Multiple dimensions of social motivation in adult female degus.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 10 07 2020
accepted: 03 04 2021
entrez: 21 4 2021
pubmed: 22 4 2021
medline: 29 9 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Many animals become more motivated to interact after a period of isolation. This phenomenon may involve general drives, e.g. for social touch or companionship, as well as drives that are specific to particular peers, and which ultimately serve to reestablish relationships between the individuals. Female degus are known to be affiliative with multiple other individuals, including unrelated and unfamiliar conspecifics, offering an opportunity to study social motivation independent from exclusive pair-bonds or overt, same-sex competition. We attempted to disentangle factors driving peer interaction by examining reunion behavior across several social isolation and separation manipulations. High levels of interaction were observed between adult females who had been separated even without isolation, revealing a drive to re-establish relationships with specific peers. The content of separation-only reunions differed from isolation, with the latter involving more early-session interaction, higher levels of allogrooming before rear-sniffing, and a higher ratio of chitter vocalizations. To assess whether post-isolation behavior was related to stress, we examined reunions following a non-social (footshock) stressor. Like isolation, footshock increased early-session interactions, but did not increase allogrooming before rear-sniffing or chittering, as compared with controls. To test whether separation-only reunion behavior shared qualities with relationship formation, we also examined reunions of new (stranger) dyads. Strangers exhibited higher levels of interaction than cagemates, with particularly high levels of late-session rear-sniffing. Like separation-only reunions, strangers showed more non-chitter vocalizations and lower levels of allogrooming before rear-sniffing. Across experiments, an exploratory clustering method was used to identify vocalizations that differed between conditions. This yielded promising leads for future investigation, including a chaff-type syllable that may have been more common during relationship renewal. Overall, results are consistent with the hypothesis that female degu reunions are supported by both general and peer-stimulus specific drives, expressed through the structure of physical and vocal interactions over time.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33882104
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250219
pii: PONE-D-20-21367
pmc: PMC8059823
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0250219

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Physiol Behav. 1997 May;61(5):693-9
pubmed: 9145939
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1990 Winter;14(4):455-62
pubmed: 2287482
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2006 Jan;83(1):28-34
pubmed: 16458953
Physiol Behav. 2003 Aug;79(3):399-407
pubmed: 12954434
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 26;11(10):e0163978
pubmed: 27783705
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2012 Jun;37(6):762-72
pubmed: 21974975
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2007 Sep-Nov;32(8-10):966-80
pubmed: 17825994
Physiol Behav. 2011 May 3;103(2):125-33
pubmed: 21352836
Psychosom Med. 2006 Mar-Apr;68(2):238-45
pubmed: 16554389
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011 Aug;1231:17-22
pubmed: 21651565
Prog Brain Res. 2008;170:331-6
pubmed: 18655893
Physiol Behav. 1986;36(2):217-21
pubmed: 3960993
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1990 Jul;36(3):515-9
pubmed: 2377652
Horm Behav. 2003 Jan;43(1):108-14
pubmed: 12614640
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2010 Dec;20(6):784-94
pubmed: 20850965
Psychol Bull. 2014 Jan;140(1):256-82
pubmed: 23607429
Nat Neurosci. 2004 Oct;7(10):1048-54
pubmed: 15452576
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2009 Nov;34(10):1542-53
pubmed: 19553027
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 Mar;86:131-141
pubmed: 29223771
Cell. 2016 Feb 11;164(4):617-31
pubmed: 26871628
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 8;105(14):5567-72
pubmed: 18391192
Trends Neurosci. 2014 Nov;37(11):674-82
pubmed: 25160682
Anim Behav. 2000 Jun;59(6):1167-1176
pubmed: 10877896
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1980 Winter;4(4):473-87
pubmed: 6258111
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Oct;35(9):1854-63
pubmed: 21477615
Front Neuroendocrinol. 2009 Oct;30(4):470-482
pubmed: 19545584
Behav Processes. 2020 May;174:104102
pubmed: 32145271
Annu Rev Psychol. 2014;65:17-39
pubmed: 24050183
Science. 2016 Jan 22;351(6271):375-8
pubmed: 26798013
Neural Plast. 2016;2016:6212983
pubmed: 26881124
Curr Biol. 2018 Oct 8;28(19):3136-3142.e4
pubmed: 30245101
Physiol Behav. 2013 Jul 2;119:161-7
pubmed: 23769692
Anim Behav. 1973 Aug;21(3):557-63
pubmed: 4795935
Life Sci. 1984 Jul 30;35(5):487-91
pubmed: 6087065
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2007 Jan;292(1):R586-97
pubmed: 16917014
Nature. 2013 Sep 12;501(7466):179-84
pubmed: 24025838
Nat Neurosci. 2009 Feb;12(2):200-9
pubmed: 19151710
Anim Behav. 2000 Feb;59(2):423-432
pubmed: 10675265
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019 Apr;44(5):859-868
pubmed: 30610191
Physiol Behav. 2011 Oct 24;104(5):955-61
pubmed: 21712050
Front Behav Neurosci. 2019 Mar 19;13:52
pubmed: 30941022
Physiol Behav. 1982 Dec;29(6):1051-7
pubmed: 6298843
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2012 Feb;66(2):261-274
pubmed: 22344477
Am J Primatol. 1997;43(3):225-37
pubmed: 9359966
Science. 2008 Nov 7;322(5903):900-4
pubmed: 18988842
Horm Behav. 2012 Aug;62(3):314-23
pubmed: 22663934
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2016 Oct;40:8-13
pubmed: 27290660
Front Behav Neurosci. 2018 Mar 19;12:50
pubmed: 29615879
Biol Psychiatry. 1978 Oct;13(5):607-18
pubmed: 83167
Physiol Behav. 1982 Nov;29(5):819-25
pubmed: 7156221
Neuropsychobiology. 2012;66(2):112-9
pubmed: 22814229
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2015 Jul;57:93-101
pubmed: 25900596
Anim Behav. 1973 Aug;21(3):564-70
pubmed: 4795936
Biol Lett. 2007 Apr 22;3(2):147-9
pubmed: 17311775
Am J Primatol. 2008 Jul;70(7):621-8
pubmed: 18322923
Am J Primatol. 2020 Mar;82(3):e23105
pubmed: 32011759
Brain Res. 1998 Jan 19;781(1-2):57-61
pubmed: 9507065
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Feb 27;115(9):1974-1979
pubmed: 29432157
Biol Reprod. 2011 Apr;84(4):664-71
pubmed: 21084711
Behav Brain Res. 2017 Aug 14;332:362-371
pubmed: 28627387
Dev Psychobiol. 1987 Jul;20(4):465-76
pubmed: 3609493
ILAR J. 2004;45(1):14-24
pubmed: 14752204
Behav Processes. 2017 Nov;144:72-81
pubmed: 28941795
J Anim Ecol. 2016 Nov;85(6):1502-1515
pubmed: 27365190
Naturwissenschaften. 2004 Aug;91(8):391-5
pubmed: 15309311
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006 Dec 29;361(1476):2215-28
pubmed: 17118934

Auteurs

Navdeep K Lidhar (NK)

Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.

Ayushi Thakur (A)

Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Anna-Julia David (AJ)

Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Kaori Takehara-Nishiuchi (K)

Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Nathan Insel (N)

Department of Psychology, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, United States of America.

Articles similaires

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male
Humans Meals Time Factors Female Adult

Classifications MeSH