Predicting offenses among individuals with psychiatric disorders - A machine learning approach.

Computational psychiatry Criminality Forensic psychiatry Machine learning Personalized psychiatry Precision psychiatry

Journal

Journal of psychiatric research
ISSN: 1879-1379
Titre abrégé: J Psychiatr Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0376331

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2021
Historique:
received: 20 10 2020
revised: 09 03 2021
accepted: 11 03 2021
pubmed: 16 4 2021
medline: 6 7 2021
entrez: 15 4 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Actuarial risk estimates are considered the gold-standard way to assess whether psychiatric patients are likely to commit prospective criminal offenses. However, these risk estimates cannot individually predict the type of criminal offense a patient will subsequently commit, and often simply assess the general likelihood of crime occurring in a group sample. In order to advance the predictive utility of risk assessments, better statistical strategies are required. To develop a machine learning model to predict the type of criminal offense committed in a large transdiagnostic sample of psychiatry patients, at an individual level. Machine learning algorithms (Random Forest, Elastic Net, SVM), were applied to a representative and diverse sample of 1240 patients in the forensic mental health system. Clinical, historical, and sociodemographic variables were considered as potential predictors and assessed in a data-driven way. Separate models were created for each type of criminal offense, and feature selection methods were used to improve the interpretability and generalizability of our findings. Sexual offenses can be predicted from nonviolent and violent offenses at an individual level with a sensitivity of 82.44% and specificity of 60.00%, using only 36 variables. Furthermore, in a binary classification model, sexual and violent offenses can be predicted at an individual level with 83.26% sensitivity and 77.42% specificity using only 20 clinical variables. Likewise, non-violent and sexual offenses can be individually predicted with 74.60% sensitivity and 80.65% specificity using 30 clinical variables. The current results suggest that machine learning models can show greater accuracy than gold-standard risk assessment tools (AUCs 0.70-0.80). However, unlike existing risk tools, this approach allows for the prediction of cases at an individual level, which is more clinically useful. Despite this, it is important to note that a large subset of patients in the sample were involved in the criminal system in the past, prior to an official diagnosis. Therefore, many of the variables that predict offenses may be derived from the issues of prior offenses. Irrespective of this, the accuracy of prospective models is expected to only improve with further refinement.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Actuarial risk estimates are considered the gold-standard way to assess whether psychiatric patients are likely to commit prospective criminal offenses. However, these risk estimates cannot individually predict the type of criminal offense a patient will subsequently commit, and often simply assess the general likelihood of crime occurring in a group sample. In order to advance the predictive utility of risk assessments, better statistical strategies are required.
AIM
To develop a machine learning model to predict the type of criminal offense committed in a large transdiagnostic sample of psychiatry patients, at an individual level.
METHOD
Machine learning algorithms (Random Forest, Elastic Net, SVM), were applied to a representative and diverse sample of 1240 patients in the forensic mental health system. Clinical, historical, and sociodemographic variables were considered as potential predictors and assessed in a data-driven way. Separate models were created for each type of criminal offense, and feature selection methods were used to improve the interpretability and generalizability of our findings.
RESULTS
Sexual offenses can be predicted from nonviolent and violent offenses at an individual level with a sensitivity of 82.44% and specificity of 60.00%, using only 36 variables. Furthermore, in a binary classification model, sexual and violent offenses can be predicted at an individual level with 83.26% sensitivity and 77.42% specificity using only 20 clinical variables. Likewise, non-violent and sexual offenses can be individually predicted with 74.60% sensitivity and 80.65% specificity using 30 clinical variables.
CONCLUSION
The current results suggest that machine learning models can show greater accuracy than gold-standard risk assessment tools (AUCs 0.70-0.80). However, unlike existing risk tools, this approach allows for the prediction of cases at an individual level, which is more clinically useful. Despite this, it is important to note that a large subset of patients in the sample were involved in the criminal system in the past, prior to an official diagnosis. Therefore, many of the variables that predict offenses may be derived from the issues of prior offenses. Irrespective of this, the accuracy of prospective models is expected to only improve with further refinement.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33857785
pii: S0022-3956(21)00170-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.03.026
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

146-154

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Devon Watts (D)

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Neuroscience Graduate Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada. Electronic address: wattsd@mcmaster.ca.

Heather Moulden (H)

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada. Electronic address: hmoulden@stjosham.on.ca.

Mini Mamak (M)

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada. Electronic address: mmamak@stjoes.ca.

Casey Upfold (C)

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada. Electronic address: cupfold@stjosham.on.ca.

Gary Chaimowitz (G)

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada. Electronic address: chaimow@mcmaster.ca.

Flávio Kapczinski (F)

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Neuroscience Graduate Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Translacional em Medicina (INCT-TM), Porto Alegre, Brazil. Electronic address: kapczinf@mcmaster.ca.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH