First Pass Success Without Adverse Events Is Reduced Equally with Anatomically Difficult Airways and Physiologically Difficult Airways.
Airway Management
/ adverse effects
Arizona
/ epidemiology
Causality
Clinical Competence
Emergencies
/ epidemiology
Emergency Service, Hospital
/ statistics & numerical data
Female
Humans
Intubation, Intratracheal
/ adverse effects
Male
Middle Aged
Quality Improvement
Respiratory System
/ anatomy & histology
Risk Adjustment
Risk Factors
Treatment Failure
Journal
The western journal of emergency medicine
ISSN: 1936-9018
Titre abrégé: West J Emerg Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101476450
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Feb 2021
01 Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
26
06
2020
accepted:
28
10
2020
entrez:
15
4
2021
pubmed:
16
4
2021
medline:
6
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The goal of emergency airway management is first pass success without adverse events (FPS-AE). Anatomically difficult airways are well appreciated to be an obstacle to this goal. However, little is known about the effect of the physiologically difficult airway with regard to FPS-AE. This study evaluates the effects of both anatomically and physiologically difficult airways on FPS-AE in patients undergoing rapid sequence intubation (RSI) in the emergency department (ED). We analyzed prospectively recorded intubations in a continuous quality improvement database between July 1, 2014-June 30, 2018. Emergency medicine (EM) or emergency medicine/pediatric (EM-PEDS) residents recorded patient, operator, and procedural characteristics on all consecutive adult RSIs performed using a direct or video laryngoscope. The presence of specific anatomically and physiologically difficult airway characteristics were also documented by the operator. Patients were analyzed in four cohorts: 1) no anatomically or physiologically difficult airway characteristics; 2) one or more anatomically difficult airway characteristics; 3) one or more physiologically difficult airway characteristics; and 4) both anatomically and physiologically difficult airway characteristics. The primary outcome was FPS-AE. We performed a multivariable logistic regression analysis to determine the association between anatomically difficult airways or physiologically difficult airways and FPS-AE. A total of 1513 intubations met inclusion criteria and were analyzed. FPS-AE for patients without any difficult airway characteristics was 92.4%, but reduced to 82.1% (difference = -10.3%, 95% confidence interval (CI), -14.8% to -5.6%) with the presence of one or more anatomically difficult airway characteristics, and 81.7% (difference = -10.7%, 95% CI, -17.3% to -4.0%) with the presence of one or more physiologically difficult airway characteristics. FPS-AE was further reduced to 70.9% (difference = -21.4%, 95% CI, -27.0% to -16.0%) with the presence of both anatomically and physiologically difficult airway characteristics. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of FPS-AE was 0.37 [95% CI, 0.21 - 0.66] in patients with anatomically difficult airway characteristics and 0.36 [95% CI, 0.19 - 0.67] for patients with physiologically difficult airway characteristics, compared to patients with no difficult airway characteristics. Patients who had both anatomically and physiologically difficult airway characteristics had a further decreased aOR of FPS-AE of 0.19 [95% CI, 0.11 - 0.33]. FPS-AE is reduced to a similar degree in patients with anatomically and physiologically difficult airways. Operators should assess and plan for potential physiologic difficulty as is routinely done for anatomically difficulty airways. Optimization strategies to improve FPS-AE for patients with physiologically difficult airways should be studied in randomized controlled trials.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33856324
pii: westjem.2020.10.48887
doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.10.48887
pmc: PMC7972367
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
360-368Références
Air Med J. 2015 Mar-Apr;34(2):82-5
pubmed: 25733113
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Apr 15;187(8):832-9
pubmed: 23348979
Crit Care Med. 2020 Jun;48(6):e489-e497
pubmed: 32317603
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Sep;72(3):272-279.e1
pubmed: 29530653
Lancet. 2009 Jul 25;374(9686):293-300
pubmed: 19573904
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Jun;46(6):1278-1280
pubmed: 32322917
Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Apr;7(4):303-312
pubmed: 30898520
West J Emerg Med. 2014 Nov;15(7):930-7
pubmed: 25493156
Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Nov;27(11):1106-1115
pubmed: 32592205
J Emerg Med. 2015 Mar;48(3):280-6
pubmed: 25498851
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Jul;125(1):e18-e21
pubmed: 32402374
Resuscitation. 2013 Nov;84(11):1500-4
pubmed: 23911630
West J Emerg Med. 2019 Jul;20(4):610-618
pubmed: 31316700
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 Dec;21(12):e1126-e1133
pubmed: 32740187
Cureus. 2020 Sep 24;12(9):e10638
pubmed: 33123451
J Emerg Med. 2012 Jun;42(6):629-34
pubmed: 21911279
Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr;46(4):532-539
pubmed: 29261566
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2022 Jan 1;38(1):e126-e131
pubmed: 32576791
Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Dec;60(6):739-48
pubmed: 22560464
Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Dec;7(12):1039-1047
pubmed: 31585796
Crit Care. 2018 Jan 20;22(1):6
pubmed: 29351759
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006 Jul 15;174(2):171-7
pubmed: 16627862
Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;27(12):1241-1248
pubmed: 32896033
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Dec;42(12):1877-1887
pubmed: 27730283
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Dec;16(7):1109-17
pubmed: 26759664
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;20(1):71-8
pubmed: 23574475
J Clin Anesth. 2004 Nov;16(7):508-16
pubmed: 15590254
Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Nov;27(11):1140-1149
pubmed: 32602974
Intensive Care Med. 2010 Feb;36(2):248-55
pubmed: 19921148
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2019 Dec;25(6):597-604
pubmed: 31490206