How much time do doctors spend providing care to each child in the ED? A time and motion study.
efficiency
emergency care systems
emergency department
management
paediatric emergency medicine
paediatrics
Journal
Emergency medicine journal : EMJ
ISSN: 1472-0213
Titre abrégé: Emerg Med J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100963089
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2022
Jan 2022
Historique:
received:
12
07
2019
revised:
27
02
2021
accepted:
03
03
2021
pubmed:
17
4
2021
medline:
24
12
2021
entrez:
16
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The total time per patient doctors spend providing care in emergency departments (EDs) has implications for the development of evidence-based ED staffing models. We sought to measure the total time taken by doctors to assess and manage individual paediatric patients presenting to two EDs in the Western Cape, South Africa and to compare these averages to the estimated benchmarks used regionally to calculate ED staffing allocations. We conducted a cross-sectional, observational study applying time and motion methodology, using convenience sampling. Data were collected over a 5-week period from 11 December 2015 to 18 January 2016 at Khayelitsha District Hospital Emergency Centre and Tygerberg Hospital Paediatric Emergency and Ambulatory Unit. We assessed total doctor time for each patient stratified by acuity level using the South African Triage Scale. Care was observed for a total of 100 patients. Median age was 21 months (IQR 8-55). Median total doctor time per patient (95% CI) was 31 (22 to 38), 39 (31 to 63), 48 (32 to 63) and 96 (66 to 122) min for triage categories green, yellow, orange and red, respectively. Median timing was significantly higher than the estimated local benchmark for the lowest acuity 'green' triage category (31 min (22 to 38) vs 15 min; p=0.001) and the highest acuity 'red' category (96 min (66 to 122) vs 50 min; p=0.002). Doctor time per patient increased with increasing acuity of triage category and exceeded estimated benchmarks for the highest and lowest acuities. The distinctive methodology can easily be extended to other settings and populations.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The total time per patient doctors spend providing care in emergency departments (EDs) has implications for the development of evidence-based ED staffing models. We sought to measure the total time taken by doctors to assess and manage individual paediatric patients presenting to two EDs in the Western Cape, South Africa and to compare these averages to the estimated benchmarks used regionally to calculate ED staffing allocations.
METHODS
METHODS
We conducted a cross-sectional, observational study applying time and motion methodology, using convenience sampling. Data were collected over a 5-week period from 11 December 2015 to 18 January 2016 at Khayelitsha District Hospital Emergency Centre and Tygerberg Hospital Paediatric Emergency and Ambulatory Unit. We assessed total doctor time for each patient stratified by acuity level using the South African Triage Scale.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Care was observed for a total of 100 patients. Median age was 21 months (IQR 8-55). Median total doctor time per patient (95% CI) was 31 (22 to 38), 39 (31 to 63), 48 (32 to 63) and 96 (66 to 122) min for triage categories green, yellow, orange and red, respectively. Median timing was significantly higher than the estimated local benchmark for the lowest acuity 'green' triage category (31 min (22 to 38) vs 15 min; p=0.001) and the highest acuity 'red' category (96 min (66 to 122) vs 50 min; p=0.002).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Doctor time per patient increased with increasing acuity of triage category and exceeded estimated benchmarks for the highest and lowest acuities. The distinctive methodology can easily be extended to other settings and populations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33858862
pii: emermed-2019-208903
doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-208903
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
23-29Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.