Role of caregiver factors in outpatient medical follow-up post-stroke: observational study in Singapore.
Caregivers
Family caregivers
Healthcare utilization
Primary care
Stroke
Journal
BMC family practice
ISSN: 1471-2296
Titre abrégé: BMC Fam Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967792
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 04 2021
14 04 2021
Historique:
received:
24
10
2020
accepted:
22
02
2021
entrez:
15
4
2021
pubmed:
16
4
2021
medline:
25
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Outpatient medical follow-up post-stroke is not only crucial for secondary prevention but is also associated with a reduced risk of rehospitalization. However, being voluntary and non-urgent, it is potentially determined by both healthcare needs and the socio-demographic context of stroke survivor-caregiver dyads. Therefore, we aimed to examine the role of caregiver factors in outpatient medical follow-up (primary care (PC) and specialist outpatient care (SOC)) post-stroke. Stroke survivors and caregivers from the Singapore Stroke Study, a prospective, yearlong, observational study, contributed to the study sample. Participants were interviewed 3-monthly for data collection. Counts of PC and SOC visits were extracted from the National Claims Database. Poisson modelling was used to explore the association of caregiver (and patient) factors with PC/SOC visits over 0-3 months (early) and 4-12 months (late) post-stroke. For the current analysis, 256 stroke survivors and caregivers were included. While caregiver-reported memory problems of a stroke survivor (IRR: 0.954; 95% CI: 0.919, 0.990) and caregiver burden (IRR: 0.976; 95% CI: 0.959, 0.993) were significantly associated with lower early post-stroke PC visits, co-residing caregiver (IRR: 1.576; 95% CI: 1.040, 2.389) and negative care management strategies (IRR: 1.033; 95% CI: 1.005, 1.061) were significantly associated with higher late post-stroke SOC visits. We demonstrated that the association of caregiver factors with outpatient medical follow-up varied by the type of service (i.e., PC versus SOC) and temporally. Our results support family-centred care provision by family physicians viewing caregivers not only as facilitators of care in the community but also as active members of the care team and as clients requiring care and regular assessments.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Outpatient medical follow-up post-stroke is not only crucial for secondary prevention but is also associated with a reduced risk of rehospitalization. However, being voluntary and non-urgent, it is potentially determined by both healthcare needs and the socio-demographic context of stroke survivor-caregiver dyads. Therefore, we aimed to examine the role of caregiver factors in outpatient medical follow-up (primary care (PC) and specialist outpatient care (SOC)) post-stroke.
METHOD
Stroke survivors and caregivers from the Singapore Stroke Study, a prospective, yearlong, observational study, contributed to the study sample. Participants were interviewed 3-monthly for data collection. Counts of PC and SOC visits were extracted from the National Claims Database. Poisson modelling was used to explore the association of caregiver (and patient) factors with PC/SOC visits over 0-3 months (early) and 4-12 months (late) post-stroke.
RESULTS
For the current analysis, 256 stroke survivors and caregivers were included. While caregiver-reported memory problems of a stroke survivor (IRR: 0.954; 95% CI: 0.919, 0.990) and caregiver burden (IRR: 0.976; 95% CI: 0.959, 0.993) were significantly associated with lower early post-stroke PC visits, co-residing caregiver (IRR: 1.576; 95% CI: 1.040, 2.389) and negative care management strategies (IRR: 1.033; 95% CI: 1.005, 1.061) were significantly associated with higher late post-stroke SOC visits.
CONCLUSION
We demonstrated that the association of caregiver factors with outpatient medical follow-up varied by the type of service (i.e., PC versus SOC) and temporally. Our results support family-centred care provision by family physicians viewing caregivers not only as facilitators of care in the community but also as active members of the care team and as clients requiring care and regular assessments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33853544
doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01405-z
pii: 10.1186/s12875-021-01405-z
pmc: PMC8048235
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
74Références
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Oct;8(6 Suppl 3):S190-2
pubmed: 26515208
J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Feb;15(2):75-83
pubmed: 10672109
Health Syst Reform. 2019;5(1):18-23
pubmed: 30924743
JAMA. 2013 Aug 14;310(6):575-6
pubmed: 23867885
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015 Oct;24(10):2256-62
pubmed: 26277294
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011 Nov-Dec;18(6):786-97
pubmed: 22436315
Med Care. 2006 Aug;44(8):713-21
pubmed: 16862032
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 21;13(2):e0192533
pubmed: 29466383
J Gen Psychol. 1998 Apr;125(2):175-91
pubmed: 9935342
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007 Feb;15(2):130-9
pubmed: 17272733
J Aging Health. 1994 May;6(2):255-69
pubmed: 10133304
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012 Apr;27(4):382-93
pubmed: 21560160
Can J Neurol Sci. 2012 Nov;39(6):793-800
pubmed: 23041400
Asia Pac Fam Med. 2014 Jul 19;13(1):8
pubmed: 25120380
Gerontologist. 2017 Oct 1;57(5):880-889
pubmed: 27816914
Dementia (London). 2018 Jan;17(1):34-60
pubmed: 26764265
Lancet Neurol. 2007 Feb;6(2):182-7
pubmed: 17239805
Stroke. 2004 Apr;35(4):918-23
pubmed: 14976324
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2009 Oct-Dec;23(4):306-14
pubmed: 19568149
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53928
pubmed: 23326541
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2008 Nov;37(11):929-35
pubmed: 19082199
Fam Pract. 2002 Aug;19(4):378-82
pubmed: 12110559
NeuroRehabilitation. 2010;27(1):95-104
pubmed: 20634604
BMC Neurol. 2019 Nov 4;19(1):267
pubmed: 31684922
Gerontologist. 2008 Aug;48(4):495-504
pubmed: 18728299
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Mar;70(3):305-14
pubmed: 18155388
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83
pubmed: 3558716
Stroke. 2007 Jun;38(6):1893-8
pubmed: 17446431
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 25;18(1):817
pubmed: 30359277
BMJ Open. 2020 Apr 23;10(4):e036631
pubmed: 32332008
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Mar 27;19(1):192
pubmed: 30917828
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Nov 22;18(1):881
pubmed: 30466417
Lancet Neurol. 2006 Jul;5(7):603-12
pubmed: 16781990
Aging Ment Health. 2013;17(8):935-41
pubmed: 23410096
Neurology. 2020 Mar 24;94(12):e1249-e1258
pubmed: 32079738
Res Nurs Health. 2004 Apr;27(2):121-34
pubmed: 15042638
Int J Stroke. 2016 Oct;11(8):928-934
pubmed: 27435204
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2013 Dec;42(12):646-56
pubmed: 24463826
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Jun;38(6):957-963
pubmed: 31158009
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2015 Dec;27(6):883-91
pubmed: 25835219