SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance System in Canada: Longitudinal Trend Analysis.
Alberta
British Columbia
COVID 7-day lag
COVID transmission deceleration
COVID transmission jerk
COVID-19
COVID-21
Canada Public Health Surveillance
Canada SARS-CoV-2
Canadian COVID transmission acceleration
Canadian COVID transmission speed
Canadian COVID-19
Canadian COVID-19 surveillance system
Canadian econometrics
Great COVID Shutdown
Manitoba
New Brunswick
Newfoundland and Labrador
Northwest Territories
Nova Scotia
Nunavut
Ontario
Prince Edward Island
Quebec
Saskatchewan
Yukon
dynamic panel data
generalized method of the moments
global COVID surveillance
new COVID strains
surveillance metrics
wave 2 Canada COVID-19
Journal
JMIR public health and surveillance
ISSN: 2369-2960
Titre abrégé: JMIR Public Health Surveill
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101669345
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 05 2021
10 05 2021
Historique:
received:
13
11
2020
accepted:
09
04
2021
revised:
25
02
2021
pubmed:
15
4
2021
medline:
15
5
2021
entrez:
14
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The COVID-19 global pandemic has disrupted structures and communities across the globe. Numerous regions of the world have had varying responses in their attempts to contain the spread of the virus. Factors such as public health policies, governance, and sociopolitical climate have led to differential levels of success at controlling the spread of SARS-CoV-2. Ultimately, a more advanced surveillance metric for COVID-19 transmission is necessary to help government systems and national leaders understand which responses have been effective and gauge where outbreaks occur. The goal of this study is to provide advanced COVID-19 surveillance metrics for Canada at the country, province, and territory level that account for shifts in the pandemic including speed, acceleration, jerk, and persistence. Enhanced surveillance identifies risks for explosive growth and regions that have controlled outbreaks successfully. Using a longitudinal trend analysis study design, we extracted 62 days of COVID-19 data from Canadian public health registries for 13 provinces and territories. We used an empirical difference equation to measure the daily number of cases in Canada as a function of the prior number of cases, the level of testing, and weekly shift variables based on a dynamic panel model that was estimated using the generalized method of moments approach by implementing the Arellano-Bond estimator in R. We compare the week of February 7-13, 2021, with the week of February 14-20, 2021. Canada, as a whole, had a decrease in speed from 8.4 daily new cases per 100,000 population to 7.5 daily new cases per 100,000 population. The persistence of new cases during the week of February 14-20 reported 7.5 cases that are a result of COVID-19 transmissions 7 days earlier. The two most populous provinces of Ontario and Quebec both experienced decreases in speed from 7.9 and 11.5 daily new cases per 100,000 population for the week of February 7-13 to speeds of 6.9 and 9.3 for the week of February 14-20, respectively. Nunavut experienced a significant increase in speed during this time, from 3.3 daily new cases per 100,000 population to 10.9 daily new cases per 100,000 population. Canada excelled at COVID-19 control early on in the pandemic, especially during the first COVID-19 shutdown. The second wave at the end of 2020 resulted in a resurgence of the outbreak, which has since been controlled. Enhanced surveillance identifies outbreaks and where there is the potential for explosive growth, which informs proactive health policy.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The COVID-19 global pandemic has disrupted structures and communities across the globe. Numerous regions of the world have had varying responses in their attempts to contain the spread of the virus. Factors such as public health policies, governance, and sociopolitical climate have led to differential levels of success at controlling the spread of SARS-CoV-2. Ultimately, a more advanced surveillance metric for COVID-19 transmission is necessary to help government systems and national leaders understand which responses have been effective and gauge where outbreaks occur.
OBJECTIVE
The goal of this study is to provide advanced COVID-19 surveillance metrics for Canada at the country, province, and territory level that account for shifts in the pandemic including speed, acceleration, jerk, and persistence. Enhanced surveillance identifies risks for explosive growth and regions that have controlled outbreaks successfully.
METHODS
Using a longitudinal trend analysis study design, we extracted 62 days of COVID-19 data from Canadian public health registries for 13 provinces and territories. We used an empirical difference equation to measure the daily number of cases in Canada as a function of the prior number of cases, the level of testing, and weekly shift variables based on a dynamic panel model that was estimated using the generalized method of moments approach by implementing the Arellano-Bond estimator in R.
RESULTS
We compare the week of February 7-13, 2021, with the week of February 14-20, 2021. Canada, as a whole, had a decrease in speed from 8.4 daily new cases per 100,000 population to 7.5 daily new cases per 100,000 population. The persistence of new cases during the week of February 14-20 reported 7.5 cases that are a result of COVID-19 transmissions 7 days earlier. The two most populous provinces of Ontario and Quebec both experienced decreases in speed from 7.9 and 11.5 daily new cases per 100,000 population for the week of February 7-13 to speeds of 6.9 and 9.3 for the week of February 14-20, respectively. Nunavut experienced a significant increase in speed during this time, from 3.3 daily new cases per 100,000 population to 10.9 daily new cases per 100,000 population.
CONCLUSIONS
Canada excelled at COVID-19 control early on in the pandemic, especially during the first COVID-19 shutdown. The second wave at the end of 2020 resulted in a resurgence of the outbreak, which has since been controlled. Enhanced surveillance identifies outbreaks and where there is the potential for explosive growth, which informs proactive health policy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33852410
pii: v7i5e25753
doi: 10.2196/25753
pmc: PMC8112542
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e25753Informations de copyright
©Lori Post, Michael J Boctor, Tariq Z Issa, Charles B Moss, Robert Leo Murphy, Chad J Achenbach, Michael G Ison, Danielle Resnick, Lauren Singh, Janine White, Sarah B Welch, James F Oehmke. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (https://publichealth.jmir.org), 10.05.2021.
Références
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 May;4(5):460-471
pubmed: 32355299
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 5;22(10):e21955
pubmed: 32924962
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Jul 17;6(3):e19969
pubmed: 32501806
BMJ. 2020 Jun 9;369:m2294
pubmed: 32518177
Int J Surg. 2020 Jun;78:185-193
pubmed: 32305533
Int J Surg. 2020 Apr;76:71-76
pubmed: 32112977
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):89
pubmed: 33413219
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 15;23(1):e25830
pubmed: 33302252
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 3;22(12):e24286
pubmed: 33216726
Soc Work Health Care. 2021 Jan 6;:1-16
pubmed: 33407057
Lancet. 2020 Mar 21;395(10228):936-937
pubmed: 32199479
Epidemiol Rev. 1988;10:164-90
pubmed: 3066626
CMAJ. 2013 Mar 5;185(4):287-8
pubmed: 23382256
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Aug;39(8):1419-1425
pubmed: 32543923
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 22;22(9):e20924
pubmed: 32915762