Diagnosis of Uncomplicated and Complicated Appendicitis in Adults.


Journal

Scandinavian journal of surgery : SJS : official organ for the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society
ISSN: 1799-7267
Titre abrégé: Scand J Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101144297

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 15 4 2021
medline: 15 12 2021
entrez: 14 4 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Diagnostic work-up of acute appendicitis remains challenging. While some guidelines advise to use a risk stratification based on clinical parameters, others use standard imaging in all patients. As non-operative management of uncomplicated appendicitis has been identified as feasible and safe, differentiation between uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis is of paramount importance. We reviewed the literature to describe the optimal strategy for diagnosis of acute appendicitis. A narrative review about the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in adult patients was conducted. Both diagnostic strategies and goals were analyzed. For diagnosing acute appendicitis, both ruling in and ruling out the disease are important. Clinical and laboratory findings individually do not suffice, but when combined in a diagnostic score, a better risk prediction can be made for having acute appendicitis. However, for accurate diagnosis imaging seems obligatory in patients suspected for acute appendicitis. Scoring systems combining clinical and imaging features may differentiate between uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis and may enable ruling out complicated appendicitis. Within conservatively treated patients with uncomplicated appendicitis, predictive factors for non-responsiveness to antibiotics and recurrence of appendicitis need to be defined in order to optimize treatment outcomes. Standard imaging increases the diagnostic power for both ruling in and ruling out acute appendicitis. Incorporating imaging features in clinical scoring models may provide better differentiation between uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. Optimizing patient selection for antibiotic treatment of appendicitis may minimize recurrence rates, resulting in better treatment outcomes.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Diagnostic work-up of acute appendicitis remains challenging. While some guidelines advise to use a risk stratification based on clinical parameters, others use standard imaging in all patients. As non-operative management of uncomplicated appendicitis has been identified as feasible and safe, differentiation between uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis is of paramount importance. We reviewed the literature to describe the optimal strategy for diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
METHODS METHODS
A narrative review about the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in adult patients was conducted. Both diagnostic strategies and goals were analyzed.
RESULTS RESULTS
For diagnosing acute appendicitis, both ruling in and ruling out the disease are important. Clinical and laboratory findings individually do not suffice, but when combined in a diagnostic score, a better risk prediction can be made for having acute appendicitis. However, for accurate diagnosis imaging seems obligatory in patients suspected for acute appendicitis. Scoring systems combining clinical and imaging features may differentiate between uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis and may enable ruling out complicated appendicitis. Within conservatively treated patients with uncomplicated appendicitis, predictive factors for non-responsiveness to antibiotics and recurrence of appendicitis need to be defined in order to optimize treatment outcomes.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Standard imaging increases the diagnostic power for both ruling in and ruling out acute appendicitis. Incorporating imaging features in clinical scoring models may provide better differentiation between uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. Optimizing patient selection for antibiotic treatment of appendicitis may minimize recurrence rates, resulting in better treatment outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33851877
doi: 10.1177/14574969211008330
pmc: PMC8258714
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anti-Bacterial Agents 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

170-179

Références

Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2017 Jan;23(1):29-33
pubmed: 28261767
Br J Surg. 2015 Apr;102(5):563-72
pubmed: 25727811
Br J Surg. 2014 Jan;101(1):e147-55
pubmed: 24272981
N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 12;383(20):1907-1919
pubmed: 33017106
World J Surg. 2017 Jul;41(7):1769-1781
pubmed: 28258458
Lancet. 2011 May 7;377(9777):1573-9
pubmed: 21550483
N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 26;366(17):1596-605
pubmed: 22533576
Int J Epidemiol. 2003 Apr;32(2):304-13
pubmed: 12714554
J Surg Res. 2012 Jul;176(1):79-83
pubmed: 22113128
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Jun;84(6):946-950
pubmed: 29521805
Int J Surg. 2016 Jul;31:71-9
pubmed: 27262882
Br J Surg. 2016 May;103(6):656-667
pubmed: 26990957
World J Surg. 2015 Jan;39(1):112
pubmed: 25315090
Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Nov;132(5):910-25
pubmed: 2239906
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Apr 15;15(1):27
pubmed: 32295644
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Mar;206(3):508-17
pubmed: 26901006
World J Surg. 2007 Jan;31(1):86-92
pubmed: 17180556
Br J Surg. 2004 Jan;91(1):28-37
pubmed: 14716790
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 19;2019(11):
pubmed: 31743429
Scand J Surg. 2017 Sep;106(3):196-201
pubmed: 28737110
Br J Surg. 2017 Dec;104(13):1785-1790
pubmed: 28925502
J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Feb;14(2):309-14
pubmed: 19936849
Arch Surg. 2011 Mar;146(3):308-14
pubmed: 21422362
Radiology. 2013 Jul;268(1):135-43
pubmed: 23481162
World J Surg. 2008 Aug;32(8):1843-9
pubmed: 18553045
Radiology. 2018 Apr;287(1):104-115
pubmed: 29173071
Radiology. 2000 May;215(2):349-52
pubmed: 10796906
Am Surg. 2019 Apr 1;85(4):397-402
pubmed: 31043201
BMC Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun 26;14:114
pubmed: 24970111
Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):4668-4690
pubmed: 27660247
J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 Nov;15(11S):S373-S387
pubmed: 30392606
Lancet. 2015 Sep 26;386(10000):1278-1287
pubmed: 26460662
Radiology. 2012 Aug;264(2):455-63
pubmed: 22700556
Br J Surg. 2015 Jul;102(8):979-90
pubmed: 25963411
Br J Surg. 2018 Jul;105(8):933-945
pubmed: 29902346
Br J Surg. 2020 Jan;107(1):73-86
pubmed: 31797357
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Sep;22(9):1015-24
pubmed: 26291309
Radiology. 2008 Oct;249(1):97-106
pubmed: 18682583
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jun;98(23):e15768
pubmed: 31169674
World J Surg. 2012 Jul;36(7):1540-5
pubmed: 22447205
World J Surg. 2017 Mar;41(3):693-700
pubmed: 27864617
Eur Radiol. 2018 Sep;28(9):3601-3610
pubmed: 29541911
Ann Surg. 2020 Feb;271(2):332-338
pubmed: 30048324
Eur Radiol. 2015 May;25(5):1464-70
pubmed: 25591748
J Int Med Res. 2015 Jun;43(3):341-9
pubmed: 25762518
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2018 Nov;24(6):557-562
pubmed: 30516256
BJS Open. 2021 Mar 5;5(2):
pubmed: 33688952
JAMA. 2015 Jun 16;313(23):2340-8
pubmed: 26080338
Br J Surg. 2016 Sep;103(10):1343-9
pubmed: 27465409
Colorectal Dis. 2016 Dec;18(12):1129-1132
pubmed: 27454191

Auteurs

W J Bom (WJ)

Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

J C G Scheijmans (JCG)

Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

P Salminen (P)

Department of Surgery, University of Turku, Division of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.

M A Boermeester (MA)

Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH