Indocyanine Green Angiography Precise Marking for Indeterminate Burn Excision: A Prospective, Multi-centered, Double-blinded Study.
Journal
Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open
ISSN: 2169-7574
Titre abrégé: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101622231
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Apr 2021
Historique:
received:
23
12
2020
accepted:
10
02
2021
entrez:
19
4
2021
pubmed:
20
4
2021
medline:
20
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
During burn excision, the clinical judgment whether to excise or not excise the area with indeterminate burn depth is difficult. Indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) has been reported to provide high accuracy in diagnosing indeterminate burns. This study aims to evaluate the complete wound closures in both short-term and long-term outcomes after using ICGA precise marking to guide indeterminate burn excision. This was a prospective, multi-centered, double-blinded, experimental study. The participants were admitted to the hospital with indeterminate burn wounds. ICGA precise marking was performed. The deep second-degree burn was painted, excised, and subsequently covered with skin grafts and measured on day 5. The superficial burns were measured on day 21. All wounds were followed-up at two months. Thirty indeterminate burn sites were included in this study. Using ICGA precise marking, the overall rate of short-term complete wound closure, which combined superficial and deep burns, was found to be as high as 96.7% (29/30). The long-term complete wound closures at two months confirmed the short-term result and yielded 100.0% of complete wound closure. The complete wound closures between the short-term and long-term measurements were not significantly different ( Using ICGA precise marking to guide indeterminate burn excision resulted in an excellent rate of complete wound closure and an insignificant difference between short-term and long-term wound outcomes. ICGA is a competent method to aid decision-making in burn surgery of the indeterminate area.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
During burn excision, the clinical judgment whether to excise or not excise the area with indeterminate burn depth is difficult. Indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) has been reported to provide high accuracy in diagnosing indeterminate burns. This study aims to evaluate the complete wound closures in both short-term and long-term outcomes after using ICGA precise marking to guide indeterminate burn excision.
METHODS
METHODS
This was a prospective, multi-centered, double-blinded, experimental study. The participants were admitted to the hospital with indeterminate burn wounds. ICGA precise marking was performed. The deep second-degree burn was painted, excised, and subsequently covered with skin grafts and measured on day 5. The superficial burns were measured on day 21. All wounds were followed-up at two months.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Thirty indeterminate burn sites were included in this study. Using ICGA precise marking, the overall rate of short-term complete wound closure, which combined superficial and deep burns, was found to be as high as 96.7% (29/30). The long-term complete wound closures at two months confirmed the short-term result and yielded 100.0% of complete wound closure. The complete wound closures between the short-term and long-term measurements were not significantly different (
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Using ICGA precise marking to guide indeterminate burn excision resulted in an excellent rate of complete wound closure and an insignificant difference between short-term and long-term wound outcomes. ICGA is a competent method to aid decision-making in burn surgery of the indeterminate area.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33868880
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003538
pmc: PMC8049159
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e3538Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Disclosure: All the authors have no financial interest in relation to the content of this article. This study was supported by Khon Kaen University Research Fund.
Références
J Burn Care Rehabil. 1994 Sep-Oct;15(5):416-20
pubmed: 7995814
Burns. 2018 Dec;44(8):1930-1939
pubmed: 30509366
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 May;86(5):823-828
pubmed: 30589753
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 May;129(5):1043-1048
pubmed: 22544087
Am J Public Health. 2004 Mar;94(3):361-6
pubmed: 14998794
J Surg Res. 2020 Jan;245:183-197
pubmed: 31421361
Burns Trauma. 2014 Oct 25;2(4):201-5
pubmed: 27602383
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Jan 24;8(1):e2604
pubmed: 32095408
J Burn Care Res. 2018 Feb 20;39(2):268-273
pubmed: 28557868
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Jan;145(1):229e-230e
pubmed: 31651695
Burns. 2001 Jun;27(4):364-71
pubmed: 11348745
Burns. 2006 Dec;32(8):992-9
pubmed: 16901651
J Trauma. 1999 Jun;46(6):1085-8
pubmed: 10372631
Wounds. 2016 Nov;28(11):379-386
pubmed: 27589359
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019 Jul;72(7):1150-1156
pubmed: 30952589
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Dec;88(12 Suppl 2):S3-6
pubmed: 18036978
Surg Innov. 2013 Oct;20(5):516-23
pubmed: 23275469
Can J Plast Surg. 2010 Fall;18(3):e33-6
pubmed: 21886431
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Sep 24;6(9):e1954
pubmed: 30349800
J Burn Care Res. 2019 Jun 21;40(4):513-516
pubmed: 31046089
Arch Dermatol. 1992 Jan;128(1):43-9
pubmed: 1739286
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020 Mar;73(3):608-620
pubmed: 31883625
Wound Repair Regen. 2019 May;27(3):201-224
pubmed: 30767334
J Biomed Opt. 2016 Aug 1;21(8):80901
pubmed: 27533438