Creating space for Indigenous perspectives on access and benefit-sharing: Encouraging researcher use of the Local Contexts Notices.
biocultural labels and notices
indigenous data sovereignty
nagoya protocol
research ethics
Journal
Molecular ecology
ISSN: 1365-294X
Titre abrégé: Mol Ecol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9214478
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2021
06 2021
Historique:
revised:
02
04
2021
received:
24
02
2021
accepted:
06
04
2021
pubmed:
22
4
2021
medline:
22
6
2021
entrez:
21
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A recent Molecular Ecology editorial made a proactive statement of support for the "Nagoya Protocol" and the principle of benefit-sharing by requiring authors to provide a "Data Accessibility and Benefit-Sharing Statement" in their articles. Here, we encourage another step that enables Indigenous communities to provide their own definitions and aspirations for access and benefit-sharing alongside the author's "Statement". We invite the Molecular Ecology research community to use Biocultural-, Traditional Knowledge-, and Cultural Institution Notices to help Indigenous communities gain visibility within our research structures. Notices are one of the tools offered by the Biocultural Labels Initiative (part of the Local Contexts system) designed specifically for researchers and institutions. The Notices are highly visible, machine-readable icons that signal the Indigenous provenance of genetic resources, and rights of Indigenous communities to define the future use of genetic resources and derived benefits. The Notices invite collaboration with Indigenous communities and create spaces within our research systems for them to define the provenance, protocols, and permissions associated with genetic resources using Labels. Authors contributing to Molecular Ecology can apply Notices to their articles by providing the persistent unique identifier and an optional use-statement associated with the Notice in their "Data Accessibility and Benefit-Sharing Statement". In this way, our research community has an opportunity to accelerate support for the principles of the Nagoya Protocol, to alleviate concerns regarding Indigenous Data Sovereignty and equitable outcomes, and to build better relationships with Indigenous collaborators to enhance research, biodiversity, and conservation outcomes.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2477-2482Informations de copyright
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Anderson, J. (2012). Options for the future protection of GRTKTCES: The traditional knowledge license and labels initiative. Journal of World Intellectual Property Organization, 4(1), 66-75.
Anderson, J., & Christen, K. (2019). Traditional knowledge (TK) Labels. Retrieved from https://localcontexts.org/ tk-labels/
Anderson, J., & Hudson, M. (2020). The Biocultural Labels Initiative: Supporting Indigenous rights in data derived from genetic resources. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards, 4, e59230. https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.4.59230.
Carroll, S. R., Garba, I., Figueroa-Rodríguez, O. L., Holbrook, J., Lovett, R., Materechera, S., & Sara, R. (2020). The CARE principles for indigenous data governance. Data Science Journal, 19(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-043/.
Cochrane, G., Karsch-Mizrachi, I., Takagi, T., Collaboration, S. D., & Sequence Database Collaboration IN, (2016). The international nucleotide sequence database collaboration. Nucleic Acids Research, 44(1), 48-50. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1323.
Deck, J., Gaither, M. R., Ewing, R., Bird, C. E., Davies, N., Meyer, C., Rininos, C., Toonen, R. J., & Crandall, E. D. (2017). The Genomic Observatories Metadatabase (GeOMe): A new repository for field and sampling event metadata associated with genetic samples. PLOS Biology, 15(8), e2002925. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2002925.
Editorial, (2020). Better together. Nature Reviews Genetics, 21, 333. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-020-0238-8.
Garrison, N. A., Hudson, M., Ballantyne, L. L., Garba, I., Martinez, A., Taualii, M., Arbour, L., Caron, N. R., & Rainie, S. C. (2019). Genomic research through an indigenous lens: understanding the expectations. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 20, 495-517. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genom-083118-015434.
Hudson, M., Garrison, N. A., Sterling, R., Caron, N. R., Fox, K., Yracheta, J., Anderson, J., Wilcox, P., Arbour, L., Brown, A., Taualii, M., Kukutai, T., Haring, R., Te Aika, B., Baynam, G. S., Dearden, P. K., Chagné, D., Malhi, R. S., Garba, I., … Carroll, S. R. (2020). Rights, interests and expectations: Indigenous perspectives on unrestricted access to genomic data. Nature Reviews Genetics, 21(6), 377-384. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-020-0228-x.
Hudson, M., Wilcox, P., Smith, B., Beaton, A., Milne, M., & Russell, K. (2018). (C)ELSI-us: Reducing Friction with Indigenous Communities in Genomic Research. American Anthropologist, 120(2), 330-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.13043.
Marden, E. (2018). International agreements may impact genomic technologies. Nature Plants, 4, 2-4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-017-0087-4.
Marden, E., Abbott, R. J., Austerlitz, F., Ortiz-Barrientos, D., Baucom, R. S., Bongaerts, P., Bonin, A., Bonneaud, C., Browne, L., Alex Buerkle, C., Caicedo, A. L., Coltman, D. W., Cruzan, M. B., Davison, A., DeWoody, J. A., Dumbrell, A. J., Emerson, B. C., Fountain-Jones, N. M., Gillespie, R., … Rieseberg, L. H. (2020). Sharing and reporting benefits from biodiversity research. Molecular Ecology, 30(5), 1103-1107. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15702.
Rieseberg, L., Warschefsky, E., O’Boyle, B., Taberlet, P., Ortiz-Barrientos, D., Kane, N. C., & Sibbett, B. (2021). Editorial 2021. Molecular Ecology, 30, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15759.
Riginos, C., Crandall, E. D., Liggins, L., Gaither, M. R., Ewing, R. B., Meyer, C., Andrews, K. R., Euclide, P. T., Titus, B. M., Therkildsen, N. O., Salces-Castellano, A., Stewart, L. C., Toonen, R. J., & Deck, J. (2020). Building a global genomics observatory: Using GEOME (the Genomic Observatories Metadatabase) to expedite and improve deposition and retrieval of genetic data and metadata for biodiversity research. Molecular Ecology Resources, 20(6), 1458-1469. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13269.
Ross, P. M., Knox, M. A., Smith, S., Smith, H., Williams, J., & Hogg, I. D. (2018). Historical translocations by Māori may explain the distribution and genetic structure of a threatened surf clam in Aotearoa (New Zealand). Scientific Reports, 8, 17241. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35564-4.
Smith, D. (2016). Governing data and data for governance: the everyday practice of Indigenous sovereignty. In T. Kukutai, & J. Taylor (Eds.), Indigenous Data Sovereignty: Toward an Agenda (pp. 117-135). Australian National University Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/CAEPR38.11.2016.07.
Smyth, S. J., Macall, D. M., Phillips, P. W., & de Beer, J. (2020). Implications of biological information digitization: Access and benefit sharing of plant genetic resources. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 23(3-4), 267-287. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12151.
United Nations (2011). Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Retrieved from https://www.cbd.int/abs/.