/infant dyad at enrollment, during the NICU stay, and at discharge. Feasibility of the FCC program was measured by assessing the participation of parent-attendants and healthcare providers, and whether training components were implemented as intended. Acceptability was measured by the proportion of parent-attendants who participated in the trainings and their ability to accurately complete program activities. Of 395 NICU admissions during the study period, eligible participants included 333 parent-attendant/infant dyads, 24 doctors, and 21 nurses. Of the 1242 planned parent-attendant training sessions, 939 (75.6%) were held, indicating that program fidelity was high, and the majority of trainings were implemented as intended. While 50% of parent-attendants completed all 4 FCC training sessions, 95% completed sessions 1 and 2; 60% of the total participating parent-attendants completed session 3, and 75% completed session 4. Compliance rates were over 96% for 5 of 10 FCC parent-attendant activities, and 60 to 78% for the remaining 5 activities. FCC was feasible to implement in this setting and was acceptable to participating parent-attendants and healthcare providers. Parents participated in trainings conducted by NICU providers and engaged in essential care to their infants in the NICU. A standard care approach and behavior norms for healthcare providers directed psychosocial and tangible support to parent-attendants so that a child is not separated from his or her parents against their will while receiving advanced care in the NICU.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
A family-centered care (FCC) parent participation program that ensures an infant is not separated from parents against their will was developed for the caring of their small or sick newborn at a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in Delhi, India. Healthcare provider sensitization training directed at psychosocial and tangible support and an audio-visual training tool for parent-attendants were developed that included: 1) handwashing, infection prevention, protocol for entry; 2) developmentally supportive care, breastfeeding, expression of breastmilk and assisted feeding; 3) kangaroo mother care; and 4) preparation for discharge and care at home. The study aimed to examine the feasibility and acceptability of the FCC model in a NICU in India.
METHODS
A prospective cohort design collected quantitative data on each parent-attendant/infant dyad at enrollment, during the NICU stay, and at discharge. Feasibility of the FCC program was measured by assessing the participation of parent-attendants and healthcare providers, and whether training components were implemented as intended. Acceptability was measured by the proportion of parent-attendants who participated in the trainings and their ability to accurately complete program activities.
RESULTS
Of 395 NICU admissions during the study period, eligible participants included 333 parent-attendant/infant dyads, 24 doctors, and 21 nurses. Of the 1242 planned parent-attendant training sessions, 939 (75.6%) were held, indicating that program fidelity was high, and the majority of trainings were implemented as intended. While 50% of parent-attendants completed all 4 FCC training sessions, 95% completed sessions 1 and 2; 60% of the total participating parent-attendants completed session 3, and 75% completed session 4. Compliance rates were over 96% for 5 of 10 FCC parent-attendant activities, and 60 to 78% for the remaining 5 activities.
CONCLUSIONS
FCC was feasible to implement in this setting and was acceptable to participating parent-attendants and healthcare providers. Parents participated in trainings conducted by NICU providers and engaged in essential care to their infants in the NICU. A standard care approach and behavior norms for healthcare providers directed psychosocial and tangible support to parent-attendants so that a child is not separated from his or her parents against their will while receiving advanced care in the NICU.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33849477
doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-02644-w
pii: 10.1186/s12887-021-02644-w
pmc: PMC8042842
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

171

Subventions

Organisme : U.S.A.I.D.(US)
ID : AID-OAA-A-14-00049

Références

Acta Paediatr. 2012 Oct;101(10):1032-7
pubmed: 22812674
Lancet. 2005 Mar 5-11;365(9462):891-900
pubmed: 15752534
Indian J Community Med. 2016 Jan-Mar;41(1):11-5
pubmed: 26917867
Am J Crit Care. 2018 Jan;27(1):52-58
pubmed: 29292276
Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2014 Oct;2(4):268-78
pubmed: 25349870
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13 Suppl 1:S12
pubmed: 23445639
Nurs Womens Health. 2016 Apr-May;20(2):158-66
pubmed: 27067932
Iran J Pediatr. 2016 Jul 26;26(5):e3960
pubmed: 28203324
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Mar 21;19(1):184
pubmed: 30898170
Ital J Pediatr. 2017 Apr 17;43(1):36
pubmed: 28412958
Adv Neonatal Care. 2018 Jun;18(3):208-214
pubmed: 29596071
Acta Paediatr. 1999 Apr;88(4):353-5
pubmed: 10342526
J Perinatol. 2017 Dec;37(12):1259-1264
pubmed: 28796241
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Jan;9(1):SC04-8
pubmed: 25738051
Pediatr Res. 2020 Sep;88(3):421-428
pubmed: 32380505
Scand J Caring Sci. 2018 Sep;32(3):1012-1017
pubmed: 29131378
Semin Perinatol. 2011 Feb;35(1):20-8
pubmed: 21255703
Indian Pediatr. 2017 Jun 15;54(6):455-459
pubmed: 28667715
J Health Popul Nutr. 2011 Oct;29(5):500-9
pubmed: 22106756
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2017 Jul/Sep;31(3):274-280
pubmed: 28737547
Pediatrics. 2010 Feb;125(2):e278-85
pubmed: 20100748
J Perinatol. 2007 Dec;27 Suppl 2:S32-7
pubmed: 18034178
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Feb 23;10 Suppl 1:S1
pubmed: 20233382
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2016 Aug 8;24:e2753
pubmed: 27508921
Lancet. 2005 Mar 12-18;365(9463):977-88
pubmed: 15767001
BMC Pediatr. 2020 Nov 28;20(1):535
pubmed: 33246430
J UOEH. 2017;39(3):235-240
pubmed: 28904275
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2017 Jan/Mar;31(1):75-85
pubmed: 28121762
Early Hum Dev. 2014 Sep;90 Suppl 2:S45-6
pubmed: 25220127
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Jun;25(6):601-12
pubmed: 20467909
CMAJ. 2014 Aug 5;186(11):845-7
pubmed: 24710910
J Pediatr. 2021 Jan;228:36-43.e2
pubmed: 32898578
Early Hum Dev. 2014 Dec;90(12):863-7
pubmed: 25463833
Pediatrics. 2003 Sep;112(3 Pt 1):691-7
pubmed: 12949306

Auteurs

Arti Maria (A)

Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital (RML) Hospital, New Delhi, India.

James A Litch (JA)

Global Alliance to Prevent Prematurity and Stillbirth (GAPPS), 19009 33rd Avenue W, Suite 200, Lynnwood, WA, 98036, USA. jim.litch@gapps.org.

Maria Stepanchak (M)

Global Alliance to Prevent Prematurity and Stillbirth (GAPPS), 19009 33rd Avenue W, Suite 200, Lynnwood, WA, 98036, USA.

Enisha Sarin (E)

Vridhi Project, New Delhi, India.

Rashmi Wadhwa (R)

Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital (RML) Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Harish Kumar (H)

Vridhi Project, New Delhi, India.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH