Mepolizumab for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (SYNAPSE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.
Journal
The Lancet. Respiratory medicine
ISSN: 2213-2619
Titre abrégé: Lancet Respir Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101605555
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2021
10 2021
Historique:
received:
18
12
2020
revised:
29
01
2021
accepted:
11
02
2021
pubmed:
20
4
2021
medline:
23
3
2022
entrez:
19
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps affects approximately 2-4% of the general population, and long-term use of systemic corticosteroids is associated with adverse effects. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of mepolizumab in adults with recurrent, refractory severe bilateral chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. SYNAPSE was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 trial done at 93 centres, mainly hospitals, in 11 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with recurrent, refractory, severe, bilateral nasal polyp symptoms (nasal obstruction symptom visual analogue scale [VAS] score of >5), were eligible for repeat nasal surgery (overall symptoms VAS score >7 and endoscopic nasal polyps score of ≥5, with a minimum score of 2 in each nasal cavity) despite standard of care treatment, and had to have at least one nasal surgery in the past 10 years. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), using permuted block design, to receive either 100 mg mepolizumab subcutaneously or placebo once every 4 weeks, in addition to standard of care (mometasone furoate intranasal spray for at least 8 weeks before screening and during the study, saline nasal irrigations, systemic corticosteroids or antibiotics, or both), as required, for 52 weeks. Site staff, the central study team, and patients were masked to study treatment and absolute blood eosinophil counts. The coprimary endpoints were change from baseline in total endoscopic nasal polyp score at week 52 and in mean nasal obstruction VAS score during weeks 49-52, assessed in the intention-to-treat population (ITT). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03085797. From May 25, 2017, to Dec 12, 2018, 854 patients were screened for eligibility. 414 patients were randomly assigned with 407 included in the ITT population; 206 received mepolizumab and 201 received placebo. Total endoscopic nasal polyp score significantly improved at week 52 from baseline with mepolizumab versus placebo (adjusted difference in medians -0·73, 95% CI -1·11 to -0·34; p<0·0001) and nasal obstruction VAS score during weeks 49-52 also significantly improved (-3·14, -4·09 to -2·18; p<0·0001). Adverse events considered related to study treatment were reported in 30 (15%) of 206 patients receiving mepolizumab and 19 (9%) of 201 receiving placebo. On-treatment serious adverse events occurred in 12 (6%) patients receiving mepolizumab and 13 (6%) receiving placebo; none were considered related to treatment in those receiving mepolizumab. One death was reported in the placebo group (myocardial infarction; death occurred 99 days after the last dose) and was considered unrelated to the treatment. Mepolizumab treatment improved nasal polyp size and nasal obstruction compared with placebo, with no new safety indications, in patients with recurrent, refractory severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. These findings suggest that mepolizumab provides an effective add-on treatment option to standard of care in this population. GlaxoSmithKline.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps affects approximately 2-4% of the general population, and long-term use of systemic corticosteroids is associated with adverse effects. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of mepolizumab in adults with recurrent, refractory severe bilateral chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.
METHODS
SYNAPSE was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 trial done at 93 centres, mainly hospitals, in 11 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with recurrent, refractory, severe, bilateral nasal polyp symptoms (nasal obstruction symptom visual analogue scale [VAS] score of >5), were eligible for repeat nasal surgery (overall symptoms VAS score >7 and endoscopic nasal polyps score of ≥5, with a minimum score of 2 in each nasal cavity) despite standard of care treatment, and had to have at least one nasal surgery in the past 10 years. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), using permuted block design, to receive either 100 mg mepolizumab subcutaneously or placebo once every 4 weeks, in addition to standard of care (mometasone furoate intranasal spray for at least 8 weeks before screening and during the study, saline nasal irrigations, systemic corticosteroids or antibiotics, or both), as required, for 52 weeks. Site staff, the central study team, and patients were masked to study treatment and absolute blood eosinophil counts. The coprimary endpoints were change from baseline in total endoscopic nasal polyp score at week 52 and in mean nasal obstruction VAS score during weeks 49-52, assessed in the intention-to-treat population (ITT). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03085797.
FINDINGS
From May 25, 2017, to Dec 12, 2018, 854 patients were screened for eligibility. 414 patients were randomly assigned with 407 included in the ITT population; 206 received mepolizumab and 201 received placebo. Total endoscopic nasal polyp score significantly improved at week 52 from baseline with mepolizumab versus placebo (adjusted difference in medians -0·73, 95% CI -1·11 to -0·34; p<0·0001) and nasal obstruction VAS score during weeks 49-52 also significantly improved (-3·14, -4·09 to -2·18; p<0·0001). Adverse events considered related to study treatment were reported in 30 (15%) of 206 patients receiving mepolizumab and 19 (9%) of 201 receiving placebo. On-treatment serious adverse events occurred in 12 (6%) patients receiving mepolizumab and 13 (6%) receiving placebo; none were considered related to treatment in those receiving mepolizumab. One death was reported in the placebo group (myocardial infarction; death occurred 99 days after the last dose) and was considered unrelated to the treatment.
