Nuclease Hydrolysis Does Not Drive the Rapid Signaling Decay of DNA Aptamer-Based Electrochemical Sensors in Biological Fluids.
Journal
Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids
ISSN: 1520-5827
Titre abrégé: Langmuir
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9882736
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 05 2021
04 05 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
21
4
2021
medline:
22
6
2021
entrez:
20
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Electrochemical aptamer-based (E-AB) sensors are a technology capable of real-time monitoring of drug concentrations directly in the body. These sensors achieve their selectivity from surface-attached aptamers, which alter their conformation upon target binding, thereby causing a change in electron transfer kinetics between aptamer-bound redox reporters and the electrode surface. Because, in theory, aptamers can be selected for nearly any target of interest, E-AB sensors have far-reaching potential for diagnostic and biomedical applications. However, a remaining critical weakness in the platform lies in the time-dependent, spontaneous degradation of the bioelectronic interface. This progressive degradation-seen in part as a continuous drop in faradaic current from aptamer-attached redox reporters-limits the in vivo operational life of E-AB sensors to less than 12 h, prohibiting their long-term application for continuous molecular monitoring in humans. In this work, we study the effects of nuclease action on the signaling lifetime of E-AB sensors, to determine whether the progressive signal loss is caused by hydrolysis of DNA aptamers and thus the loss of signaling moieties from the sensor surface. We continuously interrogate sensors deployed in several undiluted biological fluids at 37 °C and inject nuclease to reach physiologically relevant concentrations. By employing both naturally occurring d-DNA and the nuclease-resistant enantiomer l-DNA, we determine that within the current lifespan of state-of-the-art E-AB sensors, nuclease hydrolysis is not the dominant cause of sensor signal loss under the conditions we tested. Instead, signal loss is driven primarily by the loss of monolayer elements-both blocking alkanethiol and aptamer monolayers-from the electrode surface. While use of l-DNA aptamers may extend the E-AB operational life in the long term, the critical issue of passive monolayer loss must be addressed before those effects can be seen.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33876937
doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c00166
pmc: PMC8176561
mid: NIHMS1704802
doi:
Substances chimiques
Aptamers, Nucleotide
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
5213-5221Subventions
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R35 GM124974
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : SC2 GM127268
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Anal Chem. 2016 Feb 2;88(3):1850-5
pubmed: 26691677
Anal Chem. 2021 Jan 19;93(2):812-819
pubmed: 33395261
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jan 24;114(4):645-650
pubmed: 28069939
Nucleic Acid Ther. 2012 Dec;22(6):366-70
pubmed: 23181700
Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif). 2016 Jun 12;9(1):163-81
pubmed: 27070185
Curr Med Chem. 2011;18(27):4126-38
pubmed: 21838692
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Oct 14;94(21):11285-90
pubmed: 9326601
ACS Synth Biol. 2021 Jan 15;10(1):209-212
pubmed: 33347747
Biochemistry. 2013 Dec 3;52(48):8652-62
pubmed: 24175947
Langmuir. 2008 Sep 16;24(18):10513-8
pubmed: 18690727
Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1987 Apr;14(3):231-40
pubmed: 2820305
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020 Mar 4;12(9):11214-11223
pubmed: 32040915
Nat Commun. 2014 Jul 07;5:4348
pubmed: 25000336
Science. 1999 Mar 12;283(5408):1727-30
pubmed: 10073936
Nat Protoc. 2007;2(11):2875-80
pubmed: 18007622
Chemistry. 2019 Jun 18;25(34):7981-7990
pubmed: 30913332
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Mar 16;46(5):2204-2217
pubmed: 29390093
Bioelectrochemistry. 2009 Sep;76(1-2):208-13
pubmed: 19362061
Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2012 Sep 18;1:e47
pubmed: 23344239
Anal Chem. 2009 Feb 1;81(3):1095-100
pubmed: 19133790
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006 Sep;1075:191-6
pubmed: 17108211
Anal Chem. 2016 Dec 6;88(23):11654-11662
pubmed: 27805364
J Am Chem Soc. 2012 Nov 21;134(46):18908-11
pubmed: 23126671
Biomed Rep. 2017 Oct;7(4):319-324
pubmed: 29085628
Talanta. 2017 Mar 1;164:662-667
pubmed: 28107987
Trends Biotechnol. 1993 Sep;11(9):384-6
pubmed: 7691090
J Am Chem Soc. 2006 Mar 15;128(10):3138-9
pubmed: 16522082
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(2):687-700
pubmed: 17182632
Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Apr;39(7):2483-91
pubmed: 21071403
Anal Chem. 2019 Oct 1;91(19):12321-12328
pubmed: 31462040
Nucleic Acids Res. 2020 Feb 28;48(4):1669-1680
pubmed: 31950158
Anal Chem. 2020 May 5;92(9):6470-6477
pubmed: 32249564
Chem Sci. 2015 Mar 1;6(3):2122
pubmed: 30124684
Bioorg Med Chem. 2015 May 15;23(10):2593-7
pubmed: 25858454
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Oct 27;32(19):5757-65
pubmed: 15509871