Longitudinal Uses of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study.

longitudinal study nonresponse bias response rates survey data survey weights

Journal

Tobacco regulatory science
ISSN: 2333-9748
Titre abrégé: Tob Regul Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101655763

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2021
Historique:
entrez: 16 4 2021
pubmed: 17 4 2021
medline: 17 4 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study is a nationally representative study of the US population on tobacco use and its effects on health, with 3 waves of data collection between 2013 and 2016. Prior work described the methods of the first wave. In this paper, we describe the methods of the subsequent 2 waves and provide recommendations for how to conduct longitudinal analyses of PATH Study data. We use standard survey quality metrics to evaluate the results of the follow-up waves of the PATH Study. The recommendations and examples of longitudinal and cross-sectional analyses of PATH Study data follow a design-based statistical inference framework. The quality metrics indicate that the PATH Study sample of approximately 40,000 continuing respondents remains representative of its target population. Depending on the intended analysis, different survey weights may be appropriate. The PATH Study data are a valuable resource for regulatory scientists interested in longitudinal analysis of tobacco use and its effects on health. The availability of multiple sets of specialized survey weights enables researchers to target a wide range of tobacco-related analytic questions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33860066
doi: 10.18001/trs.7.1.1
pmc: PMC8046027
mid: NIHMS1666911
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

3-16

Subventions

Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : HHSN271201600001C
Pays : United States

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of Interest Disclosure Statement The authors have no conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.

Références

Circulation. 2008 Oct 14;118(16):1675-84
pubmed: 18852378
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2006 Aug;30(4):353-61
pubmed: 16956166
Subst Use Misuse. 2005;40(2):171-85
pubmed: 15770883
Nephron Clin Pract. 2009;113(3):c214-7
pubmed: 19690438
Tob Control. 2017 Jul;26(4):371-378
pubmed: 27507901

Auteurs

Andrea Piesse (A)

Statistics and Evaluation Sciences, Westat, Rockville, MD, United States.

Jean Opsomer (J)

Statistics and Evaluation Sciences, Westat, Rockville, MD, United States.

Sylvia Dohrmann (S)

Statistics and Evaluation Sciences, Westat, Rockville, MD, United States.

Ralph DiGaetano (R)

Statistics and Evaluation Sciences, Westat, Rockville, MD, United States.

David Morganstein (D)

Statistics and Evaluation Sciences, Westat, Rockville, MD, United States.

Kristie Taylor (K)

Behavioral Health and Health Policy, Westat, Rockville, MD, United States.

Charles Carusi (C)

Behavioral Health and Health Policy, Westat, Rockville, MD, United States.

Andrew Hyland (A)

Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, United States.

Classifications MeSH