Lifelong learning and nurses' continuing professional development, a metasynthesis of the literature.


Journal

BMC nursing
ISSN: 1472-6955
Titre abrégé: BMC Nurs
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088683

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Apr 2021
Historique:
received: 03 11 2020
accepted: 31 03 2021
entrez: 15 4 2021
pubmed: 16 4 2021
medline: 16 4 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Continuing professional development (CPD) is central to nurses' lifelong learning and constitutes a vital aspect for keeping nurses' knowledge and skills up-to-date. While we know about the need for nurses' continuing professional development, less is known about how nurses experience and perceive continuing professional development. A metasynthesis of how nurses experience and view continuing professional development may provide a basis for planning future continuing professional development interventions more effectively and take advantage of examples from different contexts. The aim of this paper is to conduct such a metasynthesis, investigating the qualitative research on nurses' experiences of continuing professional development. A metasynthesis of the qualitative literature was conducted. A total of 25 articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were reviewed. We determined five overarching themes, Organisational culture shapes the conditions, Supportive environment as a prerequisite, Attitudes and motivation reflect nurse's professional values, Nurses' perceptions of barriers and Perceived impact on practice as a core value. This metasynthesis highlights that nurses value continuing professional development and believe that it is fundamental to professionalism and lifelong learning. Moreover CPD is identified as important in improving patient care standards. Based on the metasynthesis, we argue that access to continuing professional development could be made more attainable, realistic and relevant. Expediently, organizations should adequately fund and make continuing professional development accessible. In turn, nurses should continue to actively engage in continuing professional development to maintain high standards of nursing care through competent practice. This paper highlights the perceived benefits and challenges of continuing professional development that nurses face and offers advice and understanding in relation to continuing professional development. We believe that this metasynthesis contributes with insights and suggestions that would be valuable for nurses and policy makers and others who are involved in nurse education and continuing professional development.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Continuing professional development (CPD) is central to nurses' lifelong learning and constitutes a vital aspect for keeping nurses' knowledge and skills up-to-date. While we know about the need for nurses' continuing professional development, less is known about how nurses experience and perceive continuing professional development. A metasynthesis of how nurses experience and view continuing professional development may provide a basis for planning future continuing professional development interventions more effectively and take advantage of examples from different contexts. The aim of this paper is to conduct such a metasynthesis, investigating the qualitative research on nurses' experiences of continuing professional development.
METHODS METHODS
A metasynthesis of the qualitative literature was conducted. A total of 25 articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were reviewed.
RESULTS RESULTS
We determined five overarching themes, Organisational culture shapes the conditions, Supportive environment as a prerequisite, Attitudes and motivation reflect nurse's professional values, Nurses' perceptions of barriers and Perceived impact on practice as a core value. This metasynthesis highlights that nurses value continuing professional development and believe that it is fundamental to professionalism and lifelong learning. Moreover CPD is identified as important in improving patient care standards.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Based on the metasynthesis, we argue that access to continuing professional development could be made more attainable, realistic and relevant. Expediently, organizations should adequately fund and make continuing professional development accessible. In turn, nurses should continue to actively engage in continuing professional development to maintain high standards of nursing care through competent practice. This paper highlights the perceived benefits and challenges of continuing professional development that nurses face and offers advice and understanding in relation to continuing professional development. We believe that this metasynthesis contributes with insights and suggestions that would be valuable for nurses and policy makers and others who are involved in nurse education and continuing professional development.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33853599
doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00579-2
pii: 10.1186/s12912-021-00579-2
pmc: PMC8045269
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

62

Références

JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2010 Jul-Sep;49(179):209-15
pubmed: 22049825
Nurse Educ Today. 2006 Aug;26(6):475-83
pubmed: 16481072
Nurse Educ Today. 2014 May;34(5):860-5
pubmed: 24219922
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Feb;61:83-88
pubmed: 29195211
Nurse Res. 2008;15(2):59-71
pubmed: 18283763
Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Apr;34(4):655-60
pubmed: 23891123
BMC Nurs. 2013 Mar 27;12:9
pubmed: 23537293
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Mar;38:22-8
pubmed: 26833276
Nurse Educ Today. 2007 Jan;27(1):26-34
pubmed: 16616397
Br J Nurs. 2016 Nov 10;25(20):1117-1122
pubmed: 27834515
Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 May;52(5):939-50
pubmed: 25766265
Nurse Educ Today. 2010 Feb;30(2):142-9
pubmed: 19646799
Nurse Educ Today. 2015 Feb;35(2):388-94
pubmed: 25467716
Nurse Educ Today. 2011 May;31(4):390-5
pubmed: 21129826
Nurse Educ Today. 2007 Jul;27(5):466-73
pubmed: 17109998
Qual Health Res. 2000 May;10(3):340-53
pubmed: 10947480
Br J Nurs. 2015 Apr 23-May 13;24(8):454-7
pubmed: 25904452
Nurse Educ Today. 2003 Oct;23(7):498-508
pubmed: 12963359
Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 Jan;50(1):34-43
pubmed: 22944285
J Adv Nurs. 2010 Feb;66(2):246-54
pubmed: 20423407
Nurs Manag (Harrow). 2016 Feb;22(9):30-6
pubmed: 26938913
J Contin Educ Nurs. 2012 Sep;43(9):420-7
pubmed: 22715876
Nurse Educ Today. 2011 Jul;31(5):482-7
pubmed: 20952105
Nurs Times. 2010 Apr 20-26;106(15):10-3
pubmed: 20481228
Scand J Caring Sci. 2013 Dec;27(4):1027-34
pubmed: 23167699
Nurs Sci Q. 2010 Jul;23(3):226-30
pubmed: 20558652
AANA J. 2017 Oct;85(5):345-351
pubmed: 31566534
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Jul;28(13-14):2565-2576
pubmed: 30807678
J Adv Nurs. 2006 Feb;53(3):311-8
pubmed: 16441536
Front Psychiatry. 2017 Dec 01;8:269
pubmed: 29249996
Collegian. 2011;18(3):131-6
pubmed: 21957666
Br J Nurs. 2016 Aug 11;25(15):860-4
pubmed: 27523759
Neonatal Netw. 2010 Mar-Apr 1;29(2):117-22
pubmed: 20211834
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2002;34(3):213-9
pubmed: 12237982
Nurse Educ Pract. 2017 Jan;22:55-62
pubmed: 27940391
J Clin Nurs. 2011 Dec;20(23-24):3561-6
pubmed: 21722221
Nurse Educ Pract. 2015 Nov;15(6):572-8
pubmed: 26559351
J Contin Educ Nurs. 2016 Dec 1;47(12):566-572
pubmed: 27893920
Nurs Times. 2009 Jan 20-26;105(2):24-7
pubmed: 19260265
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2015 Oct;22(8):616-22
pubmed: 26010165
Contemp Nurse. 2013 Aug;45(1):33-45
pubmed: 24099224
Br J Nurs. 2000 May 11-24;9(9):549-52
pubmed: 11904889
J Adv Nurs. 2005 Apr;50(2):204-11
pubmed: 15788085

Auteurs

Mandlenkosi Mlambo (M)

Jersey General Hospital, St Helier, Jersey.
Department of LIME, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Charlotte Silén (C)

Department of LIME, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Cormac McGrath (C)

Department of LIME, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. cormac.mcgrath@edu.su.se.
Department of Education, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden. cormac.mcgrath@edu.su.se.

Classifications MeSH