Is it a myth to perform blind apical wedge resection in primary spontaneous pneumothorax surgery to improve recurrence rates?

Apical wedge resection primary spontaneous pneumothorax recurrence rates

Journal

Journal of minimal access surgery
ISSN: 0972-9941
Titre abrégé: J Minim Access Surg
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101228183

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
pubmed: 23 4 2021
medline: 23 4 2021
entrez: 22 4 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Video-assisted thoracoscopy surgery (VATS) is the first method for the surgical treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP). Many surgeons traditionally performed bullectomy or wedge resection (WR) in addition to mechanical or chemical pleurodesis. Our study aimed to determine whether WR was necessary without seeing bleb or bullae during the surgery. Patients with no bleb or bullae detected during surgery were included in the study. Apical pleurectomy was performed in all cases. The patients were divided into two groups as WR and non-WR. The minimum follow-up period was 24 months. Medical records of patients were evaluated retrospectively. Patients who could not be followed up were excluded from the study. A total of 104 surgical treatments of PSP were performed, WR was not performed in 70 cases (67.3%). The surgical time was statistically significantly longer in the WR group than in the non-WR group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of drainage amount, drain removal time, length of hospital stay and bleeding requiring thoracotomy. Prolonged air leak was more common in the non-WR group than in the WR group (7.1% vs. 2.9%; P = 0.661). There was no difference in the rate of recurrence in either group. Recurrence was 2.9% (1/34) in the WR group and 2.9% (2/70) in the non-WR group. In VATS of PSP, blind apical WR without bleb or bullae reduced prolonged air leakage but did not contribute to lowering the rate of pneumothorax recurrence.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Video-assisted thoracoscopy surgery (VATS) is the first method for the surgical treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP). Many surgeons traditionally performed bullectomy or wedge resection (WR) in addition to mechanical or chemical pleurodesis. Our study aimed to determine whether WR was necessary without seeing bleb or bullae during the surgery.
METHODS METHODS
Patients with no bleb or bullae detected during surgery were included in the study. Apical pleurectomy was performed in all cases. The patients were divided into two groups as WR and non-WR. The minimum follow-up period was 24 months. Medical records of patients were evaluated retrospectively. Patients who could not be followed up were excluded from the study.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 104 surgical treatments of PSP were performed, WR was not performed in 70 cases (67.3%). The surgical time was statistically significantly longer in the WR group than in the non-WR group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of drainage amount, drain removal time, length of hospital stay and bleeding requiring thoracotomy. Prolonged air leak was more common in the non-WR group than in the WR group (7.1% vs. 2.9%; P = 0.661). There was no difference in the rate of recurrence in either group. Recurrence was 2.9% (1/34) in the WR group and 2.9% (2/70) in the non-WR group.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
In VATS of PSP, blind apical WR without bleb or bullae reduced prolonged air leakage but did not contribute to lowering the rate of pneumothorax recurrence.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33885029
pii: 313459
doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_269_20
pmc: PMC8973495
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

279-283

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

None

Références

Clin Respir J. 2019 Apr;13(4):195-201
pubmed: 30615303
World J Surg. 2019 Aug;43(8):2099-2105
pubmed: 30972431
Ann Thorac Surg. 2003 Nov;76(5):1661-3; discussion 1663-4
pubmed: 14602305
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Jul;40(1):120-3
pubmed: 21115258
Eur Respir Rev. 2010 Sep;19(117):217-9
pubmed: 20956196
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020 Jul 1;31(1):78-84
pubmed: 32353121
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 May;77(5):1802-5
pubmed: 15111189
Thorax. 2003 May;58 Suppl 2:ii39-52
pubmed: 12728149
J Surg Res. 2017 Apr;210:32-46
pubmed: 28457339
Ann Thorac Surg. 2000 Feb;69(2):357-61; discussion 361-2
pubmed: 10735663
Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Oct;45(5):316-9
pubmed: 23130305
Chest. 2017 Aug;152(2):417-423
pubmed: 28267436
Respir Med. 2018 Apr;137:152-166
pubmed: 29605200
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Feb;29(2):221-5
pubmed: 16376095
Eur Respir J. 2008 Apr;31(4):837-41
pubmed: 18057049
N Engl J Med. 2000 Mar 23;342(12):868-74
pubmed: 10727592
Am J Surg. 1991 Jul;162(1):39-42
pubmed: 2063968
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Feb;131(2):322-8
pubmed: 16434260
Eur J Respir Dis. 1987 Sep;71(3):181-6
pubmed: 3678419
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2019 Feb;29(1):58-63
pubmed: 30499890
Thorax. 2016 Sep;71(9):847-53
pubmed: 27422793

Auteurs

Mustafa Vayvada (M)

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Kartal Kosuyolu Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Yelda Tezel (Y)

Department of Chest Diseases, Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Çağatay Tezel (Ç)

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Classifications MeSH