Current practice for safe return-to-play after lateral ankle sprain: A survey among French-speaking physicians.

Ankle sprain Assessment Rehabilitation Sports medicine Surveys and questionnaires

Journal

Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons
ISSN: 1460-9584
Titre abrégé: Foot Ankle Surg
Pays: France
ID NLM: 9609647

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2022
Historique:
received: 12 01 2021
revised: 03 03 2021
accepted: 30 03 2021
pubmed: 17 4 2021
medline: 11 5 2022
entrez: 16 4 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Recommendations are available for assessment criteria for safe return-to-play (RTP) after a lateral ankle sprain. However, their current use among physicians is unknown. French-speaking physicians in Belgium, France and Switzerland were asked to complete an online survey and report their clinical assessment of selected RTP criteria. The respondent sample (n=109) included physicians with and without Sports Medicine education, varied level of experience and proportion of athletes in their practice population. Pain was the most selected criterion for safe RTP (90% of physicians), followed by ability to engage in functional tasks (82%), functional instability (73%), range of motion (61%), proprioception (47%), mechanical instability (39%), strength (38%) and swelling (31%). A low proportion of physicians use quantitative measures to assess these criteria (between 4% and 53%). A large proportion of physicians consider the recommended criteria for RTP decisions. However, physicians do not frequently use quantitative measures.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Recommendations are available for assessment criteria for safe return-to-play (RTP) after a lateral ankle sprain. However, their current use among physicians is unknown.
METHODS METHODS
French-speaking physicians in Belgium, France and Switzerland were asked to complete an online survey and report their clinical assessment of selected RTP criteria.
RESULTS RESULTS
The respondent sample (n=109) included physicians with and without Sports Medicine education, varied level of experience and proportion of athletes in their practice population. Pain was the most selected criterion for safe RTP (90% of physicians), followed by ability to engage in functional tasks (82%), functional instability (73%), range of motion (61%), proprioception (47%), mechanical instability (39%), strength (38%) and swelling (31%). A low proportion of physicians use quantitative measures to assess these criteria (between 4% and 53%).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
A large proportion of physicians consider the recommended criteria for RTP decisions. However, physicians do not frequently use quantitative measures.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33858759
pii: S1268-7731(21)00076-X
doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2021.03.023
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

307-312

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Auteurs

Aude Aguilaniu (A)

University of Liège, Sports Sciences Department, Human Motion Analysis Lab, Liège, Belgium. Electronic address: aude.aguilaniu@uliege.be.

Jean-Louis Croisier (JL)

University of Liège, Sports Sciences Department, Human Motion Analysis Lab, Liège, Belgium; Central University Hospital of Liège, Physical Medicine and Sports Traumatology Department, SportS(2), FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, FIMS Collaborative Centre Sports Medicine, French-speaking Research Network for Athlete Health Protection & Performance (ReFORM) - IOC Research Centre for Prevention of Injury and Protection of Athlete Health, Liège, Belgium.

Cédric Schwartz (C)

University of Liège, Sports Sciences Department, Human Motion Analysis Lab, Liège, Belgium; Central University Hospital of Liège, Physical Medicine and Sports Traumatology Department, SportS(2), FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, FIMS Collaborative Centre Sports Medicine, French-speaking Research Network for Athlete Health Protection & Performance (ReFORM) - IOC Research Centre for Prevention of Injury and Protection of Athlete Health, Liège, Belgium.

Nadia Dardenne (N)

University of Liège, Public Health and Biostatistics Department, Liège, Belgium.

Pieter D'Hooghe (P)

Aspetar Hospital, Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine Department, Doha, Qatar.

Géraldine Martens (G)

Central University Hospital of Liège, Physical Medicine and Sports Traumatology Department, SportS(2), FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, FIMS Collaborative Centre Sports Medicine, French-speaking Research Network for Athlete Health Protection & Performance (ReFORM) - IOC Research Centre for Prevention of Injury and Protection of Athlete Health, Liège, Belgium.

Romain Collin (R)

Central University Hospital of Liège, Physical Medicine and Sports Traumatology Department, SportS(2), FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, FIMS Collaborative Centre Sports Medicine, French-speaking Research Network for Athlete Health Protection & Performance (ReFORM) - IOC Research Centre for Prevention of Injury and Protection of Athlete Health, Liège, Belgium.

Jean-François Kaux (JF)

University of Liège, Sports Sciences Department, Human Motion Analysis Lab, Liège, Belgium; Central University Hospital of Liège, Physical Medicine and Sports Traumatology Department, SportS(2), FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, FIMS Collaborative Centre Sports Medicine, French-speaking Research Network for Athlete Health Protection & Performance (ReFORM) - IOC Research Centre for Prevention of Injury and Protection of Athlete Health, Liège, Belgium.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH