Ginseng for erectile dysfunction.
Journal
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
ISSN: 1469-493X
Titre abrégé: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100909747
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Apr 2021
19 Apr 2021
Historique:
entrez:
19
4
2021
pubmed:
20
4
2021
medline:
1
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Dietary supplements with ginseng, or ginseng alone, are widely used for a broad range of conditions, including erectile dysfunction. Ginseng is particularly popular in Asian countries. Individual studies assessing its effects are mostly small, of uneven methodological quality and have unclear results. To assess the effects of ginseng on erectile dysfunction. We conducted systematic searches on multiple electronic databases, including CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, AMED, and loco-regional databases of east Asia, from their inceptions to 30 January 2021 without restrictions on language and publication status. Handsearches included conference proceedings. We included randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials that evaluated the use of any type of ginseng as a treatment for erectile dysfunction compared to placebo or conventional treatment. Two authors independently classified studies and three authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias in the included studies. We rated the certainty of evidence according to the GRADE approach. We included nine studies with 587 men with mild to moderate erectile dysfunction, aged from 20 to 70 years old. The studies all compared ginseng to placebo. We found only short-term follow-up data (up to 12 weeks). Primary outcomes Ginseng appears to have a trivial effect on erectile dysfunction when compared to placebo based on the Erectile Function Domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-15 instrument (scale: 1 to 30, higher scores imply better function; mean difference [MD] 3.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.79 to 5.25; I² = 0%; 3 studies; low certainty evidence) assuming a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 4. Ginseng probably also has a trivial effect on erectile function when compared to placebo based on the IIEF-5 instrument (scale: 1 to 25, higher scores imply better function; MD 2.39, 95% CI 0.89 to 3.88; I² = 0%; 3 studies; moderate certainty evidence) assuming a MCID of 5. Ginseng may have little to no effect on adverse events compared to placebo (risk ratio [RR] 1.45, 95% CI 0.69 to 3.03; I² = 0%; 7 studies; low certainty evidence). Based on 86 adverse events per 1000 men in the placebo group, this would correspond to 39 more adverse events per 1000 (95% CI 27 fewer to 174 more). Secondary outcomes Ginseng may improve men's self-reported ability to have intercourse (RR 2.55, 95% CI 1.76 to 3.69; I² = 23%; 6 studies; low certainty evidence). Based on 207 per 1000 men self-reporting the ability to have intercourse in the placebo group, this would correspond to 321 more men (95% CI 158 more to 558 more) per 1000 self-reporting the ability to have intercourse. Ginseng may have a trivial effect on men's satisfaction with intercourse based on the Intercourse Satisfaction Domain of the IIEF-15 (scale: 0 to 15, higher scores imply greater satisfaction; MD 1.19, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.97; I²=0%; 3 studies; low certainty evidence) based on a MCID of 25% improvement from baseline. It may also have a trivial effect on men's satisfaction with intercourse based on item 5 of the IIEF-5 (scale: 0 to 5, higher scores imply more satisfaction; MD 0.60, 95% CI 0.02 to 1.18; 1 study; low certainty evidence) based on a MCID of 25% improvement from baseline. No study reported quality of life as an outcome. We found no trial evidence to inform comparisons to other treatments for erectile dysfunction, such as phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors. We were unable to conduct any predefined subgroup analyses. Based on mostly low certainty evidence, ginseng may only have trivial effects on erectile function or satisfaction with intercourse compared to placebo when assessed using validated instruments. Ginseng may improve men's self-reported ability to have intercourse. It may have little to no effect on adverse events. We found no trial evidence comparing ginseng to other agents with a more established role in treating erectile dysfunction, such as phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Dietary supplements with ginseng, or ginseng alone, are widely used for a broad range of conditions, including erectile dysfunction. Ginseng is particularly popular in Asian countries. Individual studies assessing its effects are mostly small, of uneven methodological quality and have unclear results.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
To assess the effects of ginseng on erectile dysfunction.
SEARCH METHODS
METHODS
We conducted systematic searches on multiple electronic databases, including CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, AMED, and loco-regional databases of east Asia, from their inceptions to 30 January 2021 without restrictions on language and publication status. Handsearches included conference proceedings.
SELECTION CRITERIA
METHODS
We included randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials that evaluated the use of any type of ginseng as a treatment for erectile dysfunction compared to placebo or conventional treatment.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
METHODS
Two authors independently classified studies and three authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias in the included studies. We rated the certainty of evidence according to the GRADE approach.
