Long-term storage of feces at -80 °C versus -20 °C is negligible for 16S rRNA amplicon profiling of the equine bacterial microbiome.

16S Amplicon DNA metabarcoding Equine Equus ferus caballus Horse Long-term storage Microbiome Protocol Sequencing

Journal

PeerJ
ISSN: 2167-8359
Titre abrégé: PeerJ
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101603425

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 04 11 2020
accepted: 04 01 2021
entrez: 15 4 2021
pubmed: 16 4 2021
medline: 16 4 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The development of next-generation sequencing technologies has spurred a surge of research on bacterial microbiome diversity and function. But despite the rapid growth of the field, many uncertainties remain regarding the impact of differing methodologies on downstream results. Sample storage temperature is conventionally thought to be among the most important factors for ensuring reproducibility across marker gene studies, but to date much of the research on this topic has focused on short-term storage in the context of clinical applications. Consequently, it has remained unclear if storage at -80 °C, widely viewed as the gold standard for long-term archival of feces, is truly required for maintaining sample integrity in amplicon-based studies. A better understanding of the impacts of long-term storage conditions is important given the substantial cost and limited availability of ultra-low temperature freezers. To this end, we compared bacterial microbiome profiles inferred from 16S V3-V4 amplicon sequencing for paired fecal samples obtained from a feral horse population from Sable Island, Nova Scotia, Canada, stored at either -80 °C or -20 °C for 4 years. We found that storage temperature did not significantly affect alpha diversity measures, including amplicon sequence variant (ASV) richness and evenness, and abundance of rare sequence variants, nor presence/absence, relative abundances and phylogenetic diversity weighted measures of beta diversity. These results indicate that storage of equine feces at -20 °C for periods ranging from a few months to a few years is equivalent to storage at -80 °C for amplicon-based microbiome studies, adding to accumulating evidence indicating that standard domestic freezers are both economical and effective for microbiome research.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33854827
doi: 10.7717/peerj.10837
pii: 10837
pmc: PMC7953882
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e10837

Informations de copyright

© 2021 Gavriliuc et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Références

mSystems. 2017 Mar 7;2(2):
pubmed: 28289733
Nat Biotechnol. 2017 Nov;35(11):1077-1086
pubmed: 28967885
Nat Methods. 2016 Jul;13(7):581-3
pubmed: 27214047
BMC Microbiol. 2017 Mar 31;17(1):78
pubmed: 28359329
mSystems. 2016 May 3;1(3):
pubmed: 27822526
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 1;12(11):e0187044
pubmed: 29091944
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 06;10(3):e0119355
pubmed: 25748176
Microbiome. 2017 May 5;5(1):52
pubmed: 28476139
BMC Microbiol. 2014 Apr 23;14:103
pubmed: 24758293
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36934
pubmed: 22655031
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2012 Apr;329(2):193-7
pubmed: 22325006
PeerJ. 2019 Dec 2;7:e8133
pubmed: 31824766
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017 May 1;83(10):
pubmed: 28258145
Am J Primatol. 2019 Oct;81(10-11):e22970
pubmed: 30941803
PLoS One. 2015 May 29;10(5):e0126685
pubmed: 26024217
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46953
pubmed: 23071673
Genomics Inform. 2019 Mar;17(1):e6
pubmed: 30929407
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 22;8(4):e61217
pubmed: 23630581
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2018 Aug 28;8:301
pubmed: 30234027
J Anim Ecol. 2020 Dec;89(12):2909-2921
pubmed: 32996590
Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2019 Apr 06;9:104-111
pubmed: 31011533
Nat Biotechnol. 2017 Nov;35(11):1069-1076
pubmed: 28967887
mSystems. 2018 May 15;3(3):
pubmed: 29795809
BMC Bioinformatics. 2015 Oct 06;16:322
pubmed: 26445311
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 4;11(10):e0163666
pubmed: 27701448
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 23;8(1):5143
pubmed: 29572539
Animals (Basel). 2016 Feb 25;6(3):
pubmed: 26927191
Microbiome. 2014 Sep 16;2:31
pubmed: 25228989
Microbiome. 2018 Dec 17;6(1):226
pubmed: 30558668
Trends Ecol Evol. 2014 Oct;29(10):566-71
pubmed: 25175416
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 26;8(1):17367
pubmed: 30478355
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2010 Jun;307(1):80-6
pubmed: 20412303
Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 24;9(1):601
pubmed: 30679604
Microbiome. 2016 Jul 30;4(1):40
pubmed: 27473284
BMC Microbiol. 2018 Dec 27;18(1):227
pubmed: 30591021
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 16;6:31519
pubmed: 27528013
J Microbiol Methods. 2015 Jun;113:16-26
pubmed: 25819008
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Dec;71(12):8228-35
pubmed: 16332807
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2017 Aug 1;41(Supp_1):S154-S167
pubmed: 28830090
Bioinformatics. 2011 Feb 15;27(4):592-3
pubmed: 21169378

Auteurs

Stefan Gavriliuc (S)

Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Mason R Stothart (MR)

Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Astrid Henry (A)

Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Jocelyn Poissant (J)

Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Classifications MeSH