Changes in quality of life (QoL) and other patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in living-donor and deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients and those awaiting transplantation in the UK ATTOM programme: a longitudinal cohort questionnaire survey with additional qualitative interviews.
chronic renal failure
dialysis
nephrology
patient-reported outcome measures
quality of life
renal transplantation
transplant medicine
transplant surgery
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 04 2021
14 04 2021
Historique:
entrez:
15
4
2021
pubmed:
16
4
2021
medline:
21
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To examine quality of life (QoL) and other patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in kidney transplant recipients and those awaiting transplantation. Longitudinal cohort questionnaire surveys and qualitative semi-structured interviews using thematic analysis with a pragmatic approach. Completion of generic and disease-specific PROMs at two time points, and telephone interviews with participants UK-wide. 101 incident deceased-donor (DD) and 94 incident living-donor (LD) kidney transplant recipients, together with 165 patients on the waiting list (WL) from 18 UK centres recruited to the Access to Transplantation and Transplant Outcome Measures (ATTOM) programme completed PROMs at recruitment (November 2011 to March 2013) and 1 year follow-up. Forty-one of the 165 patients on the WL received a DD transplant and 26 received a LD transplant during the study period, completing PROMs initially as patients on the WL, and again 1 year post-transplant. A subsample of 10 LD and 10 DD recipients participated in qualitative semi-structured interviews. LD recipients were younger, had more educational qualifications and more often received a transplant before dialysis. Controlling for these and other factors, cross-sectional analyses at 12 months post-transplant suggested better QoL, renal-dependent QoL and treatment satisfaction for LD than DD recipients. Patients on the WL reported worse outcomes compared with both transplant groups. However, longitudinal analyses (controlling for pre-transplant differences) showed that LD and DD recipients reported similarly improved health status and renal-dependent QoL (p<0.01) pre-transplant to post-transplant. Patients on the WL had worsened health status but no change in QoL. Qualitative analyses revealed transplant recipients' expectations influenced their recovery and satisfaction with transplant. While cross-sectional analyses suggested LD kidney transplantation leads to better QoL and treatment satisfaction, longitudinal assessment showed similar QoL improvements in PROMs for both transplant groups, with better outcomes than for those still wait-listed. Regardless of transplant type, clinicians need to be aware that managing expectations is important for facilitating patients' adjustment post-transplant.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33853805
pii: bmjopen-2020-047263
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047263
pmc: PMC8098938
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e047263Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: All authors completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf. Professor Watson reports personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline outside the submitted work. Professor Clare Bradley reports grants from NIHR during the conduct of the study, and grants from NIHR and GlaxoSmithKline/ViiV Healthcare, outside the submitted work. CB is the majority shareholder in a company, Health Psychology Research Ltd, which licenses her patient-reported outcome measures, for others to use. These questionnaires include the RDQoL, RTSQ and W-BQ used in the ATTOM programme. CB owns the copyright in all of these instruments and when they are licensed for use by commercial companies in their clinical trials, receives royalties. All other authors declared no competing interests. The results presented in this paper have not been published previously in whole or part, except in abstract format.
Références
Clin Kidney J. 2016 Jun;9(3):503-9
pubmed: 27274840
Transplant Proc. 2012 Jan;44(1):287-9
pubmed: 22310635
Nephron. 2017;137 Suppl 1:45-72
pubmed: 28930722
Transplant Proc. 2016 Jun;48(5):1498-505
pubmed: 27496435
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Jun;23(6):508-18
pubmed: 24505110
Transplant Direct. 2018 Mar 01;4(4):e351
pubmed: 29707622
Diabetes Care. 2018 Feb;41(2):267-276
pubmed: 29183910
BMJ Open. 2016 Feb 25;6(2):e010377
pubmed: 26916695
Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24(7):673-82
pubmed: 16802843
Clin Transplant. 2002 Dec;16(6):455-60
pubmed: 12437627
Br J Health Psychol. 2014 Sep;19(3):580-91
pubmed: 23826640
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002 Dec;17(12):2204-11
pubmed: 12454234
BMJ. 2013 Jan 28;346:f167
pubmed: 23358487
Psychol Med. 1991 Aug;21(3):749-59
pubmed: 1946863
Adv Perit Dial. 1997;13:116-20
pubmed: 9360663
Clin Exp Nephrol. 2010 Aug;14(4):340-8
pubmed: 20567874
Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36
pubmed: 21479777
J Transplant. 2011;2011:671571
pubmed: 21822474
BMJ. 2010 Jul 20;341:c3451
pubmed: 20647283
Int J Angiol. 2016 Mar;25(1):29-38
pubmed: 26900309
Transplant Proc. 2015 May;47(4):958-62
pubmed: 26036494
BMJ. 2017 Feb 20;356:j816
pubmed: 28219884
Health Econ. 2018 Jan;27(1):23-38
pubmed: 28833854
Nephrourol Mon. 2014 Jul 05;6(4):e12182
pubmed: 25695017
Transplantation. 2020 Jun;104(6):1246-1255
pubmed: 31449188
Am J Kidney Dis. 2005 Mar;45(3):572-9
pubmed: 15754280
Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83
pubmed: 1593914
Qual Life Res. 2000;9(8):915-30
pubmed: 11284211
BMJ. 2003 Nov 29;327(7426):1261
pubmed: 14644969
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Jul 03;4:40
pubmed: 16817960
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017 May 01;32(5):890-900
pubmed: 28379431
Med Clin (Barc). 2017 Aug 10;149(3):114-118
pubmed: 28427723
Kidney Int. 2000 Aug;58(2):491-9
pubmed: 10916072
J Adv Nurs. 1997 Mar;25(3):562-70
pubmed: 9080284
Qual Life Res. 1999;8(1-2):79-91
pubmed: 10457741
Lancet. 2001 Jan 6;357(9249):7-8
pubmed: 11197385
J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Aug;12(8):478-84
pubmed: 9276653
Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51
pubmed: 24979285