Complex sexually dimorphic traits shape the parallel evolution of a novel reproductive strategy in Sulawesi ricefishes (Adrianichthyidae).
Adrianichthys
Maternal care
Oryzias
Rib length
Ribs
Sexual antagonistic selection
Sexual dimorphism
Journal
BMC ecology and evolution
ISSN: 2730-7182
Titre abrégé: BMC Ecol Evol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101775613
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 04 2021
20 04 2021
Historique:
received:
09
10
2020
accepted:
09
04
2021
entrez:
21
4
2021
pubmed:
22
4
2021
medline:
24
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Pelvic brooding is a form of uni-parental care, and likely evolved in parallel in two lineages of Sulawesi ricefishes. Contrary to all other ricefishes, females of pelvic brooding species do not deposit eggs at a substrate (transfer brooding), but carry them until the fry hatches. We assume that modifications reducing the costs of egg carrying are beneficial for pelvic brooding females, but likely disadvantageous in conspecific males, which might be resolved by the evolution of sexual dimorphism via sexual antagonistic selection. Thus we hypothesize that the evolution of pelvic brooding gave rise to female-specific skeletal adaptations that are shared by both pelvic brooding lineages, but are absent in conspecific males and transfer brooding species. To tackle this, we combine 3D-imaging and morphometrics to analyze skeletal adaptations to pelvic brooding. The morphology of skeletal traits correlated with sex and brooding strategy across seven ricefish species. Pelvic brooding females have short ribs caudal of the pelvic girdle forming a ventral concavity and clearly elongated and thickened pelvic fins compared to both sexes of transfer brooding species. The ventral concavity limits the body cavity volume in female pelvic brooders. Thus body volumes are smaller compared to males in pelvic brooding species, a pattern sharply contrasted by transfer brooding species. We showed in a comparative framework that highly similar, sexually dimorphic traits evolved in parallel in both lineages of pelvic brooding ricefish species. Key traits, present in all pelvic brooding females, were absent or much less pronounced in conspecific males and both sexes of transfer brooding species, indicating that they are non-beneficial or even maladaptive for ricefishes not providing extended care. We assume that the combination of ventral concavity and robust, elongated fins reduces drag of brooding females and provides protection and stability to the egg cluster. Thus ricefishes are one of the rare examples where environmental factors rather than sexual selection shaped the evolution of sexually dimorphic skeletal adaptations.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Pelvic brooding is a form of uni-parental care, and likely evolved in parallel in two lineages of Sulawesi ricefishes. Contrary to all other ricefishes, females of pelvic brooding species do not deposit eggs at a substrate (transfer brooding), but carry them until the fry hatches. We assume that modifications reducing the costs of egg carrying are beneficial for pelvic brooding females, but likely disadvantageous in conspecific males, which might be resolved by the evolution of sexual dimorphism via sexual antagonistic selection. Thus we hypothesize that the evolution of pelvic brooding gave rise to female-specific skeletal adaptations that are shared by both pelvic brooding lineages, but are absent in conspecific males and transfer brooding species. To tackle this, we combine 3D-imaging and morphometrics to analyze skeletal adaptations to pelvic brooding.
RESULTS
The morphology of skeletal traits correlated with sex and brooding strategy across seven ricefish species. Pelvic brooding females have short ribs caudal of the pelvic girdle forming a ventral concavity and clearly elongated and thickened pelvic fins compared to both sexes of transfer brooding species. The ventral concavity limits the body cavity volume in female pelvic brooders. Thus body volumes are smaller compared to males in pelvic brooding species, a pattern sharply contrasted by transfer brooding species.
CONCLUSIONS
We showed in a comparative framework that highly similar, sexually dimorphic traits evolved in parallel in both lineages of pelvic brooding ricefish species. Key traits, present in all pelvic brooding females, were absent or much less pronounced in conspecific males and both sexes of transfer brooding species, indicating that they are non-beneficial or even maladaptive for ricefishes not providing extended care. We assume that the combination of ventral concavity and robust, elongated fins reduces drag of brooding females and provides protection and stability to the egg cluster. Thus ricefishes are one of the rare examples where environmental factors rather than sexual selection shaped the evolution of sexually dimorphic skeletal adaptations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33879056
doi: 10.1186/s12862-021-01791-z
pii: 10.1186/s12862-021-01791-z
pmc: PMC8056572
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
57Références
Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 Jan;23(1):26-32
pubmed: 18022278
J Evol Biol. 2006 May;19(3):741-54
pubmed: 16674571
J Hered. 2001 Mar-Apr;92(2):159-66
pubmed: 11396574
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Aug 7;268(1476):1583-8
pubmed: 11487405
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3):
pubmed: 24403724
Zoolog Sci. 2014 Nov;31(11):703-8
pubmed: 25366151
Evolution. 1990 Mar;44(2):315-331
pubmed: 28564385
Science. 2002 Nov 1;298(5595):1018-20
pubmed: 12411703
Science. 2000 Jul 21;289(5478):441-3
pubmed: 10903203
Elife. 2019 Jul 09;8:
pubmed: 31287418
Ecol Evol. 2014 Aug;4(16):3236-43
pubmed: 25473476
Bioinformatics. 2004 Jan 22;20(2):289-90
pubmed: 14734327
J Comp Physiol B. 2009 Apr;179(3):325-33
pubmed: 19005657
J Morphol. 2009 Apr;270(4):389-412
pubmed: 19107939
Nat Methods. 2012 Jun 28;9(7):676-82
pubmed: 22743772
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Aug 28;286(1909):20191050
pubmed: 31431167
J Fish Biol. 2010 Oct;77(6):1173-208
pubmed: 21039499
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 May;24(5):280-8
pubmed: 19307043
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Sep;24(9):487-96
pubmed: 19500875
Zoolog Sci. 2007 Nov;24(11):1122-7
pubmed: 18348613
Science. 1977 Jul 15;197(4300):215-23
pubmed: 327542
Oecologia. 2006 Jun;148(2):235-49
pubmed: 16485098
J Evol Biol. 2010 Jun 1;23(6):1234-44
pubmed: 20406345
J Morphol. 2008 Jun;269(6):745-50
pubmed: 18302190
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49734
pubmed: 23166759
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 10;10:2767
pubmed: 31920819
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2015 Dec;93:150-60
pubmed: 26256644
Evolution. 2005 Jul;59(7):1570-8
pubmed: 16153042
Evolution. 1984 May;38(3):622-630
pubmed: 28555984
PLoS One. 2011 Jan 24;6(1):e16557
pubmed: 21283632
Data Brief. 2015 Sep 03;5:281-4
pubmed: 26543892