Automated measurement of iris surface smoothness using anterior segment optical coherence tomography.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 04 2021
19 04 2021
Historique:
received:
24
12
2020
accepted:
23
03
2021
entrez:
20
4
2021
pubmed:
21
4
2021
medline:
9
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Fuchs uveitis (FU) is a chronic and often unilateral ocular inflammation and characteristic iris atrophic changes, other than heterochromia, are common in FU and are key to the correct diagnosis in many cases. With the advent of anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), some investigators attempted to quantitatively study these atrophic changes; mostly by introducing various methods to measure iris thickness in AS-OCT images. We aimed to present an automated method in an observational case series to measure the smoothness index (SI) of the iris surface in AS-OCT images. The ratio of the length of the straight line connecting the most peripheral and central points of the anterior iris border (in nasal and temporal sides) to the actual length of this border on AS-OCT images, was defined as SI. In a uveitis referral center, twenty-two eyes of 11 patients with unilateral Fuchs uveitis (FU) (7 female) and 22 eyes of 11 healthy control subjects underwent AS-OCT imaging. Image J and a newly developed MATLAB algorithm were used for manual and automated SI measurements, respectively. Agreement between manual and automated measurements was evaluated with Bland-Altman analysis and interclass correlation coefficient. The inter-eye difference of SI was compared between the FU group and the control group. Automated mean overall SI was 0.868 ± 0.037 and 0.840 ± 0.039 in FU and healthy fellow eyes, respectively (estimated mean difference = - 0.028, 95% CI [- 0.038, - 0.018], p < 0.001). Bland- Altman plots showed good agreement between two methods in both healthy and FU eyes. The interclass correlation coefficient between the manual and automated measurements in the FU and healthy fellow eyes was 0.958 and 0.964, respectively. The inter-eye difference of overall SI was 0.029 ± 0.015 and 0.012 ± 0.008 in FU group and control group, respectively (p = 0.01). We concluded that the automated algorithm can rapidly and conveniently measure SI with results comparable to the manual method.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33875715
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87954-w
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-87954-w
pmc: PMC8055699
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
8505Références
Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2019;27(7):1077-1085
pubmed: 30059646
Int Ophthalmol. 2013 Jun;33(3):245-50
pubmed: 23277205
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 Jul;257(7):1489-1498
pubmed: 31104138
Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2020 Sep 23;:1-6
pubmed: 32966151
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2008 Sep-Oct;15(5):285-93
pubmed: 18850464
Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2017;25(sup1):S75-S80
pubmed: 29083984
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep-Oct;42(7):615-22
pubmed: 24330237
Acta Ophthalmol. 2008 Feb;86(1):58-64
pubmed: 17986291
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec;257(12):2799-2800
pubmed: 31680198
Surv Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar - Apr;65(2):133-143
pubmed: 31622627
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2019 Apr 4;8(2):11
pubmed: 30972232
Semin Ophthalmol. 2005 Jul-Sep;20(3):143-6
pubmed: 16282147
Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep;98(9):1245-9
pubmed: 24735773
J Glaucoma. 2019 Mar;28(3):194-200
pubmed: 30585936
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2005 Dec;16(6):356-63
pubmed: 16264346