Cost and clinical outcomes of postoperative intensive care unit versus general floor management in head and neck free flap reconstructive surgery patients.
Free flap
General floor
Head and neck cancer
Healthcare cost
Intensive care unit
Outcomes
Journal
American journal of otolaryngology
ISSN: 1532-818X
Titre abrégé: Am J Otolaryngol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8000029
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
10
03
2021
accepted:
04
04
2021
pubmed:
16
4
2021
medline:
15
12
2021
entrez:
15
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare clinical, surgical, and cost outcomes in patients undergoing head and neck free-flap reconstructive surgery in the setting of postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) against general floor management. Retrospective analysis of head and neck free-flap reconstructive surgery patients at a single tertiary academic medical center. Clinical data was obtained from medical records. Cost data was obtained via the Mayo Clinic Rochester Cost Data Warehouse, which assigns Medicare reimbursement rates to all professional billed services. A total of 502 patients were included, with 82 managed postoperatively in the ICU and 420 on the general floor. Major postoperative outcomes did not differ significantly between groups (Odds Ratio[OR] 1.54; p = 0.41). After covariate adjustments, patients managed in the ICU had a 3.29 day increased average length of hospital stay (Standard Error 0.71; p < 0.0001) and increased need for take-back surgery (OR 2.35; p = 0.02) when compared to the general floor. No significant differences were noted between groups in terms of early free-flap complications (OR 1.38;p = 0.35) or late free-flap complications (Hazard Ratio 0.81; p = 0.61). Short-term cost was $8772 higher in the ICU (range = $5640-$11,903; p < 0.01). Long-term cost did not differ significantly. Postoperative management of head and neck oncologic free-flap patients in the ICU does not significantly improve major postoperative outcomes or free-flap complications when compared to general floor care, but does increase short-term costs. General floor management may be appropriate when cardiopulmonary compromise is not present.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33857778
pii: S0196-0709(21)00130-7
doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103029
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
103029Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.