How much time do doctors spend providing care to each child in the ED? A time and motion study.

efficiency emergency care systems emergency department management paediatric emergency medicine paediatrics

Journal

Emergency medicine journal : EMJ
ISSN: 1472-0213
Titre abrégé: Emerg Med J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100963089

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2022
Historique:
received: 12 07 2019
revised: 27 02 2021
accepted: 03 03 2021
pubmed: 17 4 2021
medline: 24 12 2021
entrez: 16 4 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The total time per patient doctors spend providing care in emergency departments (EDs) has implications for the development of evidence-based ED staffing models. We sought to measure the total time taken by doctors to assess and manage individual paediatric patients presenting to two EDs in the Western Cape, South Africa and to compare these averages to the estimated benchmarks used regionally to calculate ED staffing allocations. We conducted a cross-sectional, observational study applying time and motion methodology, using convenience sampling. Data were collected over a 5-week period from 11 December 2015 to 18 January 2016 at Khayelitsha District Hospital Emergency Centre and Tygerberg Hospital Paediatric Emergency and Ambulatory Unit. We assessed total doctor time for each patient stratified by acuity level using the South African Triage Scale. Care was observed for a total of 100 patients. Median age was 21 months (IQR 8-55). Median total doctor time per patient (95% CI) was 31 (22 to 38), 39 (31 to 63), 48 (32 to 63) and 96 (66 to 122) min for triage categories green, yellow, orange and red, respectively. Median timing was significantly higher than the estimated local benchmark for the lowest acuity 'green' triage category (31 min (22 to 38) vs 15 min; p=0.001) and the highest acuity 'red' category (96 min (66 to 122) vs 50 min; p=0.002). Doctor time per patient increased with increasing acuity of triage category and exceeded estimated benchmarks for the highest and lowest acuities. The distinctive methodology can easily be extended to other settings and populations.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The total time per patient doctors spend providing care in emergency departments (EDs) has implications for the development of evidence-based ED staffing models. We sought to measure the total time taken by doctors to assess and manage individual paediatric patients presenting to two EDs in the Western Cape, South Africa and to compare these averages to the estimated benchmarks used regionally to calculate ED staffing allocations.
METHODS METHODS
We conducted a cross-sectional, observational study applying time and motion methodology, using convenience sampling. Data were collected over a 5-week period from 11 December 2015 to 18 January 2016 at Khayelitsha District Hospital Emergency Centre and Tygerberg Hospital Paediatric Emergency and Ambulatory Unit. We assessed total doctor time for each patient stratified by acuity level using the South African Triage Scale.
RESULTS RESULTS
Care was observed for a total of 100 patients. Median age was 21 months (IQR 8-55). Median total doctor time per patient (95% CI) was 31 (22 to 38), 39 (31 to 63), 48 (32 to 63) and 96 (66 to 122) min for triage categories green, yellow, orange and red, respectively. Median timing was significantly higher than the estimated local benchmark for the lowest acuity 'green' triage category (31 min (22 to 38) vs 15 min; p=0.001) and the highest acuity 'red' category (96 min (66 to 122) vs 50 min; p=0.002).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Doctor time per patient increased with increasing acuity of triage category and exceeded estimated benchmarks for the highest and lowest acuities. The distinctive methodology can easily be extended to other settings and populations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33858862
pii: emermed-2019-208903
doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-208903
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Observational Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

23-29

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Robert Stellman (R)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Barnet Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK rstellman@nhs.net.
Department of Paediatrics, Barnet Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Andrew Redfern (A)

Department of Paediatric and Child Health, Stellenbosch University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.

Sa'ad Lahri (S)

Khayelitsha Hospital Emergency Centre, Western Cape, South Africa.
Division of Emergency Medicine, Stellenbosch University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.

Tonya Esterhuizen (T)

Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Stellenbosch University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.

Baljit Cheema (B)

Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH