Efficacy of the iDBT-Pain skills training intervention to reduce emotional dysregulation and pain intensity in people with chronic pain: protocol for a single-case experimental design with multiple baselines.
mental health
neurological pain
pain management
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 04 2021
14 04 2021
Historique:
entrez:
15
4
2021
pubmed:
16
4
2021
medline:
20
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Difficulties in emotional regulation are key to the development and maintenance of chronic pain. Recent evidence shows internet-delivered dialectic behaviour therapy (iDBT) skills training can reduce emotional dysregulation and pain intensity. However, further studies are needed to provide more definitive evidence regarding the efficacy of iDBT skills training in the chronic pain population. A single-case experimental design (SCED) with multiple baselines will be used to examine the efficacy of a 4-week iDBT-Pain skills training intervention (iDBT-Pain intervention) to reduce emotional dysregulation and pain intensity in individuals with chronic pain. The iDBT-Pain intervention encompasses two components: (1) iDBT-Pain skills training sessions (iDBT-Pain sessions) and (2) the iDBT-Pain skills training web application (iDBT-Pain app). Three individuals with chronic pain will be recruited and randomly allocated to different baseline phases (5, 9 or 12 days). Following the baseline phase, participants will receive six 60-90 min iDBT-Pain sessions approximately 4 or 5 days apart, delivered by a psychologist via Zoom. To reinforce learnings from the iDBT-Pain sessions, participants will have unlimited use of the iDBT-Pain app. A 7-day follow-up phase (maintenance) will follow the intervention, whereby the iDBT-Pain sessions cease but the iDBT-Pain app is accessible. Emotional regulation, as the primary outcome measure, will be assessed using the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Pain intensity, as the secondary outcome measure, will be assessed using a visual analogue scale. Generalisation measures will assess psychological state factors (depression, anxiety and coping behaviour), alongside sleep quality, well-being and harm avoidance. SCEDs are increasingly considered effective designs for internet-delivered psychological interventions because SCED enables the investigation of interindividual variability in a heterogeneous population such as chronic pain. This trial was approved by the University of New South Wales (HC200199). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals. ACTRN12620000604909.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33853792
pii: bmjopen-2020-041745
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041745
pmc: PMC8054083
doi:
Banques de données
ANZCTR
['ACTRN12620000604909']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e041745Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: CW receives consulting fees from Mindstrong Health and Lyra Health. JSu reports other from Microsoft, outside the submitted work.
Références
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2020 May 7;16:187-212
pubmed: 31821023
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S240-52
pubmed: 22588748
Healthcare (Basel). 2019 Nov 13;7(4):
pubmed: 31766188
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2014;24(3-4):445-63
pubmed: 23883189
J Affect Disord. 2018 May;232:219-228
pubmed: 29499504
Behav Res Ther. 2014 Aug;59:40-51
pubmed: 24974307
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Feb 17;106(7):2423-8
pubmed: 19171885
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 Sep 27;16:100455
pubmed: 31650075
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2013;23(5):619-38
pubmed: 24050810
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961 Jun;4:561-71
pubmed: 13688369
Br J Clin Psychol. 2009 Mar;48(Pt 1):1-20
pubmed: 18724887
Scand J Pain. 2017 Oct;17:58-67
pubmed: 28850375
BMJ. 1999 Sep 11;319(7211):703-4
pubmed: 10480833
Brain Behav Immun. 2016 Aug;56:397-411
pubmed: 27118632
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2003 Jan-Feb;11(1):33-45
pubmed: 12527538
Addict Behav. 2018 Dec;87:200-205
pubmed: 30053706
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 May;61(3):164-179
pubmed: 29253607
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:CD007407
pubmed: 23152245
Clin J Pain. 2005 Jan-Feb;21(1):56-68; discussion 69-72
pubmed: 15599132
Front Neurol. 2019 Dec 03;10:1110
pubmed: 31849800
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2009 Apr;31(3):339-52
pubmed: 18618359
Behav Modif. 2011 Jul;35(4):303-22
pubmed: 21411481
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Feb 08;15(2):e22
pubmed: 23399668
Eur J Pain. 2019 Feb;23(2):203-219
pubmed: 30101509
Psychol Bull. 2007 Jul;133(4):581-624
pubmed: 17592957
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 1;74(4):351-359
pubmed: 28241179
Behav Modif. 2006 Sep;30(5):598-617
pubmed: 16894232
J Behav Med. 2007 Feb;30(1):77-94
pubmed: 17180640
Psychol Methods. 2010 Jun;15(2):124-44
pubmed: 20515235
Behav Ther. 2011 Jun;42(2):284-99
pubmed: 21496513
J Clin Psychol. 2010 Jun;66(6):563-82
pubmed: 20455249
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012 Nov;21(4):397-414
pubmed: 23071200
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2012 May;27(3):248-61
pubmed: 22382384
J Psychosom Res. 2018 Apr;107:38-45
pubmed: 29502762
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993 Dec;50(12):975-90
pubmed: 8250684
Scand J Pain. 2017 Dec 29;1(1):50-54
pubmed: 29913921
Spinal Cord. 2014 Apr;52(4):282-6
pubmed: 24469147
Med Care. 1988 Jul;26(7):724-35
pubmed: 3393032
Am Psychol. 2014 Feb-Mar;69(2):153-66
pubmed: 24547801
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008 Feb;50(2):99-103
pubmed: 18201299
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Sep 30;219(1):204-13
pubmed: 24863866
Pain. 2020 May;161(5):889-893
pubmed: 32251203
Anesth Analg. 2007 Jul;105(1):205-21
pubmed: 17578977
J Clin Psychol. 2011 Sep;67(9):942-68
pubmed: 21647882