Successful SARS-CoV-2 vaccine allergy risk-management: The experience of a large Italian University Hospital.
Allergy
Anaphylaxis
COVID-19
Polyethylen glycole
Vaccine
Journal
The World Allergy Organization journal
ISSN: 1939-4551
Titre abrégé: World Allergy Organ J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101481283
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2021
May 2021
Historique:
received:
23
02
2021
revised:
29
03
2021
accepted:
01
04
2021
pubmed:
15
4
2021
medline:
15
4
2021
entrez:
14
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Novel Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines have been approved recently, and public concern regarding the risk of anaphylactic reactions arose after a few cases during the first days of mass vaccination. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) has been suggested as the most probable culprit agent for allergic reactions. We describe the allergy work-up protocol implemented for the vaccination campaign in our Center, aiming to allow the greatest number of people to be vaccinated safely. The protocol included the self-report of a history of suspected drug or vaccine allergies, and subsequent teleconsultation and allergometric tests for PEG and Polysorbate 80 (PS80). A desensitizing protocol of vaccine administration was applied to patients sensitized only to PS80, and to those with a suspect allergic reaction after the first vaccine dose. 10.2% (414 out of 4042) of the entire vaccine population have been screened: only one patient resulted allergic to PEG and therefore excluded from the vaccination. Another patient was sensitized to PS80 only and safely vaccinated applying the desensitizing protocol. Seven subjects without a previous history of allergic disease experienced suspect hypersensitivity reactions to the first administered dose: one of them resulted allergic to PEG and was excluded from the second dose, while the others safely completed the vaccination with the desensitizing protocol. A careful allergological risk-assessment protocol significantly reduces the number of patients who would have avoided SARS-CoV-2 vaccination for their allergies and to effectively identify and manage those rare patients with sensitization to PEGs and/or PS80.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Novel Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines have been approved recently, and public concern regarding the risk of anaphylactic reactions arose after a few cases during the first days of mass vaccination. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) has been suggested as the most probable culprit agent for allergic reactions.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
We describe the allergy work-up protocol implemented for the vaccination campaign in our Center, aiming to allow the greatest number of people to be vaccinated safely.
METHODS
METHODS
The protocol included the self-report of a history of suspected drug or vaccine allergies, and subsequent teleconsultation and allergometric tests for PEG and Polysorbate 80 (PS80). A desensitizing protocol of vaccine administration was applied to patients sensitized only to PS80, and to those with a suspect allergic reaction after the first vaccine dose.
RESULTS
RESULTS
10.2% (414 out of 4042) of the entire vaccine population have been screened: only one patient resulted allergic to PEG and therefore excluded from the vaccination. Another patient was sensitized to PS80 only and safely vaccinated applying the desensitizing protocol. Seven subjects without a previous history of allergic disease experienced suspect hypersensitivity reactions to the first administered dose: one of them resulted allergic to PEG and was excluded from the second dose, while the others safely completed the vaccination with the desensitizing protocol.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
A careful allergological risk-assessment protocol significantly reduces the number of patients who would have avoided SARS-CoV-2 vaccination for their allergies and to effectively identify and manage those rare patients with sensitization to PEGs and/or PS80.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33850601
doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2021.100541
pii: S1939-4551(21)00035-1
pmc: PMC8030995
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100541Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Author(s).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
-Giovanni Paoletti does not have any conflict of interest to report.-Francesca Racca does not have any conflict of interest to report.-Alessandra Piona does not have any conflict of interest to report.-Giulio Melone does not have any conflict of interest to report.-Morena Merigo does not have any conflict of interest to report.-Francesca Puggioni reports personal fees from Astrazeneca, Chiesi, GSK, Guidotti, Menarini, Mundipharma, Novartis, Sanofi, Valeas, Allergy therapeutics, Almirall outside the submitted work.-Sebastian Ferri does not have any conflict of interest to report.-Elena Azzolini does not have any conflict of interest to report.-Michele Lagioia does not have any conflict of interest to report.-Donatella Lamacchia does not have any conflict of interest to report.-Giuseppe Cataldo does not have any conflict of interest to report.-Maurizio Cecconi does not have any conflict of interest to report.-Enrico Heffler reports participation to advisory boards and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Sanofi, GSK, Novartis, Circassia, Nestlè Purina, Boheringer Ingheleim, Valeas, Stallergenes Greer outside the submitted work.-Giorgio Walter Canonica reports grants as well as lecture or advisory board fees from: A. Menarini, Alk-Abello, Allergy Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chiesi Farmaceutici, Genentech, Guidotti-Malesci, Glaxo Smith Kline, Hal Allergy, Mylan, Merck, Mundipharma, Novartis, Regeneron, Sanofi-Aventis, Sanofi-Genzyme, StallergenesGreer, UCB pharma, Uriach Pharma, Valeas, ViborPharma.
Références
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2017 Nov;28(7):628-640
pubmed: 28779496
BMJ Case Rep. 2012 May 08;2012:
pubmed: 22605841
World Allergy Organ J. 2021 Feb;14(2):100517
pubmed: 33558825
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Mar;147(3):877-878
pubmed: 33485650
A A Case Rep. 2015 Mar 1;4(5):61-4
pubmed: 25730412
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2015;25(5):368-9
pubmed: 26727768
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2018 Apr;17(4):261-279
pubmed: 29326426
Lancet. 2021 Dec 19;396(10267):1979-1993
pubmed: 33220855
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2014 May-Jun;2(3):353-4
pubmed: 24811032
Ann Allergy. 1992 Oct;69(4):336-8
pubmed: 1416269
Allergy. 2021 Jun;76(6):1624-1628
pubmed: 33378789
Vaccine. 2021 Feb 5;39(6):865-867
pubmed: 33441235
Clin Transl Allergy. 2020 Jun 18;10:23
pubmed: 32566128
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018 Feb;141(2):463-472
pubmed: 29413255
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 Mar;137(3):868-78
pubmed: 26452420
Allergy. 2021 Jun;76(6):1617-1618
pubmed: 33320974
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Feb 12;70(6):217-222
pubmed: 33571174
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Jan 29;70(4):125-129
pubmed: 33507892
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Feb;9(2):670-675
pubmed: 33011299
Contact Dermatitis. 2013 Sep;69(3):183-5
pubmed: 23948038
Allergy. 2021 Jun;76(6):1922-1924
pubmed: 33340417
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2011 Dec;107(6):542-3
pubmed: 22123387
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 4;384(5):403-416
pubmed: 33378609
Science. 2020 Dec 18;370(6523):1392-1394
pubmed: 33335045
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Jul;130(1):25-43
pubmed: 22608573
Vaccine. 2007 Aug 1;25(31):5675-84
pubmed: 17448577
JAMA. 2021 Feb 23;325(8):780-781
pubmed: 33475702
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Apr;9(4):1423-1437
pubmed: 33388478
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 31;383(27):2603-2615
pubmed: 33301246
N Engl J Med. 2021 May 13;384(19):1824-1835
pubmed: 33440088
Clin Exp Allergy. 2016 Jul;46(7):907-22
pubmed: 27196817