INTERPRETATION
Mepolizumab treatment improved nasal polyp size and nasal obstruction compared with placebo, with no new safety indications, in patients with recurrent, refractory severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. These findings suggest that mepolizumab provides an effective add-on treatment option to standard of care in this population.
FUNDING
GlaxoSmithKline.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33872587
pii: S2213-2600(21)00097-7
doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00097-7
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
mepolizumab
90Z2UF0E52
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03085797']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Comment
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1141-1153Investigateurs
Cecilia Ahlström Emanuelsson
(C)
Ledit Ardusso
(L)
Michael Armstrong
(M)
Philip Bardin
(P)
Sara Barnes
(S)
Miguel Bergna
(M)
Christian Betz
(C)
Achim Beule
(A)
James Blotter
(J)
Valeriu Bronescu
(V)
Matthew Brown
(M)
Sean Carrie
(S)
Adam Chaker
(A)
Hyung-Ju Cho
(HJ)
Marie-Noëlle Corriveau
(MN)
Timothy Courville
(T)
Mandy Cuevas
(M)
Cecelia Damask
(C)
Adam DeConde
(A)
Jaime Del Carpio
(J)
María De Salvo
(M)
Hun-Jong Dhong
(HJ)
Stephen Durham
(S)
Anton Edin
(A)
Dale Ehmer
(D)
Pedro Elías
(P)
Adil Fatakia
(A)
Christine Franzese
(C)
Simon Gane
(S)
Gabriel García
(G)
Andrew Gillman
(A)
Moritz Groeger
(M)
Richard Harvey
(R)
Johan Hellgren
(J)
Thomas Higgins
(T)
Jonathan Hobson
(J)
Mattias Jangard
(M)
Arif Janjua
(A)
Naveed Kara
(N)
Sergey Karpischenko
(S)
Edward Kerwin
(E)
Fatimat Khanova
(F)
Shaun Kilty
(S)
Chang-Hoon Kim
(CH)
Seontae Kim
(S)
Ludger Klimek
(L)
Craig LaForce
(C)
Samuel Leong
(S)
Bradley Marple
(B)
Anders Mårtensson
(A)
Jorge Maspero
(J)
Neil Massey
(N)
Jonathan Matz
(J)
Chad McDuffie
(C)
Corina Mella
(C)
Steven Miller
(S)
Ekaterina Mirzabekyan
(E)
Jonathan Moss
(J)
Nayla Mumneh
(N)
Robert Nathan
(R)
Adriana Neagos
(A)
Heidi Olze
(H)
Andrey Ovchinnikov
(A)
Randall Ow
(R)
Dmitriy Polyakov
(D)
Doinel Radeanu
(D)
Chae-Seo Rhee
(CS)
Ramón Rojas
(R)
Jeffrey Rosenbloom
(J)
Sergei Ryazantsev
(S)
Chady Sader
(C)
Pablo Saez Scherbovsky
(P)
Guy Scadding
(G)
Rodney Schlosser
(R)
Heena Shah-Patel
(H)
Ronald Shealy
(R)
Ayesha Siddiqi
(A)
Stacey Silvers
(S)
Narinder Singh
(N)
Doron Sommer
(D)
Weily Soong
(W)
Leigh Sowerby
(L)
Peter Spafford
(P)
Catalin Stefan
(C)
Richard Sterling
(R)
Valeriy Svistushkin
(V)
Neetu Talreja
(N)
Galina Tarasova
(G)
Martha Tarpay
(M)
Alberto Tolcachier
(A)
Karin Toll Toll
(KT)
Carolina van Schaik
(C)
Luke Webb
(L)
H James Wedner
(HJ)
Luis Wehbe
(L)
Soo Whan Kim
(S)
Barbara Wollenberg
(B)
Simon Wright
(S)
Vladimir Yakusevich
(V)
Anahí Yañez
(A)
Yury Yarin
(Y)
David Yen
(D)
Hyo Yeol Kim
(H)
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentOn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests JKH has received consultancy fees from Sanofi Genzyme, Regeneron, Genentech, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, and Gossamer Bio. CB has participated in advisory boards and received speaker fees from Sanofi, Novartis, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, ALK-Abelló, and Meda Pharmaceuticals. WF has received clinical trial funding from Sanofi, Mylan, ALK-Abelló, Allergy Therapeutics, Novartis, and Chordate; and personal fees from Sanofi. MD has received clinical trial funding from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Probionase Therapies, and Sanofi; is an advisory board member for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi; and has equity in Probionase Therapies. MW has received advisory board fees or speaker fees from ALK-Abelló, Allergopharma, AstraZeneca, Bencard Allergie, Genzyme, HAL Allergie, InfectoPharm, LETIPharma, Meda Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Sanofi, Stallergenes Greer, and Teva. SEL has participated in advisory boards and received clinical trial funding from Sanofi Genzyme, Regeneron, Genentech, AstraZeneca, and GlaxoSmithKline. SGS, NM, BM, SWY, ARS, and RC are employees of GlaxoSmithKline and own company stocks and shares. CH has received advisory board fees from Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Olympus, and Smith and Nephew.