Anatomical and morphometric evaluation of the orbit, eye tunics, eyelids and orbital glands of the captive females of the South African painted dog (Lycaon pictus pictus Temminck, 1820) (Caniformia: Canidae).
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
12
11
2020
accepted:
16
03
2021
entrez:
19
4
2021
pubmed:
20
4
2021
medline:
18
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In this study, we present the first data concerning the anatomical, morphometrical, histological and histochemical study of the orbit, eye tunics, eyelids and orbital glands in South African Painted Dogs (Lycaon pictus pictus). The study was performed using eyeball morphometry, analysis of the bony orbit including its morphometry, macroscopic study, morphometry, histological examination of the eye tunics and chosen accessory organs of the eye and histochemical analysis. The orbit was funnel shaped and was open-type. There was a single ethmoid opening for the ethmoid nerve on the orbital lamina. The pupil was round, while the ciliary body occupied a relatively wide zone. The iris was brown and retina had a pigmented area. The cellular tapetum lucidum was semi-circular and milky and was composed of 14-17 layers of tapetal cells arranged in a bricklike structure. In the lower eyelid, there was a single conjunctival lymph nodule aggregate. One or two additional large conjunctval folds were observed within the posterior surface of the upper eyelids. The superficial gland of the third eyelid had a serous nature. The third eyelid was T-shaped and was composed of hyaline tissue. Two to three conjunctival lymph nodul aggregates were present within the bulbar conjunctiva of the third eyelid. The lacrimal gland produced a sero-mucous secretion. A detailed anatomic analysis of the eye area in the captive South African Painted Dogs females showed the similarities (especially in the histological examination of the eyetunics and orbital glands) as well as the differences between the Painted dog and the other representatives of Canidae. The differences included the shape and size od the orbita with comparison to the domestic dog. Such differences in the orbit measurements are most likely associated with the skull type, which are defined in relation to domestic dogs. The presented results significantly expand the existing knowledge on comparative anatomy in the orbit, eye and chosen accessory organs in wild Canidae.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33872321
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249368
pii: PONE-D-20-35634
pmc: PMC8055035
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0249368Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Anat. 1983 Jan;136(Pt 1):157-64
pubmed: 6833116
Sci Adv. 2015 Aug 07;1(7):e1500391
pubmed: 26601232
Lab Anim Sci. 1985 Jun;35(3):200-10
pubmed: 4021435
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36097
pubmed: 22567127
Anat Histol Embryol. 2001 Feb;30(1):41-8
pubmed: 11284162
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1987 Dec;28(12):1925-32
pubmed: 3679745
Exp Eye Res. 1979 Sep;29(3):291-301
pubmed: 391581
Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2004 Nov;281(1):1095-103
pubmed: 15470670
BMC Vet Res. 2014 May 22;10:116
pubmed: 24886364
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985 Apr;26(4):464-73
pubmed: 2579927
Evol Biol. 2016;43:145-159
pubmed: 27217595
J Anim Ecol. 2013 Sep;82(5):997-1008
pubmed: 23550718
Am J Vet Res. 1988 Sep;49(9):1566-72
pubmed: 3223667
J Exp Biol. 2006 Jan;209(Pt 1):18-25
pubmed: 16354774
J Zoo Wildl Med. 2020 Jun;51(2):280-289
pubmed: 32549556
Ann Anat. 1993 Apr;175(2):127-34
pubmed: 8489033
Vet Ophthalmol. 2016 May;19(3):230-6
pubmed: 26076886
Ann Anat. 2014 Sep;196(5):336-51
pubmed: 25048844
Vet Ophthalmol. 2020 May;23(3):460-471
pubmed: 31961037
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 23;14(10):e0224245
pubmed: 31644568
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 20;8(12):e82355
pubmed: 24376530
BMC Biol. 2012 Feb 27;10:12
pubmed: 22369503
Tohoku J Exp Med. 1985 Mar;145(3):251-7
pubmed: 2408356
J Vet Med Sci. 2014 Aug;76(8):1099-103
pubmed: 24784162
Niger J Physiol Sci. 2017 Dec 30;32(2):153-158
pubmed: 29485635
J Hum Evol. 2006 Aug;51(2):159-70
pubmed: 16620912
Vet Ophthalmol. 2016 Jul;19(4):297-304
pubmed: 26190143
Am J Vet Res. 1990 Feb;51(2):260-3
pubmed: 2301837
Vet Ophthalmol. 2004 Mar-Apr;7(2):113-9
pubmed: 14982590
Anat Histol Embryol. 2008 Feb;37(1):41-51
pubmed: 18197899
Glycoconj J. 2005 Nov;22(7-9):409-16
pubmed: 16311885
Anat Histol Embryol. 1998 Apr;27(2):105-10
pubmed: 9591372
Vet J. 2009 Jan;179(1):70-7
pubmed: 17950639
Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 1998 Jul 8;64(2):107-21
pubmed: 9661261
Vet Ophthalmol. 2004 Jan-Feb;7(1):11-22
pubmed: 14738502
Brain Behav Evol. 1973;7(3):169-202
pubmed: 4712224
Trends Genet. 1993 Jun;9(6):218-24
pubmed: 8337763
Lymphology. 1982 Mar;15(1):32-5
pubmed: 7070114
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1990;228(2):161-8
pubmed: 2338254
AMA Arch Pathol. 1955 Sep;60(3):289-95
pubmed: 13248341
Vet Ophthalmol. 2008 Nov-Dec;11(6):386-94
pubmed: 19046280
Vet Ophthalmol. 2004 Mar-Apr;7(2):71-7
pubmed: 14982585
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Jun;49(6):2322-9
pubmed: 18515578