Wheeze Recognition Algorithm for Remote Medical Care Device in Children: Validation Study.
algorithm
asthma
children
chronic illness
detection
home management
infant
medical devices
pediatrics
remote
validation
wheeze recognition algorithm
wheezing
Journal
JMIR pediatrics and parenting
ISSN: 2561-6722
Titre abrégé: JMIR Pediatr Parent
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101727244
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Jun 2021
17 Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
17
03
2021
accepted:
16
04
2021
revised:
16
04
2021
pubmed:
21
4
2021
medline:
21
4
2021
entrez:
20
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Since 2020, peoples' lifestyles have been largely changed due to the COVID-19 pandemic worldwide. In the medical field, although many patients prefer remote medical care, this prevents the physician from examining the patient directly; thus, it is important for patients to accurately convey their condition to the physician. Accordingly, remote medical care should be implemented and adaptable home medical devices are required. However, only a few highly accurate home medical devices are available for automatic wheeze detection as an exacerbation sign. We developed a new handy home medical device with an automatic wheeze recognition algorithm, which is available for clinical use in noisy environments such as a pediatric consultation room or at home. Moreover, the examination time is only 30 seconds, since young children cannot endure a long examination time without crying or moving. The aim of this study was to validate the developed automatic wheeze recognition algorithm as a clinical medical device in children at different institutions. A total of 374 children aged 4-107 months in pediatric consultation rooms of 10 institutions were enrolled in this study. All participants aged ≥6 years were diagnosed with bronchial asthma and patients ≤5 years had reported at least three episodes of wheezes. Wheezes were detected by auscultation with a stethoscope and recorded for 30 seconds using the wheeze recognition algorithm device (HWZ-1000T) developed based on wheeze characteristics following the Computerized Respiratory Sound Analysis guideline, where the dominant frequency and duration of a wheeze were >100 Hz and >100 ms, respectively. Files containing recorded lung sounds were assessed by each specialist physician and divided into two groups: 177 designated as "wheeze" files and 197 as "no-wheeze" files. Wheeze recognitions were compared between specialist physicians who recorded lung sounds and those recorded using the wheeze recognition algorithm. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for all recorded sound files, and evaluated the influence of age and sex on the wheeze detection sensitivity. Detection of wheezes was not influenced by age and sex. In all files, wheezes were differentiated from noise using the wheeze recognition algorithm. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the wheeze recognition algorithm were 96.6%, 98.5%, 98.3%, and 97.0%, respectively. Wheezes were automatically detected, and heartbeat sounds, voices, and crying were automatically identified as no-wheeze sounds by the wheeze recognition algorithm. The wheeze recognition algorithm was verified to identify wheezing with high accuracy; therefore, it might be useful in the practical implementation of asthma management at home. Only a few home medical devices are available for automatic wheeze detection. The wheeze recognition algorithm was verified to identify wheezing with high accuracy and will be useful for wheezing management at home and in remote medical care.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Since 2020, peoples' lifestyles have been largely changed due to the COVID-19 pandemic worldwide. In the medical field, although many patients prefer remote medical care, this prevents the physician from examining the patient directly; thus, it is important for patients to accurately convey their condition to the physician. Accordingly, remote medical care should be implemented and adaptable home medical devices are required. However, only a few highly accurate home medical devices are available for automatic wheeze detection as an exacerbation sign.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
We developed a new handy home medical device with an automatic wheeze recognition algorithm, which is available for clinical use in noisy environments such as a pediatric consultation room or at home. Moreover, the examination time is only 30 seconds, since young children cannot endure a long examination time without crying or moving. The aim of this study was to validate the developed automatic wheeze recognition algorithm as a clinical medical device in children at different institutions.
