Telemedicine follow-up is safe and efficacious for synthetic midurethral slings: a randomized, multi-institutional control trial.
Midurethral sling
Patient satisfaction
Postoperative care
Stress urinary incontinence
Telemedicine
Journal
International urogynecology journal
ISSN: 1433-3023
Titre abrégé: Int Urogynecol J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101567041
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2022
04 2022
Historique:
received:
17
08
2020
accepted:
10
03
2021
pubmed:
21
4
2021
medline:
23
4
2022
entrez:
20
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The objective was to assess whether telemedicine-based follow-up is equivalent to office-based follow-up in the early postoperative period after routine synthetic midurethral sling placement. This is a prospective, international, multi-institutional, randomized controlled trial. Patients undergoing synthetic midurethral sling placement were randomized to 3-week postoperative telemedicine versus office-based follow-up. The primary outcome was the rate of unplanned events. Secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction, crossover from telemedicine to office-based follow-up, and compliance with 3- to 5-month office follow-up. We included 238 patients (telemedicine: 121 vs office: 117). No differences in demographics or medical comorbidities were noted between the study groups (p = 0.09-1.0). No differences were noted in unplanned events: hospital admission, emergency department visit, or unplanned office visit or call (14% vs 12.9%, p = 0.85) or complications (9.9% vs 8.6%, p = 0.82). Both groups were equally "very satisfied" with their surgical outcomes (71.1% vs 69%, p = 0.2). Telemedicine patients were more compliant with 3- to 5-month office follow-up (90.1% vs 79.3%, p = 0.04). After synthetic midurethral sling placement, telemedicine follow-up is a safe patient communication option in the early postoperative period. Telemedicine patients reported no difference in satisfaction compared with office-based follow-up but had greater compliance with 3- to 5-month follow-up.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33877376
doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04767-1
pii: 10.1007/s00192-021-04767-1
pmc: PMC8056194
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1007-1015Informations de copyright
© 2021. The International Urogynecological Association.
Références
J Hum Reprod Sci. 2011 Jan;4(1):8-11
pubmed: 21772732
JAMA Surg. 2013 Sep;148(9):823-7
pubmed: 23842982
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 31;7:CD006375
pubmed: 28756647
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Jun;31(6):1063-1089
pubmed: 32342112
Can Urol Assoc J. 2012 Oct;6(5 Suppl 2):S120-2
pubmed: 23092771
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 May;27(5):787-90
pubmed: 26590807
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Jun;32(6):1489-1495
pubmed: 32388632
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 3;362(22):2066-76
pubmed: 20479459
Med Clin North Am. 2018 Mar;102(2):387-398
pubmed: 29406066
Urology. 2020 Feb;136:82-87
pubmed: 31726182
Surgery. 2018 Apr;163(4):672-679
pubmed: 29398042
Urology. 2020 Jan;135:38-43
pubmed: 31600558
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Oct;30(10):1639-1646
pubmed: 30783704
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Dec;27(12):1873-1877
pubmed: 27311601