Identification of Very Low-Risk Subgroups of Patients with Primary Mediastinal Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated with R-CHOP.
CHOP
Large B-cell lymphoma
Primary mediastinal
Prognostic factors
Rituximab
Journal
The oncologist
ISSN: 1549-490X
Titre abrégé: Oncologist
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9607837
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2021
07 2021
Historique:
received:
05
07
2020
accepted:
02
04
2021
pubmed:
20
4
2021
medline:
13
7
2021
entrez:
19
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
R-CHOP can cure approximately 75% of patients with primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMLBCL), but prognostic factors have not been sufficiently evaluated yet. R-da- EPOCH is potentially more effective but also more toxic than R-CHOP. Reliable prognostic classification is needed to guide treatment decisions. We analyzed the impact of clinical prognostic factors on the outcome of 332 PMLBCL patients ≤65 years treated with R-CHOP ± radiotherapy in a multicenter setting in Greece and Cyprus. With a median follow-up of 69 months, 5-year freedom from progression (FFP) was 78% and 5-year lymphoma specific survival (LSS) was 89%. On multivariate analysis, extranodal involvement (E/IV) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ≥2 times upper limit of normal (model A) were significantly associated with FFP; E/IV and bulky disease (model B) were associated with LSS. Both models performed better than the International Prognostic Index (IPI) and the age-adjusted IPI by Harrel's C rank parameter and Akaike information criterion. Both models A and B defined high-risk subgroups (13%-27% of patients [pts]) with approximately 19%-23% lymphoma-related mortality. They also defined subgroups composing approximately one-fourth or one-half of the patients, with 11% risk of failure and only 1% or 4% 5-year lymphoma-related mortality. The combination of E/IV with either bulky disease or LDH ≥2 times upper limit of normal defined high-risk but not very-high-risk subgroups. More importantly, their absence defined subgroups comprising approximately one-fourth or one-half of the pts, with 11% risk of failure and minimal lymphoma-related mortality, who may not need more intensive treatment such as R-da-EPOCH. By analyzing the impact of baseline clinical characteristics on outcomes of a large cohort of patients with primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma homogeneously treated with R-CHOP with or without radiotherapy, we developed novel prognostic indices which can aid in deciding which patients can be adequately treated with R-CHOP and do not need more intensive regimens such as R-da-EPOCH. The new indices consist of objectively determined characteristics (extranodal disease or stage IV, bulky disease, and markedly elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase), which are readily available from standard initial staging procedures and offer better discrimination compared with established risk scores (International Prognostic Index [IPI] and age-adjusted IPI).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
R-CHOP can cure approximately 75% of patients with primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMLBCL), but prognostic factors have not been sufficiently evaluated yet. R-da- EPOCH is potentially more effective but also more toxic than R-CHOP. Reliable prognostic classification is needed to guide treatment decisions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We analyzed the impact of clinical prognostic factors on the outcome of 332 PMLBCL patients ≤65 years treated with R-CHOP ± radiotherapy in a multicenter setting in Greece and Cyprus.
RESULTS
With a median follow-up of 69 months, 5-year freedom from progression (FFP) was 78% and 5-year lymphoma specific survival (LSS) was 89%. On multivariate analysis, extranodal involvement (E/IV) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ≥2 times upper limit of normal (model A) were significantly associated with FFP; E/IV and bulky disease (model B) were associated with LSS. Both models performed better than the International Prognostic Index (IPI) and the age-adjusted IPI by Harrel's C rank parameter and Akaike information criterion. Both models A and B defined high-risk subgroups (13%-27% of patients [pts]) with approximately 19%-23% lymphoma-related mortality. They also defined subgroups composing approximately one-fourth or one-half of the patients, with 11% risk of failure and only 1% or 4% 5-year lymphoma-related mortality.
CONCLUSION
The combination of E/IV with either bulky disease or LDH ≥2 times upper limit of normal defined high-risk but not very-high-risk subgroups. More importantly, their absence defined subgroups comprising approximately one-fourth or one-half of the pts, with 11% risk of failure and minimal lymphoma-related mortality, who may not need more intensive treatment such as R-da-EPOCH.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE
By analyzing the impact of baseline clinical characteristics on outcomes of a large cohort of patients with primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma homogeneously treated with R-CHOP with or without radiotherapy, we developed novel prognostic indices which can aid in deciding which patients can be adequately treated with R-CHOP and do not need more intensive regimens such as R-da-EPOCH. The new indices consist of objectively determined characteristics (extranodal disease or stage IV, bulky disease, and markedly elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase), which are readily available from standard initial staging procedures and offer better discrimination compared with established risk scores (International Prognostic Index [IPI] and age-adjusted IPI).
Identifiants
pubmed: 33870594
doi: 10.1002/onco.13789
pmc: PMC8265336
doi:
Substances chimiques
Rituximab
4F4X42SYQ6
Vincristine
5J49Q6B70F
Doxorubicin
80168379AG
Cyclophosphamide
8N3DW7272P
Prednisone
VB0R961HZT
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
597-609Informations de copyright
© 2021 AlphaMed Press.
Références
J Clin Oncol. 2003 May 1;21(9):1782-9
pubmed: 12721255
Haematologica. 2001 Feb;86(2):187-91
pubmed: 11224489
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov 20;37(33):3081-3089
pubmed: 31398081
Blood. 2010 Oct 28;116(17):3268-77
pubmed: 20628145
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Dec 1;37(34):3291-3299
pubmed: 31609651
N Engl J Med. 2002 Jan 24;346(4):235-42
pubmed: 11807147
Hematol Oncol. 2013 Mar;31(1):10-7
pubmed: 22610484
Haematologica. 2014 Dec;99(12):1817-25
pubmed: 25216682
J Clin Oncol. 1989 Nov;7(11):1630-6
pubmed: 2809679
Br J Haematol. 2005 Sep;130(5):691-9
pubmed: 16115124
Blood. 1994 Sep 1;84(5):1361-92
pubmed: 8068936
Blood. 2016 Dec 8;128(23):2666-2670
pubmed: 27670424
Ann Hematol. 2009 May;88(5):433-9
pubmed: 18853160
Int J Hematol. 2010 Apr;91(3):456-63
pubmed: 20198460
BMC Cancer. 2017 May 22;17(1):359
pubmed: 28532396
Leuk Lymphoma. 2011 Apr;52(4):604-12
pubmed: 21261504
Ann Oncol. 2006 Jan;17(1):123-30
pubmed: 16236753
Am J Hematol. 2016 Oct;91(10):E436-41
pubmed: 27419920
Blood. 2018 Jul 12;132(2):179-186
pubmed: 29720487
Br J Cancer. 2004 Jan 26;90(2):372-6
pubmed: 14735179
Br J Haematol. 2016 Nov;175(4):668-672
pubmed: 27477167
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jun 10;32(17):1769-75
pubmed: 24799481
Blood. 2014 Feb 6;123(6):837-42
pubmed: 24264230
Leukemia. 2016 Jan;30(1):238-42
pubmed: 25971363
J Clin Oncol. 1999 Apr;17(4):1244
pubmed: 10561185
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 10;28(11):1896-903
pubmed: 20212248
Am J Hematol. 2011 Dec;86(12):E61-4
pubmed: 21898532
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jan;20(1):31-42
pubmed: 30518502
Ann Hematol. 2021 Feb 1;:
pubmed: 33523289
N Engl J Med. 2013 Apr 11;368(15):1408-16
pubmed: 23574119
Stat Med. 1996 Feb 28;15(4):361-87
pubmed: 8668867
Ann Hematol. 2014 Aug;93(8):1297-304
pubmed: 24595734
Haematologica. 2002 Dec;87(12):1258-64
pubmed: 12495899
Br J Haematol. 2018 Feb;180(4):534-544
pubmed: 29265182
J Clin Oncol. 1997 Apr;15(4):1646-53
pubmed: 9193365
Leuk Lymphoma. 2013 Aug;54(8):1684-90
pubmed: 23137070
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Feb 10;25(5):579-86
pubmed: 17242396
Blood. 2015 Aug 20;126(8):950-6
pubmed: 26089397
Cancer Chemother Rep. 1966 Mar;50(3):163-70
pubmed: 5910392
Br J Haematol. 2017 Dec;179(5):739-747
pubmed: 29082519
Cancer Med. 2019 Aug;8(10):4626-4632
pubmed: 31264808
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Sep 1;26(17):4521-4530
pubmed: 32499235
Blood. 2016 May 19;127(20):2375-90
pubmed: 26980727
Oncologist. 2012;17(2):239-49
pubmed: 22282906
Blood. 2020 Dec 10;136(24):2803-2811
pubmed: 32603413
Br J Haematol. 2017 Aug;178(4):588-591
pubmed: 28485042
Anticancer Res. 2014 Nov;34(11):6717-23
pubmed: 25368280
Lancet Oncol. 2008 Feb;9(2):105-16
pubmed: 18226581
Leuk Lymphoma. 2015 Jan;56(1):3-5
pubmed: 24925212
Leuk Res. 2021 Apr 24;107:106595
pubmed: 34038817
Eur J Haematol. 2020 Jan;104(1):59-66
pubmed: 31606909
Ann Oncol. 2011 Mar;22(3):664-670
pubmed: 20724576
Haematologica. 2002 Jul;87(7):701-8; discussion 708
pubmed: 12091120
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Feb 10;25(5):571-8
pubmed: 17242397
N Engl J Med. 1993 Sep 30;329(14):987-94
pubmed: 8141877
J Exp Med. 2003 Sep 15;198(6):851-62
pubmed: 12975453
Blood Cancer J. 2020 May 4;10(5):49
pubmed: 32366834
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma. 2009 Oct;9(5):381-5
pubmed: 19858058
Leuk Lymphoma. 2014 Mar;55(3):538-43
pubmed: 23734654