METHODS
METHODS
A total of 374 children aged 4-107 months in pediatric consultation rooms of 10 institutions were enrolled in this study. All participants aged ≥6 years were diagnosed with bronchial asthma and patients ≤5 years had reported at least three episodes of wheezes. Wheezes were detected by auscultation with a stethoscope and recorded for 30 seconds using the wheeze recognition algorithm device (HWZ-1000T) developed based on wheeze characteristics following the Computerized Respiratory Sound Analysis guideline, where the dominant frequency and duration of a wheeze were >100 Hz and >100 ms, respectively. Files containing recorded lung sounds were assessed by each specialist physician and divided into two groups: 177 designated as "wheeze" files and 197 as "no-wheeze" files. Wheeze recognitions were compared between specialist physicians who recorded lung sounds and those recorded using the wheeze recognition algorithm. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for all recorded sound files, and evaluated the influence of age and sex on the wheeze detection sensitivity.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Detection of wheezes was not influenced by age and sex. In all files, wheezes were differentiated from noise using the wheeze recognition algorithm. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the wheeze recognition algorithm were 96.6%, 98.5%, 98.3%, and 97.0%, respectively. Wheezes were automatically detected, and heartbeat sounds, voices, and crying were automatically identified as no-wheeze sounds by the wheeze recognition algorithm.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The wheeze recognition algorithm was verified to identify wheezing with high accuracy; therefore, it might be useful in the practical implementation of asthma management at home. Only a few home medical devices are available for automatic wheeze detection. The wheeze recognition algorithm was verified to identify wheezing with high accuracy and will be useful for wheezing management at home and in remote medical care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33875413
pii: v4i2e28865
doi: 10.2196/28865
pmc: PMC8277407
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e28865Informations de copyright
©Chizu Habukawa, Naoto Ohgami, Takahiko Arai, Haruyuki Makata, Morimitsu Tomikawa, Tokihiko Fujino, Tetsuharu Manabe, Yoshihito Ogihara, Kiyotaka Ohtani, Kenichiro Shirao, Kazuko Sugai, Kei Asai, Tetsuya Sato, Katsumi Murakami. Originally published in JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting (https://pediatrics.jmir.org), 17.06.2021.
Références
Eur Respir J. 2000 Oct;16(4):593-7
pubmed: 11106197
Breathe (Sheff). 2017 Jun;13(2):e27-e36
pubmed: 28966692
J Fam Pract. 2004 Jan;53(1):53
pubmed: 14709268
Chest. 1984 Nov;86(5):718-22
pubmed: 6488909
Eur J Intern Med. 2009 May;20(3):323-7
pubmed: 19393502
Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2012 Nov;12(4):249-55
pubmed: 23198941
BMC Genomics. 2020 Jan 2;21(1):6
pubmed: 31898477
Physiol Meas. 2016 Dec;37(12):2170-2180
pubmed: 27869106
J Med Life. 2018 Apr-Jun;11(2):89-106
pubmed: 30140315
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2004 Mar;37(3):193-200
pubmed: 14966812
Respiration. 2008;75(1):60-72
pubmed: 17551264
Arch Dis Child. 2000 Apr;82(4):327-32
pubmed: 10735844
Arch Intern Med. 1983 May;143(5):890-2
pubmed: 6679232
Eur Respir J. 1995 Nov;8(11):1942-8
pubmed: 8620967
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2011 Nov;58(11):3078-87
pubmed: 21712152
Clin Exp Allergy. 2013 Oct;43(10):1160-70
pubmed: 24074334
Allergol Int. 2017 Apr;66(2):190-204
pubmed: 28108245
J Orthop Sci. 2015 Mar;20(2):264-80
pubmed: 25687654
BMC Pediatr. 2007 Jun 02;7:22
pubmed: 17543129
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Jan 17;17(1):
pubmed: 28106747
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2014 Feb;49(2):126-31
pubmed: 23765632
Respir Care. 2008 Mar;53(3):355-69
pubmed: 18291053
Chest. 1978 Mar;73(3):399-405
pubmed: 630938
Eur Respir J. 2003 Apr;21(4):621-6
pubmed: 12762346
Comput Biol Med. 2007 Aug;37(8):1073-83
pubmed: 17113064
Respir Med. 2011 Sep;105(9):1396-403
pubmed: 21676606
Respir Care. 2008 Oct;53(10):1304-9
pubmed: 18811991
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2004;2004:3832-5
pubmed: 17271131
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 8;15(10):e0240048
pubmed: 33031408
Eur Respir J. 2008 Oct;32(4):1096-110
pubmed: 18827155
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;21(1):1-7
pubmed: 24583708