MAIN RESULTS
RESULTS
We included nine studies with 587 men with mild to moderate erectile dysfunction, aged from 20 to 70 years old. The studies all compared ginseng to placebo. We found only short-term follow-up data (up to 12 weeks). Primary outcomes Ginseng appears to have a trivial effect on erectile dysfunction when compared to placebo based on the Erectile Function Domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-15 instrument (scale: 1 to 30, higher scores imply better function; mean difference [MD] 3.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.79 to 5.25; I² = 0%; 3 studies; low certainty evidence) assuming a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 4. Ginseng probably also has a trivial effect on erectile function when compared to placebo based on the IIEF-5 instrument (scale: 1 to 25, higher scores imply better function; MD 2.39, 95% CI 0.89 to 3.88; I² = 0%; 3 studies; moderate certainty evidence) assuming a MCID of 5. Ginseng may have little to no effect on adverse events compared to placebo (risk ratio [RR] 1.45, 95% CI 0.69 to 3.03; I² = 0%; 7 studies; low certainty evidence). Based on 86 adverse events per 1000 men in the placebo group, this would correspond to 39 more adverse events per 1000 (95% CI 27 fewer to 174 more). Secondary outcomes Ginseng may improve men's self-reported ability to have intercourse (RR 2.55, 95% CI 1.76 to 3.69; I² = 23%; 6 studies; low certainty evidence). Based on 207 per 1000 men self-reporting the ability to have intercourse in the placebo group, this would correspond to 321 more men (95% CI 158 more to 558 more) per 1000 self-reporting the ability to have intercourse. Ginseng may have a trivial effect on men's satisfaction with intercourse based on the Intercourse Satisfaction Domain of the IIEF-15 (scale: 0 to 15, higher scores imply greater satisfaction; MD 1.19, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.97; I²=0%; 3 studies; low certainty evidence) based on a MCID of 25% improvement from baseline. It may also have a trivial effect on men's satisfaction with intercourse based on item 5 of the IIEF-5 (scale: 0 to 5, higher scores imply more satisfaction; MD 0.60, 95% CI 0.02 to 1.18; 1 study; low certainty evidence) based on a MCID of 25% improvement from baseline. No study reported quality of life as an outcome. We found no trial evidence to inform comparisons to other treatments for erectile dysfunction, such as phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors. We were unable to conduct any predefined subgroup analyses.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Based on mostly low certainty evidence, ginseng may only have trivial effects on erectile function or satisfaction with intercourse compared to placebo when assessed using validated instruments. Ginseng may improve men's self-reported ability to have intercourse. It may have little to no effect on adverse events. We found no trial evidence comparing ginseng to other agents with a more established role in treating erectile dysfunction, such as phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33871063
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012654.pub2
pmc: PMC8094213
doi:
Substances chimiques
Placebos
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01479426']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
CD012654Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Cochrane Collaboration.
Références
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4:CD012654
pubmed: 33871063
BJU Int. 1999 Jul;84(1):50-6
pubmed: 10444124
Food Chem Toxicol. 2017 Sep;107(Pt A):362-372
pubmed: 28698154
J Endourol. 2010 Dec;24(12):2051-7
pubmed: 20964486
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Oct 11;8:116
pubmed: 20937092
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jan 1;136(1):42-53
pubmed: 11777363
J Ginseng Res. 2013 Mar;37(1):8-29
pubmed: 23717153
Indian J Urol. 2012 Jan;28(1):15-20
pubmed: 22557711
Investig Clin Urol. 2019 Jul;60(4):275-284
pubmed: 31294137
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011;2011:282151
pubmed: 19592479
Phytother Res. 2008 Jul;22(7):851-8
pubmed: 18567057
Spermatogenesis. 2013 Jul 1;3(3):e26391
pubmed: 24381805
J Ginseng Res. 2012 Oct;36(4):342-53
pubmed: 23717136
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016 Feb 04;2:16003
pubmed: 27188339
J Sex Med. 2010 Feb;7(2 Pt 1):743-50
pubmed: 19751391
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000100
pubmed: 19621070
J Complement Integr Med. 2017 May 11;14(4):
pubmed: 29345436
Adv Food Nutr Res. 2009;55:1-99
pubmed: 18772102
J Ginseng Res. 2014 Apr;38(2):106-15
pubmed: 24748834
Drugs. 2011 Oct 22;71(15):1989-2008
pubmed: 21985167
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 Oct;66(4):444-50
pubmed: 18754850
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:MR000030
pubmed: 23152285
Transl Androl Urol. 2017 Apr;6(2):192-198
pubmed: 28540226
Int J Epidemiol. 2007 Aug;36(4):847-57
pubmed: 17517809
J Sex Marital Ther. 1998 Apr-Jun;24(2):69-73
pubmed: 9611686
Int J Impot Res. 1998 Mar;10(1):37-43
pubmed: 9542688
BMJ Clin Evid. 2011 Jun 29;2011:
pubmed: 21711956
J Ginseng Res. 2014 Jul;38(3):161-6
pubmed: 25378989
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jan;67(1):56-64
pubmed: 24189091
Int J Impot Res. 2013 Mar-Apr;25(2):45-50
pubmed: 23254461
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Aug 5;139(3):161-8
pubmed: 12899583
Mol Biosyst. 2011 Nov;7(11):3094-103
pubmed: 21901208
J Urol. 2002 Nov;168(5):2070-3
pubmed: 12394711
J Urol. 1994 Jan;151(1):54-61
pubmed: 8254833
JAMA. 1995 Feb 1;273(5):408-12
pubmed: 7823387
J Urol. 2005 Nov;174(5):1948-52
pubmed: 16217364
J Ginseng Res. 2018 Jul;42(3):264-269
pubmed: 29983607
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Feb 6;2018:1843142
pubmed: 29546050
Sex Med Rev. 2015 Oct;3(4):279-288
pubmed: 27784600
Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2008 Sep;29(9):1109-18
pubmed: 18718180
Altern Med Rev. 2004 Mar;9(1):4-16
pubmed: 15005641
Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2017;15(6):549-556
pubmed: 28707603
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1993 Nov;54(5):578-83
pubmed: 8222500
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;64(12):1283-93
pubmed: 21839614
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995 Jul;80(7):1985-8
pubmed: 7608245
Transl Androl Urol. 2017 Apr;6(2):167-175
pubmed: 28540223
BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34
pubmed: 9310563
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1997 Mar 15;54(6):692-3
pubmed: 9075501
Int J Endocrinol. 2014;2014:878670
pubmed: 24744785
J Alzheimers Dis. 2009;18(2):339-44
pubmed: 19584437
J Sex Med. 2010 Apr;7(4 Pt 1):1362-80
pubmed: 19929914
Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2019 Apr;97(4):265-276
pubmed: 30395481
J Urol. 1999 Oct;162(4):1508-11
pubmed: 10492246
J Pharm Pract. 2011 Jun;24(3):323-31
pubmed: 21676856
Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83
pubmed: 1593914
J Ginseng Res. 2013 Mar;37(1):1-7
pubmed: 23717152
Lancet Oncol. 2001 Jan;2(1):49-55
pubmed: 11905620
Asian J Androl. 2007 Mar;9(2):241-4
pubmed: 16855773
JAMA. 1993 Jul 7;270(1):83-90
pubmed: 8510302
Rev Urol. 2003;5 Suppl 7:S28-34
pubmed: 16985980
Ann Pharmacother. 2006 Jan;40(1):83-95
pubmed: 16332943
Lancet. 2013 Jan 12;381(9861):153-65
pubmed: 23040455
Int J Impot Res. 1995 Sep;7(3):181-6
pubmed: 8750052
Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 Dec;16(6):699-709
pubmed: 10724796
Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20(13):879-89
pubmed: 12381240
Curr Urol Rep. 2011 Dec;12(6):470-8
pubmed: 21948222
Nat Rev Urol. 2016 May;13(5):266-74
pubmed: 26878803
J Urol. 2000 Feb;163(2):460-3
pubmed: 10647654
Am J Chin Med. 2005;33(3):397-404
pubmed: 16047557
Asian J Androl. 2012 Nov;14(6):830-41
pubmed: 23001440
Andrologia. 2016 Sep;48(7):754-60
pubmed: 26688463
BMJ. 2006 Mar 11;332(7541):589-92
pubmed: 16528082
J Sex Med. 2010 Apr;7(4 Pt 2):1598-607
pubmed: 20388160
Int J Impot Res. 1999 Dec;11(6):319-26
pubmed: 10637462
Eur Urol. 2011 Nov;60(5):1010-6
pubmed: 21855209
Urology. 1997 Jun;49(6):822-30
pubmed: 9187685
Front Aging Neurosci. 2015 Jul 16;7:129
pubmed: 26236231
Am J Chin Med. 2018;46(1):137-155
pubmed: 29298510
Diabetes Care. 2005 May;28(5):1201-3
pubmed: 15855589
J Urol. 2007 May;177(5):1675-81
pubmed: 17437781
J Sex Med. 2008 Mar;5(3):595-601
pubmed: 18208501
BMJ. 2008 May 3;336(7651):995-8
pubmed: 18456631
Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2009 Jun;19(3):298-322
pubmed: 19574616
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):383-94
pubmed: 21195583
BMJ. 2014 Jan 27;348:g129
pubmed: 24468580
Asian J Androl. 2009 May;11(3):356-61
pubmed: 19234482
BJU Int. 2015 May;115(5):815-21
pubmed: 25195970
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2003 Feb;28(1):5-15
pubmed: 12605613
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Feb;82:128-136
pubmed: 27986610
Molecules. 2019 Jun 11;24(11):
pubmed: 31212627